Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?

  • Malliga Och

Abstract

The problem of manterrupting, i.e. men interrupting women to take control of a conversation, claiming superior knowledge, or discrediting women's arguments, has garnered major attention in social and traditional media. Yet scholarly accounts of gendered speech interruption patterns in parliamentary debates are less common. In this article, I argue that manterrupting can be considered a form of resistance against women in politics and, in its worst iteration, prevent female representatives from representing women's interests. This article will analyze the problem of ‘manterrupting’ regarding parliamentary debates in Germany by investigating the nature and extent of male interruptions during parliamentary debates in the 17th legislative period. Drawing on insights from social psychology and masculinity studies, this article finds that in the case of Germany, manterruptions are neither systemic and frequent enough to constitute a form of resistance against women in politics nor do they prevent female representatives from engaging in the substantive representation of women.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All

Previous versions of this article were presented at the Resisting Women’s Political Leadership: Theories, Data, Solutions Conference at Rutgers University (2017), the 24th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, and the Men and Masculinities and Politics workshop at the University of Bristol (2016). Many thanks to Sarah Childs, Mona Lena Krook, and Jennifer Piscopo for their insightful feedback.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bäck, H. & Debus, M., 2016. Political Parties, Parliaments and Legislative Speechmaking, Springer.
Bäck, H., Debus, M. & Müller, J., 2014. Who Takes the Pbardarliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-makingin the Swedish Riksdag. Political Research Quarterly, 67(3), pp. 504–5 1 8.
Bärs, Kathleen. 2010. Parlamentarische Zwischenrufe und ihre Funktion am Beispiel der Bundestagsdebatten zum Einsatz deutscher Soldaten in Mazedonien, Afghanistan und dem Irak. GRIN Verlag.
Bardall, Gabrielle. 2013. “Gender-Specific Election Violence: The Role of Information and Communication Technologies.” Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 2(3). http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/sta.cs/.
Baumann, Markus, Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2015. “Personal Characteristics of MPs and Legislative Behavior in Moral Policymaking: Legislative Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 179210.
Baxter, Judith. 2017. “Sociolinguistic Approaches to Gender and Leadership Theory.” In Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership, edited by Madsen, Susan R., 113–26. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bayley, P., 2004. Introduction: The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse. In Bayley, P., ed. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 144.
Bennett, Jessica. 2015. “Sheryl Sandberg, Talking While Female, and How to End ‘Manterrupting.’” TIMES Magazine.
Bjarnegard, Elin. 2013. Studying Men and Masculinities in Politics. Springer.
Bridges, Judith. 2017. “Gendering Metapragmatics in Online Discourse: ‘Mansplaining Man Gonna Mansplain….’” Discourse, Context & Media 20 (December): 94102.
Burgess, Diana, and Borgida, Eugene. 1999. “Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5(3): 665.
Burkhardt, Armin. 1992. “‘Das ist eine Frage des Intellekts, Frau Kollegin!‘ Zur Behandlung von Rednerinnen in deutschen Parlamenten.” In Die Geschlechter im Gespräch. Kommunikation in Institutionen, ed. by Günthner, Susanne, and Kotthoff, Helga, 287309. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Burkhardt, Armin. 2016. “German Parliamentary Discourse since 1848 from a Linguistic Point of View.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of a European Concept., edited by Pasi Ihalainen Cornelia Ilie, 176–91. New York: Berghahn Books.
Cameron, Deborah, and Shaw, Sylvia. 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech. Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carbó, Teresa. 1992. “Towards an Interpretation of Interruptions in Mexican Parliamentary Discourse (1920–60).” Discourse & Society 3(1): 2545.
Celis, Karen. 2009. “Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving It): What It Is and Should Be About?Comparative European Politics 7 (1): 95113.
Celis, K., Erzeel, S. & Mügge, L., 2015. Intersectional Puzzles: Understanding Inclusion and Equality in Political Recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11(4), pp. 765770.
Chaney, Paul. 2006. ‘Critical Mass, Deliberation and the Substantive Representation of Women: Evidence from the UK's Devolution Programme.’ Political Studies 54 (4). Wiley-Blackwell: 691–714.
Chaney, P. 2008. ‘Devolved Governance and the Substantive Representation of Women: The Second Term of the National Assembly for Wales, 2003–2007.’ Parliamentary Affairs 61 (2). Oxford University Press (OUP): 272–90.
Chappell, Bill. “Republicans Vote To Silence Sen. Elizabeth Warren In Confirmation Debate.” NPR.org. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/08/514051080/republicans-vote-to-silence-sen-elizabeth-warren-in-confirmation-debate (Accessed August 9, 2017).
Cheng, Cliff. 2007. “Marginalized Masculinities and Hegemonic Masculinity: An Introduction.” The Journal of men's studies 7(3): 295315.
Clayton, A., Josefsson, C. & Wang, V., 2017. Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Evidence from a Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates. Politics & Gender, 13(2), pp. 276304.
Coates, Jennifer. 2016. Women, Men and Language. 3rd ed. New-York, NY: Routledge.
Collier, Cheryl N., and Raney, Tracey. 2018. “Understanding Sexism and Sexual Harassment in Politics: A Comparison of Westminster Parliaments in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada.” Social Politics 25 (3): 432–55.
Dahl, Julia, Vescio, Theresa, and Weaver, Kevin. 2015. “How Threats to Masculinity Sequentially Cause Public Discomfort, Anger, and Ideological Dominance Over Women.” Social Psychology 46(4): 242254.
“Dresses unwelcome: French MPs catcall female colleague—RT News.” RT International. https://www.rt.com/news/france-parliament-dress-duflot-599/ (Accessed August 9, 2017).
Eagly, Alice, and Karau, Steven. 2002. “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.” Psychological review 109(3): 573.
Edelsky, C. & Adams, K., 1990. Creating Inequality: Breaking the Rules in Debates. Journal of language and social psychology, 9(3), pp.171190.
Eecke, Paul Van, and Fernández, Raquel. 2016. “On the Influence of Gender on Interruptions in Multiparty Dialogue.” In Interspeech 2016, 2016:2070–74. Interspeech. ISCA.
Erikson, Josefina, and Josefsson, Cecilia. 2018. “The Legislature as a Gendered Workplace: Exploring Members of Parliament's Experiences of Working in the Swedish Parliament.” International Political Science Review, January.
Fraune, C., 2016. The politics of speeches, votes, and deliberations: Gendered legislating and energy policy-making in Germany and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 19, pp.134141.
Funk, K. & Taylor-Robinson, M., 2014. Gender Imbalances in Committees and how it impacts participation. Revista Uruguay de Ciencia Politica, 23(2).
Georgalidou, Marianthi. 2017. “Addressing Women in the Greek Parliament.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5 (1): 3056.
Grebelsky-Lichtman, Tsfira. 2017. “Female Politicians: A Mixed Political Communication Model.” The Journal of International Communication 23 (2): 272–97.
Grey, S., 2006. Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research. Politics & Gender, 2(4), pp.492502.
Houvouras, S. & Scott Carter, J., 2008. The F Word: College Students’ Definitions of a Feminist. Sociological Forum, 23(2), pp. 234256.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2013. “Gendering Confrontational Rhetoric: Discursive Disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.” Democratization 20 (3): 501–21.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2015. “Parliamentary Discourse.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Tracy, Karen and Sandel, Todd, 10:115. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jacobi, Tonja, and Schweers, Dylan. 2017. “Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments.” Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper 17-03, March.
Jones, Jennifer J. 2016. “Talk ‘Like a Man’: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 625–42.
Kathlene, L., 1994. Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: the interaction of genderand position in committee hearing debates. The American political science review, 88(3), pp.560576.
Kimmel, M. S. 1993. “Invisible masculinity.” Society 30(6): 2835.
Kittilson, M.C., 2008. Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective. The journal of politics, 70(2), pp.323334.
Kollock, Peter, Blumstein, Philip, and Schwartz, Pepper. 1985. “Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties.” American sociological review 50(1): 3446.
Krook, Mona Lena, and Sanín, Juliana Restrepo. 2016. “A Defense of the Concept.” Política y gobierno XXIII(2): 459490.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2017. “Violence Against Women in Politics.” Journal of Democracy 28(1): 7488.
Lawson, Robert, Lutzky, Ursula. 2016. “Not Getting in a Word in Edgeways? Language, Gender, Identity in a British Comedy Panel Show.” Discourse, Context, Media 13: 143–53.
Maloney, Ryan. 2014. “Chrystia Freeland Heckled In House, Commentator Tells Her To Use ‘Big Girl Voice’ (VIDEO).” HuffPost Canada. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/02/04/chrystia-freeland-question-period-video_n_4726222.html (Accessed August 9, 2017).
Mansbridge, Jane, and Shames, Shauna. 2008. “Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power.” Polit Gender 4(4): 623634.
Mullany, Louise, Young, Melissa. 2018. “Gender and the Workplace.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, edited by Vine, Bernadette, 311–22. New-York, NY: Routledge.
Murray, R., 2010. Second Among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's “Quota Women” are Up to the Job. Politics & Gender, 6(1), pp.93118.
Murray, Rainbow. 2014. “Quotas for men: Reframing gender quotas as a means for improving representation for all.” 108(3): 520–532.
Netchaeva, Ekaterina, Kouchaki, Maryam, and Sheppard, Leah D.. 2015. “A Man's (Precarious) Place.” 41(9): 1247–1259.
Norris, P. & Inglehart, R., 2001. Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), pp.126140.
O'Connor, Emma, Ford, Thomas, and Banos, Noely. 2017. “Restoring Threatened Masculinity: The Appeal of Sexist and Anti-Gay Humor.” Sex Roles: 1–14.
Palonen, Kari. 2019. Parliamentary Thinking. Procedure, Rhetoric and Time. Rhetoric, Politics, and Society. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dana Patton, Joseph L. Smith. 2017. “Lawyer, Interrupted. Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts, 337–61.
Paxton, P. & Kunovich, S., 2003. Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology. Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation, 82(1), pp.87113.
Pearson, K. & Dancey, L., 2011. Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era. Politics & Gender, 7(4), pp.493519.
Piscopo, J. M. 2011. ‘Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates.’ Parliamentary Affairs 64 (3). Oxford University Press (OUP): 448–72.
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2016. “State Capacity, Criminal Justice, and Political Rights: Rethinking Violence against Women in Politics.” Política y Gobierno 23(2): 437–458.
Rogers, Katie. 2017. “Kamala Harris Is (Again) Interrupted While Pressing a Senate Witness.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/us/politics/kamala-harris-interrupted-jeff-sessions.html (Accessed August 9, 2017).
Reingold, Beth. 2008. ‘Women as Officeholders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.’ Edited by Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge University Press (CUP), 128–47.
Rudman, Laurie et al. 2012. “Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(1): 165179.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2008. “Gender Backlash in American Politics?Polit Gender 4(4): 634642.
Sanghani, Radhika. 2014. “Sexist Bullying in Politics: ‘Why Don't You Get Married?’” The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10914073/Sexist-bullying-in-politics-why-dont-you-get-married.html (accessed May 8, 2015).
Shaw, S. 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse & Society 11 (3): 401–18.
Shaw, S., 2006. Governed by the Rules? The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates. In Baxter, J., ed. Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Context. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 81102.
Shaw, Sylvia. 2013. “‘I Am Not an Honourable Lady’: Gender and Language in the National Assembly for Wales.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 8 (3): 275.
Shenhav, Shaul R. 2008. “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin's Speeches in the Israeli Parliament.” Discourse & Society 19 (2): 223–55.
Steiner, Jürg, Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus, and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Stopfner, Maria. 2018. “Put Your ‘big Girl’ Voice on.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (5): 617–35.
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Heath, Roseanna Michelle. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77101.
Thomas, Sue. 1991. ‘The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.’ The Journal of Politics 53 (04). University of Chicago Press: 958
van Dijk, Teun a. 1997. “What Is Political Discourse Analysis?Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11 (1): 1152.
Wang, V., 2014. Tracing Gender Differences in Parliamentary Debates: A Growth Curve Analysis Of Ugandan MPs’ Activity Levels In Plenary Sessions, 1998–2008. Representations, 50(3), pp.365377.
Wängerud, Lena. 2015. The Principles of Gender Sensitive Parliaments. New York: Routledge

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed