Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ineffective and Counterproductive? The Impact of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Systems

  • Michael Jankowski (a1) and Kamil Marcinkiewicz (a2)
Abstract

Research on the impact of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation systems has described quotas as ineffective or even paradoxical. While some authors argue that gender quotas without a placement mandate will be essentially ineffective since most women will be nominated to unpromising positions, others suppose that women will be disadvantaged by gender quotas because the increase in the number of female candidates will decrease the average number of preferential votes cast for women. We reexamine the evidence for these claims by analyzing the case of Poland. We demonstrate that the gender quota introduced there in 2011 increased the number of women placed at promising ballot positions and had very little impact on the number of preferential votes cast for women. Additionally, using simulations, we show that the quota had a positive impact on the number of elected women.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allik Mirjam. 2015. “Who Stands in the Way of Women? Open vs. Closed Lists and Candidate Gender in Estonia.” East European Politics 31 (4): 429–51.
Baldez Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–58.
Besley Timothy, Folke Olle, Persson Torsten, and Rickne Johanna. 2017. “Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden.” American Economic Review 107 (8): 2204–42.
Blom-Hansen Jens, Elklit Jørgen, Serritzlew Søren, and Villadsen Lousie. 2016. “Ballot Position and Election Results: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Electoral Studies 44: 172–83.
Campbell Rosie, and Cowley Philip. 2014. “What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment.” Political Studies 62 (4): 745–65.
Carnes Nicholas, and Lupu Noam. 2016. “Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 832–44.
Dahlerup Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 7392.
Dubrow Johsua Kjerulf. 2011. “The Importance of Party Ideology: Explaining Parliamentarian Support for Political Party Gender Quotas in Eastern Europe.” Party Politics 17 (5): 561–79.
EAST PaC. 2015. “East European Parliamentarian and Candidate Data 1985–2014.” Funded by Poland's National Science Centre (decision number 2012/05/E/HS6/03556). https://electoralcontrol.org/east-pac-data/ (accessed November 8, 2017).
Erzeel Silvia, and Celis Karen. 2016. “Political Parties, Ideology and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Party Politics 22 (5): 576–86.
Faas Thorsten, and Schoen Harald. 2006. “The Importance of Being First: Effects of Candidates’ List Positions in the 2003 Bavarian State Election.” Electoral Studies 25 (1): 91102.
Folke Olle, and Rickne Johanna. 2016. “The Glass Ceiling in Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (5): 567–99.
Fortin-Rittberger Jessica, and Eder Christina. 2013. “Towards a Gender-Equal Bundestag? The Impact of Electoral Rules on Women's Representation.” West European Politics 36 (5): 969–85.
Fortin-Rittberger Jessica, and Rittberger Berthold. 2014. “Do Electoral Rules Matter? Explaining National Differences in Women's Representation in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 15 (4): 496520.
Fréchette Guillaume R., Maniquet Francois, and Morelli Massimo. 2008. “Incumbents’ Interests and Gender Quotas.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 891909.
Giger Nathalie, Holli Anne Maria, Lefkofridi Zoe, and Wass Hanna. 2014. “The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35: 303–14.
Golder Sona N., Stephenson Laura B., Van der Straeten Karine, Blais André, Bol Damien, Harfst Philipp, and Laslier Jean-François. 2017. “Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates.” Politics & Gender 13 (1): 107–31.
Górecki Maciej A., and Kukołowicz Paula. 2014. “Gender Quotas, Candidate Background and the Election of Women: A Paradox of Gender Quotas in Open-List Proportional Representation Systems.” Electoral Studies 36: 6580.
Gwiazda Anna. 2015. “Women's Representation and Gender Quotas: The Case of the Polish Parliament.” Democratization 22 (4): 679–97.
Gwiazda Anna. 2016. Democracy in Poland: Representation, Participation, Competition and Accountability since 1989. London: Routledge.
Holli Anne Maria, and Wass Hanna. 2010. “Gender-Based Voting in the Parliamentary Elections of 2007 in Finland.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 598630.
Jankowski Michael. 2016. “Voting for Locals: Voters’ Information Processing Strategies in Open-List PR Systems.” Electoral Studies 43 (3): 7284.
Jankowski Michael, and Marcinkiewicz Kamil. 2016. “Are Populist Parties Fostering Women's Political Representation in Poland? A Comment on Kostadinova and Mikulska.” Party Politics Published online June 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816650995.
Jones Mark P. 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Lessons from the Argentine Provinces.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (1): 321.
Jones Mark P. 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from the Latin American Vanguard.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (1): 5681.
Kelley Jonathan, and McAllister Ian. 1984. “Ballot Paper Cues and the Vote in Australia and Britain: Alphabetic Voting, Sex, and Title.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (2): 452–66.
Kostadinova Tatiana, and Mikulska Anna. 2015. “The Puzzling Success of Populist Parties in Promoting Women's Political Representation.” Party Politics 23 (4): 400412.
Krook Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krook Mona Lena, Lovenduski Joni, and Squires Judith. 2009. “Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 781803.
Krook Mona Lena, and Norris Pippa. 2014. “Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office.” Political Studies 62 (1): 220.
Kukołowicz Paula. 2013. “Do Voters Read Gender? Stereotypes as Voting Cues in Electoral Settings.” Polish Sociological Review 182 (2): 223–38.
Kunovich Sheri. 2003. “The Representation of Polish and Czech Women in National Politics: Predicting Electoral List Position.” Comparative Politics 35 (3): 273–91.
Kunovich Sheri. 2012. “Unexpected Winners: The Significance of an Open-List System on Women's Representation in Poland.” Politics & Gender 8 (2): 153–77.
Luhiste Maarja. 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 89116.
Marcinkiewicz Kamil. 2014. “Electoral Contexts That Assist Voter Coordination: Ballot Position Effects in Poland.” Electoral Studies 33: 322–34.
Marcinkiewicz Kamil, and Stegmaier Mary. 2015. “Ballot Position Effects under Compulsory and Optional Preferential-List PR Electoral Systems.” Political Behavior 37 (2): 465–86.
Marcinkiewicz Kamil, and Stegmaier Mary. 2016. “The Parliamentary Election in Poland, October 2015.” Electoral Studies 41: 221–24.
Marien Sofie, Schouteden Anke, and Wauters Bram. 2016. “Voting for Women in Belgium's Flexible List System.” Politics & Gender 13 (2): 305–35.
Matland Richard E. 1994. “Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 273–92.
Matland Richard E. 2004. “The Norwegian Experience of Gender Quotas.” Presented at the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)/CEE Network for Gender Issues Conference.
McElroy Gail, and Marsh Michael. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 822–33.
Millard Frances. 2014. “Not Much Happened: The Impact of Gender Quotas in Poland.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (1): 111.
Millard Frances, Popescu Marina, and Tóka Gabor. 2013. “The Impact of Preference Voting Systems on Women's Representation and the Legitimation of Quota-Based Nomination Results.” Presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research in Mainz, Germany, March 11–16.
Milyo Jeffrey, and Schosberg Samantha. 2000. “Gender Bias and Selection Bias in House Elections.” Public Choice 105 (1–2): 4159.
Put Gert-Jan, and Maddens Bart. 2013. “The Selection of Candidates for Eligible Positions on PR Lists: The Belgian/Flemish Federal Elections 1999–2010.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23 (1): 4965.
Quota Project. 2016. “Global Database of Quotas for Women.” http://www.quotaproject.org/.
Roberts Andrew, Seawright Jason, and Cyr Jennifer. 2013. “Do Electoral Laws Affect Women's Representation?Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1555–81.
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.
Schmidt Gregory D. 2009. “The Election of Women in List PR Systems: Testing the Conventional Wisdom.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 190203.
Schwindt-Bayer Leslie A., Malecki Michael, and Crisp Brian F.. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 693709.
Spierings Niels, and Jacobs Kristof. 2014. “Getting Personal? The Impact of Social Media on Preferential Voting.” Political Behavior 36 (1): 215–34.
Stegmaier Mary, Tosun Jale, and Vlachova Klara. 2014. “Women's Parliamentary Representation in the Czech Republic: Does Preference Voting Matter.” East European Politics and Societies 28 (1): 187204.
Thames Frank C., and Williams Margaret S.. 2010. “Incentives for Personal Votes and Women's Representation in Legislatures.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 15751600.
Thames Frank C., and Williams Margaret S.. 2013. Contagious Representation: Women's Political Representation in Democracies Around the World. New York: New York University Press.
Valdini Melody Ellis. 2012. “A Deterrent to Diversity: The Conditional Effect of Electoral Rules on the Nomination of Women Candidates.” Electoral Studies 31 (4): 740–49.
Van Erkel Patrick F. A., and Thijssen Peter. 2016. “The First One Wins: Distilling the Primacy Effect.” Electoral Studies 44: 245–54.
Vengroff Richard, Nyiria Zsolt, and Fugiero Melissa. 2003. “Electoral System and Gender Representation in Sub-National Legislatures: Is There a National-Sub-National Gender Gap?Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 163–73.
Verge Tània. 2015. “The Gender Regime of Political Parties: Feedback Effects between ‘Supply’ and ‘Demand.’” Politics & Gender 11 (4): 754–59.
Wauters Bram, Maddens Bart, and Put Gert-Jan. 2014. “It Takes Time: The Long-Term Effects of Gender Quota.” Representation 50 (2): 143–59.
Wauters Bram, Weekers Karolien, and Maddens Bart. 2010. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open-List PR System: An Investigation of the 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Acta Politica 45 (4): 468–90.
Wylie Kristin, and Santos Pedro dos. 2016. “A Law on Paper Only: Electoral Rules, Parties, and the Persistent Underrepresentation of Women in Brazilian Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 12 (3): 415–42.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Jankowski and Marcinkiewicz supplementary material 1
Appendix

 Word (65 KB)
65 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 176 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th December 2017 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.