Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Impact of Committee Composition and Agendas on Women's Participation: Evidence from a Legislature with Near Numerical Equality

  • Kendall D. Funk (a1), Laura Morales (a1) and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson (a1)
Abstract

Previous studies of women's participation in legislative debates could not disentangle the possible effect of institutionalized gender discrimination from the effect of gendered patterns because of women lacking seniority and leadership posts. Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly offers an opportunity to control for seniority and leadership. The prohibition on immediate reelection means that no legislators have seniority. The country's successful gender quota, presence of an equal number of men and women committee presidents, and election of the first woman president in 2010 all point to women having relatively equal access to formal positions of power. In this context, unequal debate participation between men and women legislators would indicate that it is very difficult to change the gendered nature of an institution. We use multilevel modeling to analyze repeated observations of individual-level participation in three of six standing committees during the 2010–14 term (Agriculture, Economics, and Social Issues) to explore differences in patterns of participation under various conditions (sex ratios, discussion topics, sex of committee leaders). Findings indicate that women are active participants in committees with both stereotypically feminine and masculine policy jurisdictions, but also that women are more active when the gender composition of the committee is less skewed.

Previous studies of women's participation in legislative debates could not disentangle the possible effect of institutionalized gender discrimination from the effect of gendered patterns because of women lacking seniority and leadership posts. Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly offers an opportunity to control for seniority and leadership. The prohibition on immediate reelection means that no legislators have seniority. The country's successful gender quota, presence of an equal number of men and women committee presidents, and election of the first woman president in 2010 all point to women having relatively equal access to formal positions of power. In this context, unequal debate participation between men and women legislators would indicate that it is very difficult to change the gendered nature of an institution. We use multilevel modeling to analyze repeated observations of individual-level participation in three of six standing committees during the 2010–14 term (Agriculture, Economics, and Social Issues) to explore differences in patterns of participation under various conditions (sex ratios, discussion topics, sex of committee leaders). Findings indicate that women are active participants in committees with both stereotypically feminine and masculine policy jurisdictions, but also that women are more active when the gender composition of the committee is less skewed.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Joan Acker . 1992. “From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21 (5): 565–69.

Martin Baekgaard , and Ulrik Kjaer . 2012. “The Gendered Division of Labor in Assignments to Political Committees: Discrimination or Self-Selection in Danish Local Politics?Politics & Gender 8 (4): 465–82.

Karen Beckwith . 2005. “A Common Language of Gender?Politics & Gender 1 (1): 128–37.

Karen Beckwith . 2007. “Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 40 (1): 2749.

Aude Bicquelet , Weale Albert , and Judith Bara . 2012. “In a Different Parliamentary Voice? Politics & Gender 8 (1): 83121.

Karen Bird . 2005. “Gendering Parliamentary Questions.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (3): 353–70.

Kathleen A. Bratton 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97125.

Sharon Broughton , and Sonia Palmieri . 1999. “Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 2945.

Anne Marie Cammisa , and Beth Reingold . 2004. “Women in State Legislatures and State Legislative Research: Beyond Sameness and Difference.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (2): 181210.

John M. Carey 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John M. Carey 1997. “Strong Candidates for a Limited Office: Presidentialism and Political Parties in Costa Rica.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, eds. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart . New York: Cambridge University Press, 199224.

Ana Catalano . 2009. “Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 7998.

Paul Chaney . 2006. “Critical Mass, Deliberation and the Substantive Representation of Women: Evidence from the UK's Devolution Programme.” Political Studies 54 (4): 691714.

Sarah Childs , and Julie Withey . 2004. “Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament.” Political Studies 52 (3): 552–64.

Carmen Diana Deere . 1978. “The Differentiation of the Peasantry and Family Structure: A Peruvian Case Study.” Journal of Family History 3 (4): 422–38.

Carmen Diana Deere . 1982. “The Division of Labor by Sex in Agriculture: A Peruvian Case Study.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 30 (4): 795811.

John F. Dovidio , Clifford E. Brown , Karen Heltman , Steve L. Ellyson , and Caroline F. Keating . 1988. “Power Displays between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (4): 580–87.

Meredyth Goldberg Edelson , Audrey Hokoda , and Luciana Ramos-Lira . 2007. “Differences in Effects of Domestic Violence between Latina and Non-Latina Women.” Journal of Family Violence 22 (1): 110.

Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon , and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson , eds. 2014. Representation: The Case of Women. New York: Oxford University Press.

Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon , Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer , and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson . 2014. “Representing Women: Empirical Insights from Legislatures and Cabinets in Latin America.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson . New York: Oxford University Press, 205–24.

Scott A. Frisch , and Sean Q. Kelly . 2003. “A Place at the Table: Women's Committee Requests and Women's Committee Assignments in the U.S. House.” Women & Politics 25 (3): 126.

Kendall D. Funk 2015. “Gendered Governing? Women's Leadership Styles and Participatory Institutions in Brazil.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (3): 564–78.

Geri-Ann Galanti . 2003. “The Hispanic Family and Male-Female Relationships: An Overview.” Journal of Transcultural Nursing 14 (3): 180–85.

Mary Hawkesworth . 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.

Roseanna Michelle Heath , Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer , and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson . 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women's Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 420–36.

Alisa Henderson . 2005. “Forging a New Political Culture: Plenary Behaviour in the Scottish Parliament.” Journal of Legislative Studies 11(2): 275301.

Anne Maria Holli . 2012. “Does Gender Have an Effect on the Selection of Experts by Parliamentary Standing Committees? A Critical Test of ‘Critical’ Concepts.” Politics & Gender 8 (3): 341–66.

Rosabeth Moss Kanter . 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–91.

Kristin Kanthak , and George A. Krause . 2010. “Valuing Diversity in Political Organizations: Gender and Token Minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 839–54.

Christopher F. Karpowitz , and Tali Mendelberg . 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lyn Kathlene . 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.

Sally J. Kenney 1996. “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (2): 445–66.

Yann P. Kerevel , and Lonna Rae Atkeson . 2013. “Explaining the Marginalization of Women in Legislative Institutions.” Journal of Politics 75 (4): 980–92.

Ioana M. Latu , Marianne Schmid Mast , Joris Lammers , and Dario Bombari . 2013. “Successful Female Leaders Empower Women's Behavior in Leadership Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (3): 444–48.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Richard L. Fox . 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fiona Mackey . 2011. “Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?” In Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, eds. Mona Lena Krook and Fiona Mackey . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 181–96.

Jane Mansbridge , and Shauna L. Shames . 2008. “Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power.” Politics & Gender 4 (4): 623–34.

Luis Felipe Miguel . 2012. “Policy Priorities and Women's Double Bind in Brazil.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, eds. Susan Franceschet , Mona Lena Krook , and Jennifer M. Piscopo . New York: Oxford University Press, 103–18.

Rainbow Murray . 2010a. “Linear Trajectories or Vicious Circles? The Causes and Consequences of Gendered Career Paths in the National Assembly.” Modern and Contemporary France 18 (4): 445–59.

Rainbow Murray . 2010b. “Second among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's ‘Quota Women’ Are Up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 93118.

Kathryn Pearson , and Logan Dancey . 2011. “Elevating Women's Voice in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–23.

Kathryn Pearson , and Logan Dancey . 2012. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 493519.

Victor B. Penchaszadeh 2001. “Genetic Counseling Issues in Latinos.” Genetic Testing 5 (3): 193200.

Jennifer M. Piscopo 2011. “Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates.” Parliamentary Affairs 64 (3): 338–72.

Beth Reingold . 2008. “Women as Officeholders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Christina Wolbrecht , Karen Beckwith , and Lisa Baldez . New York: Cambridge University Press, 128–47.

Cindy Simon Rosenthal . 1997. “A View of Their Own: Women's Committee Leadership Styles and State Legislatures.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 585600.

Fabio Sabogal , Gerardo Marín , Regina Otero-Sabogal , Barbara Vanoss Marín , and Eliseo J. Perez-Stable . 1987. “Hispanic Familism and Acculturation: What Changes and What Doesn't?Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 9 (4): 397412.

Michelle A. Saint-Germain , and Martha I. Morgan . 1991. “Equality: Costa Rican Women Demand ‘The Real Thing.’Women & Politics 11 (3): 2375.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer 2005. “The Incumbency Disadvantage and Women's Election to Legislative Office.” Electoral Studies 24 (2): 227–44.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer 2010. Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer , and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson . 2011. “The Meaning and Measurement of Women's Interests: Introduction.” Politics & Gender 7 (3): 417–46.

Marco R. Steenbergen , and Bradford S. Jones . 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–37.

Angel G. Lugo Steidel , and Josefina M. Contreras . 2003. “A New Familism Scale for Use with Latino Populations.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 25 (3): 312–30.

Michele L. Swers 2001. “Research on Women in Legislatures: What Have We Learned, Where Are We Going?Women & Politics 23 (1/2): 167–85.

Michele L. Swers 2014. “Unpacking Women's Issues: Gender and Policymaking on Health Care, Education, and Women's Health in the U.S. Senate.” In Representation: The Case of Women, eds. Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson . New York: Oxford University Press, 158–82.

Michelle M. Taylor 1992. “Formal versus Informal Incentive Structures and Legislator Behavior: Evidence from Costa Rica.” Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1053–71.

Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson , and Roseanna M. Heath . 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77101.

Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson , and Ashley Ross . 2011. “Can Formal Rules of Order Be Used as an Accurate Proxy for Behavior Internal to a Legislature? Evidence from Costa Rica.” Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (4): 479500.

Sue Thomas . 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ann Towns . 2003. “Understanding the Effects of Larger Ratios of Women in National Legislatures: Proportions and Gender Differentiation in Sweden and Norway.” Women & Politics 25 (1/2): 129.

Craig Volden , Alan Wiseman , and Dana Wittmer . 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 327–41.

Wendy Wood , and Stephen J. Karten . 1986. “Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 341–47.

Pär Zetterberg . 2008. “The Downside of Gender Quotas? Institutional Constraints on Women in Mexican State Legislatures.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 442–60.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 297 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.