No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What Difference Does It Make? Gendered Campaigning in the 2016 Irish General Election
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2019
Abstract
Possible gender differences in the self-presentation of political candidates have been a recurring research topic for many years. Yet studies that compare large numbers of candidates have mainly used data from the United States. This article uses a unique data set from the run-up to the 2016 general election in Ireland to compare the self-presentation of male and female candidates. The data are based on video statements of almost 90% of the candidates who ran in the election. With its lack of party polarization and recent introduction of a gender quota, Ireland is a particularly interesting case for analyzing possible gender differences in political campaigning. Findings confirm previous research that has found few gender differences in issue priorities but contradict it in other respects, especially regarding differences in stressing political experience and personal background. The results suggest that female candidates saw electoral benefits from conforming to expectations about women as caregivers, but they wished to avoid a stereotype limiting them to this role by also emphasizing their occupational background. Their strong personalization may also indicate an attempt to stress individuality in a context in which the gender quota drew special attention to women as a category.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019
References
REFERENCES
Andris, Clio, Lee, David, Hamilton, Marcus J., Martino, Mauro, Gunning, Christian E., and Selden, John Armistead. 2015. “The Rise of Partisanship and Super-Cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives.” PLOS ONE 10 (4): e0123507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banwart, Mary Christine, and Winfrey, Kelly L.. 2013. “Running on the Web: Online Self-Presentation Strategies in Mixed-Gender Races.” Social Science Computer Review 31 (5): 614–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Sean, and Farrell, David M.. 2017. “The Lack of Party System Change in Ireland in 2011.” In A Conservative Revolution? Electoral Change in Twenty-First Century Ireland, eds. Marsh, Michael, Farrell, David M., and McElroy, Gail. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, Nils. 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buckley, Fiona. 2013. “Women and Politics in Ireland: The Road to Sex Quotas.” Irish Political Studies 28 (3): 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Fiona, Galligan, Yvonne, and McGing, Claire. 2016. “Women and the Election: Assessing the Impact of Gender Quotas.” In How Ireland Voted 2016: The Election That Nobody Won, eds. Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Fiona, Mariani, Mack, McGing, Claire, and White, Timothy. 2015. “Is Local Office a Springboard for Women to Dáil Éireann?” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 36 (3): 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Fiona, Mariani, Mack, and White, Timothy J.. 2014. “Will Legislative Gender Quotas Increase Female Representation in Ireland? A Feminist Institutionalism Analysis.” Representation 50 (4): 471–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne. 2018. “Gender and Communication on the Campaign Trail. Media Coverage, Advertising, and Online Outreach.” In Gender and Elections. Shaping the Future of American Politics, eds. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 250–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne G., Robertson, Terry, Banwart, Mary Christine, and Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2004. Gender and Candidate Communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, NewStyle. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carty, R. K. 1981. “Brokerage and Partisanship. Politicians, Parties and Elections in Ireland.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 14 (1): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for American Women and Politics. 2019. “History of Women in the U.S. Congress.” http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/history-women-us-congress (accessed November 6, 2019).Google Scholar
Collins, Stephen. 2011. “Household Tax Fallout Shows Sad Lack of Understanding.” Irish Times, July 30.Google Scholar
Costello, Rory, O'Neill, Paul, and Thomson, Robert. 2016. “The Fulfilment of Election Pledges by the Outgoing Government.” In How Ireland Voted 2016: The Election That Nobody Won, eds. Gallagher, Michael and Marsh, Michael. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darker, Catherine D., Donnelly-Swift, Erica, and Whiston, Lucy. 2018. “Demographic Factors and Attitudes That Influence the Support of the General Public for the Introduction of Universal Healthcare in Ireland: A National Survey.” Health Policy 122 (2): 147–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devitt, Camilla. 2016. “Mothers or Migrants? Labor Supply Policies in Ireland 1997–2007.” Social Politics 23 (2): 214–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Steffen, Valerie J.. 1984. “Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (4): 735–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi. 2018. “Gender Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Psychology 69: 275–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, David M., Suiter, Jane, and Harris, Clodagh. 2017. “The Challenge of Reforming a ‘Voter-Friendly’ Electoral System: The Debates over Ireland's Single Transferable Vote.” Irish Political Studies 32 (2): 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2014. The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of U.S. Senators and Constituent Communications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Komito, Lee. 2010. “The Constituency Role of Dáil Deputies.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 5th ed., eds. Coakley, John and Gallagher, Michael. London: Routledge, 230–62.Google Scholar
Gupta, Vishal K., Turban, Daniel B., Arzu Wasti, S., and Sikdar, Arijit. 2017. “The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Perceptions of Entrepreneurs and Intentions to Become an Entrepreneur.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33 (2): 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and Lawless, Jennifer. 2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1993. “Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 481–502.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Sarah. 2014. “A Pragmatic Partnership: Politicians and Local Media.” In Political Communication in the Republic of Ireland, eds. O'Brien, Mark and Beacháin, Donnacha Ó. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 45–61.Google Scholar
Keenan, Lisa, and McElroy, Gail. 2017. “Who Supports Gender Quotas in Ireland?” Irish Political Studies 32 (3): 382–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Kathleen, Baker, John, and Lyons, Maureen, eds. 2009. Affective Inequality: Love, Care and Injustice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America : the dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGraw, Sean. 2016. “Ideological Flexibility and Electoral Success: An Analysis of Irish Party Competition.” Irish Political Studies 31 (4): 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Shannon C., Lawrence, Regina G., and Cardona, Arielle. 2017. “Personalization, Gender, and Social Media: Gubernatorial Candidates’ Social Media Strategies.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (2): 264–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeks, Lindsey. 2017. “Getting Personal: Effects of Twitter Personalization on Candidate Evaluations.” Politics & Gender 13 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molony, Martin. 2014. “Social Media and Political Communication.” In Political Communication in the Republic of Ireland, eds. O'Brien, Mark and Beacháin, Donnacha Ó. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 201–15.Google Scholar
Murphy-Lawless, Jo. 2000. “Changing Women's Lives: Child Care Policy in Ireland.” Feminist Economics 6 (1): 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Ferrall, Fergus. 2009. “The Erosion of Citizenship in the Irish Republic: The Case of Healthcare Reform.” Irish Review, no. 40–41: 155–70.Google Scholar
O'Leary, Eimear. 2011. “The Constituency Orientation of Modern TDs.” Irish Political Studies 26 (3): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). n.d. “Social Protection and Well-Being Database.” https://stats.oecd.org.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, Sara. 2012a. “‘All Changed, Changed Utterly’? Gender Role Attitudes and the Feminisation of the Irish Labour Force.” Women's Studies International Forum 35 (4): 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, Sara. 2012b. “Onwards and Upwards? Gender and Work in Ireland.” Sociology Compass 6 (5): 376–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, Fintan. 2011. “Clientelism Exposes Hypocrisy of Politics.” Irish Times, August 9.Google Scholar
Prentice, Deborah A., and Carranza, Erica. 2002. “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't Be, Are Allowed to Be, and Don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 (4): 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 2006. “Gender and Interaction.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, eds. Chafetz, Janet Saltzman and Kaplan, Howard B.. Boston: Springer, 247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia, Walsh, Katherine Cramer, Strach, Patricia, and Hennings, Valerie. 2011. “Gender, Context and Television Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis of 2000 and 2002 House Races.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 107–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C. 2014. “Gender-Based Strategies on Candidate Websites.” Journal of Political Marketing 13 (4): 264–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1972. The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Sinnott, Richard. 2010. “The Electoral System.” In Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 5th ed., eds. Coakley, John and Gallagher, Michael. London: Routledge, 111–36.Google Scholar
Stalsburg, Brittany L. 2010. “Voting for Mom: The Political Consequences of Being a Parent for Male and Female Candidates.” Politics & Gender 6 (3): 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalsburg, Brittany L., and Kleinberg, Mona S.. 2015. “‘A Mom First and a Candidate Second’: Gender Differences in Candidates’ Self-Presentation of Family.” Journal of Political Marketing 15 (4): 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windett, Jason Harold. 2014. “Gendered Campaign Strategies in U.S. Elections.” American Politics Research 42 (4): 628–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berghe, Pierre L. 1997. “Rehabilitating Stereotypes.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 20 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar