Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

What Makes a Good Politician? Reassessing the Criteria Used for Political Recruitment

  • Rainbow Murray (a1)

Certain societal groups are significantly overrepresented within politics, including men, ethnic majority groups, and socioeconomic elites. This has fueled debates regarding meritocracy within political recruitment. While meritocracy is desirable, its definition and measurement are contested. The criteria used in theoretical and empirical academic studies differ from those of political parties and voters, as discussed below. Furthermore, there is bias in favor of the male status quo, with all groups preferring the qualities of existing elites. The definition of a “good” politician is therefore highly subjective. Nonetheless, political traditionalists claim that the “best” candidate should be selected even if this leads to significant gender imbalance in parliaments. Yet, if political recruitment is biased in favor of social elites, the overrecruitment of men may not derive solely from merit (Murray 2014). Without definitive criteria for evaluating prospective candidates and judging those already elected, we cannot determine whether political recruitment is meritocratic.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Deborah Alexander , and Kristi Andersen . 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.

Audinga Baltrunaite , Piera Bello , Alessandra Casarico , and Paola Profeta . 2014. “Gender Quotas and the Quality of Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 118: 6274.

Elin Bjarnegård . 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

David E. Brookman 2013. “Black Politicians are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–36.

Rosie Campbell , and Philip Cowley . 2014a. “What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment.” Political Studies 62 (4): 745–65.

Rosie Campbell , and Philip Cowley . 2014b. “Rich Man, Poor Man, Politician Man: Wealth Effects in a Candidate Biography Survey Experiment.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16 (1): 5674.

Philip Cowley . 2013. “Why Not Ask the Audience? Understanding the Public's Representational Priorities.” British Politics 8 (2): 138–63.

Suzanne Dovi . 2007. The Good Representative. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Susan Franceschet , Mona Lena Krook , and Jennifer M. Piscopo , eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.

Maciej A. Górecki , and Michael Marsh . 2012. “Not Just ‘Friends and Neighbours’: Canvassing, Geographic Proximity and Voter Choice.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (5): 563–82.

Reuven Y. Hazan , and Gideon Rahat . 2010. Democracy within Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkildsen . 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.

Jennifer Lawless , and Richard L. Fox . 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jane Mansbridge . 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.

Rainbow Murray . 2010b. Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Pippa Norris , and Joni Lovenduski . 1995. Political Recruitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Diana Z. O'Brien 2012. “Quotas and Qualifications in Uganda.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Susan Franceschet , Mona Lena Krook , and Jennifer M. Piscopo . New York: Oxford University Press, 5771.

Beth Reingold . 2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, ed. Christina Wolbrecht , Karen Beckwith , and Lisa Baldez . New York: Cambridge University Press, 128–47.

Michele L. Swers 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Co-Sponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 407–33.

Nick Vivyan , and Markus Wagner . 2015. “What do Voters Want from their Local MP?Political Quarterly, Early View. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12128.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 58 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 192 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.