Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen, eds. 1991. Gender and International Security. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peterson, V. Spike, ed. 1992. Gendered States: Feminist (Re)visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Reardon, Betty, 1985. Sexism and the War System. New York: Teachers' College Press.
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon.
Sharoni, Simona. 1997. “Commentary: In Search of Counterhegemonic Discourses of Peace.” Peace & Change: A Journal of Peace Research 22 (3): 281–92.
Shepherd, Laura. 2009. “Gender, Violence, and Global Politics: Contemporary Debates in Feminist Security Studies.” Political Studies Review 7 (2): 208–19.
Shepherd, Laura. 2010. “Feminist Security Studies.” In International Studies Encyclopedia, ed Denemark, Robert. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2009. “Introduction to Security Studies: Feminist Contributions.” Security Studies 18 (2): 183–213.
Sjoberg, Laura, ed. 2010. Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Smith, Steve. 1999. “The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years.” Contemporary Security Policy 20 (3): 72–101.
Squires, Judith, and Weldes, Jutta. 2007. “Beyond Being Marginal: Gender and International Relations in Britain.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9: 185–203.
Sylvester, Christine. 2005. “The Art of War/the War Question in (Feminist) IR.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 855–78.
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wibben, Annick. 2010. Feminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. London: Routledge.
Youngs, Gillian. 2004. “Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender are Essential to the World ‘We’ Live In.” International Affairs 80 (1): 75–87.
Zalewski, Marysia. 2007. “Do We Understand Each Other Yet? Troubling Feminist Encounters With(in) International Relations.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (3): 302–312.