Skip to main content

Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition

  • Scott Pruysers (a1) and Julie Blais (a2)

Among the most well-documented and long-standing gender gaps in political behavior are those relating to political ambition, as men have consistently been shown to express a significantly higher level of political ambition than women. Although this gap is well established, the reasons for the differences between men and women remain largely unknown. One possible explanation is that negative stereotypes about women's political ability are responsible. Stereotype threat, as it is referred to in the psychology literature, is a phenomenon where individuals of a social group suffer cognitive burdens and anxiety after being exposed to negative stereotypes that relate to their identity. These disruptions have been shown to alter attitudes and behavior. In order to test this possibility, we employed an experimental design whereby we randomly assigned 501 undergraduate students into threat and nonthreat conditions. While men exhibited higher levels of political ambition in both conditions, women in the nonthreat condition expressed significantly higher levels of political ambition than those women who were exposed to negative stereotypes. The results of this study therefore suggest that the gender gap in political ambition may be partly explained by negative stereotypes about women in politics.

Hide All
Aalberg Toril, and Jenssen Anders Todal. 2007. “Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates: An Experimental Study of Political Communication.” Nordicom Review 28 (1): 1732.
Anderson Karrin Vasby. 2011. “‘Rhymes with Blunt’: Pornification and U.S. Political Culture.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 14 (2): 327–68.
Anzia Sarah F., and Berry Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.
Bashevkin Sylvia. 2009. Women, Power, Politics: The Hidden Story of Canada's Unfinished Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Black Jerome, and Erickson Lynda. 2003. “Women Candidates and Voter Bias: Do Women Politicians Need to be Better?Electoral Studies 22 (1): 81100.
Bledsoe Timothy, and Herring Mary. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.
Brooks Deborah Jordon. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597615.
Brooks Deborah Jordon. 2013 He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes do not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carroll Susan J. 1985. “Political Elites and Sex Differences in Political Ambition: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Politics 47 (4): 1231–43.
Caul Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-national Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.
Caul Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7988.
Clark Janet. 1994. “Getting There: Women in Political Office.” In Different Roles, Different Voices, ed. Githens Marianne, Norris Pippa, and Lovenduski Joni. New York: Harper-Collins.
Constantini Edmond. 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–70.
Croizet Jean-Claude, and Claire Theresa. 1998. “Extending the Concept of Stereotype and Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (6): 588–94.
Daugherty Amber. 2013. “Women Know Less about Politics than Men.” The Globe and Mail, July 3. (accessed September 22, 2016).
Davidson-Schmich Louise K. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder 1990–2000.” Party Politics 12 (2): 211–32.
Dolan Kathleen A. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder: Westview Press.
Elder Laurel. 2004. “Why Women Don't Run: Explaining Women's Underrepresentation in America's Political Institutions.” Women and Politics 26 (2): 2756.
Equal Voice. 2015. Fundamental Facts. (accessed September 22, 2016.
Fox Richard L., and Lawless Jennifer L.. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.
Fox Richard L., and Lawless Jennifer L.. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.
Fox Richard L., and Lawless Jennifer L.. 2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 5973.
Fox Richard L., Lawless Jennifer L., and Feeley Courtney. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–35.
Fulton Sarah. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–14.
Fulton Sarah. 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Mirco-mechanisms.” Political Behaviour 36 (3): 605630.
Gidengil Elizabeth, Giles Janine, and Thomas Melanee. 2008. “The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States. Gender & Politics 4 (4): 535–61.
Hartman Rachael Rose. 2012. “78 Percent of Americans Frustrated by Negative Campaigns, Poll Finds.” Yahoo! News. July 14. (accessed September 22, 2016).
Hayes Danny, and Lawless Jennifer L.. 2015. “A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 95118.
Huddy Leonie, and Terkildsen Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2014. “Women in National Parliaments.” (accessed September 22, 2016).
Krook Mona Lena. 2010. “Why are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.
Krook Mona Lena, and O'Brien Diana Z.. 2012. “All the President's Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 840–55.
Lawless Jennifer L. 2009. “Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 7080.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Fox Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Fox Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Fox Richard L.. 2013. Girls Just Wanna Not Run: The Gender Gap in Young Americans' Political Ambition. Washington, D.C.: Women and Politics Institute.
Lawless Jennifer L., and Pearson Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Under-Representation: Re–Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.
Levy Becca. 1996. “Improving Memory in Old Age through Implicit Self- Stereotyping.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (6): 10921107.
Mayer Jeremy D., and Schmidt Heather M.. 2004. “Gendered Political Socialization in Four Contexts: Political Interest and Values among Junior High School Students in China, Japan, Mexico, and the United States.” The Social Science Journal 41 (3): 393407.
McGlone Matthew S., Aronson Joshua, and Kobrynowicz Diane. 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (4): 392–98.
Norris Pippa, and Lovenduski Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer Barbara, and Simon Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Pearson Kathryn, and McGhee Eric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics and Gender 9 (4): 439–62.
Pew Research Center. 2008. “More Americans View Campaign as Too Negative.” (accessed September 22, 2016).
Pruysers Scott, and Blais Julie. 2014. “Anything Women Can Do Men Can Do Better: An Experiment Examining the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Political Knowledge and Efficacy.” The Social Science Journal 51 (3): 341–49.
Rinehart Sue. 1991. “Do Women Leaders Make a Difference? Substance, Style, and Perceptions.” In Gender and Policymaking: Studies of Women in Office, ed. Dodson Debra. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Samara. 2012. “Who's the Boss? Canadians’ Views on Their Democracy.” Samara Democracy Report #4. (accessed September 22, 2016).
Sanbonmatsu Kira. 2006. “Do Parties Know that ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 431–50.
Sanbonmatsu Kira, and Dolan Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–94.
Seltzer Richard, Newman Jody, and Leighton Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Sigel Roberta. 1990. “The Case for Educating Gender Equality.” In Political Socialization, Citizenship Evaluation, and Democracy, ed. Ichilov Orit. New York: Teachers College Press.
Smith Eric R. A. N., and Fox Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.
Spencer Steven J., Steele Claude M., and Quinn Diane M.. 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 428.
Steele Claude and Aronson Joshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5): 797811.
Streb Matthew J., Burrell Barbara, Frederick Brian, and Genovese Michael A.. 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 7689.
Thomas Melanee. 2012. “The Complexity Conundrum: Why Hasn't the Gender Gap in Subjective Political Competence Closed?Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 337–58.
Thomma Stephen. 2000. “Men Outpace Women in Quiz about Candidates and the Issues. (accessed September 22, 2016).
Tremblay Manon. 1998. “Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada's 35th Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 435–65.
Tremblay Manon. 2007. “Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis.” Democratization 14 (4): 533–53.
Trimble Linda. 2007. “Gender, Political Leadership and Media Visibility: Globe and Mail Coverage of Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Contests.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 969–93.
Vickers Jill. 1997. Reinventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach. Halifax: Fernwood.
Volden Craig, Wiseman Alan E., and Wittmer Dana E.. 2013. “When are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–41.
Wauters Bram, and Pilet Jean-Benoit. 2016. “Electing Women as Party Leaders: Does the Selectorate Matter?” In The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-national Perspective, ed. Cross William and Pilet Jean Benoit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wigfield Allan, Eccles Jacquelynne S., and Pintrich Paul R.. 1996. “Development between the Ages of 11 and 25.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, ed. Berliner David C. and Calfee Robert C.. New York: Macmillan.
World Values Survey Wave 6 2010–2014 Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association ( Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid, Spain.
Young Lisa. 2009. “Women (Not) in Politics: Women's Electoral Participation.” In Canadian Politics, ed. Bickerton James and Gagnon Alain. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Pruysers and Blais supplementary material
Pruysers and Blais supplementary material

 Word (75 KB)
75 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 41
Total number of PDF views: 263 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 841 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th October 2016 - 25th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.