Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition

  • Scott Pruysers (a1) and Julie Blais (a2)
Abstract

Among the most well-documented and long-standing gender gaps in political behavior are those relating to political ambition, as men have consistently been shown to express a significantly higher level of political ambition than women. Although this gap is well established, the reasons for the differences between men and women remain largely unknown. One possible explanation is that negative stereotypes about women's political ability are responsible. Stereotype threat, as it is referred to in the psychology literature, is a phenomenon where individuals of a social group suffer cognitive burdens and anxiety after being exposed to negative stereotypes that relate to their identity. These disruptions have been shown to alter attitudes and behavior. In order to test this possibility, we employed an experimental design whereby we randomly assigned 501 undergraduate students into threat and nonthreat conditions. While men exhibited higher levels of political ambition in both conditions, women in the nonthreat condition expressed significantly higher levels of political ambition than those women who were exposed to negative stereotypes. The results of this study therefore suggest that the gender gap in political ambition may be partly explained by negative stereotypes about women in politics.

Among the most well-documented and long-standing gender gaps in political behavior are those relating to political ambition, as men have consistently been shown to express a significantly higher level of political ambition than women. Although this gap is well established, the reasons for the differences between men and women remain largely unknown. One possible explanation is that negative stereotypes about women's political ability are responsible. Stereotype threat, as it is referred to in the psychology literature, is a phenomenon where individuals of a social group suffer cognitive burdens and anxiety after being exposed to negative stereotypes that relate to their identity. These disruptions have been shown to alter attitudes and behavior. In order to test this possibility, we employed an experimental design whereby we randomly assigned 501 undergraduate students into threat and nonthreat conditions. While men exhibited higher levels of political ambition in both conditions, women in the nonthreat condition expressed significantly higher levels of political ambition than those women who were exposed to negative stereotypes. The results of this study therefore suggest that the gender gap in political ambition may be partly explained by negative stereotypes about women in politics.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Toril Aalberg , and Anders Todal Jenssen . 2007. “Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates: An Experimental Study of Political Communication.” Nordicom Review 28 (1): 1732.

Karrin Vasby Anderson . 2011. “‘Rhymes with Blunt’: Pornification and U.S. Political Culture.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 14 (2): 327–68.

Sarah F. Anzia , and Christopher R. Berry . 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.

Jerome Black , and Lynda Erickson . 2003. “Women Candidates and Voter Bias: Do Women Politicians Need to be Better?Electoral Studies 22 (1): 81100.

Timothy Bledsoe , and Mary Herring . 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.

Deborah Jordon Brooks . 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597615.

Susan J. Carroll 1985. “Political Elites and Sex Differences in Political Ambition: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Politics 47 (4): 1231–43.

Miki Caul . 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-national Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.

Miki Caul . 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7988.

Edmond Constantini . 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–70.

Jean-Claude Croizet , and Theresa Claire . 1998. “Extending the Concept of Stereotype and Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (6): 588–94.

Louise K. Davidson-Schmich 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder 1990–2000.” Party Politics 12 (2): 211–32.

Laurel Elder . 2004. “Why Women Don't Run: Explaining Women's Underrepresentation in America's Political Institutions.” Women and Politics 26 (2): 2756.

Richard L. Fox , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.

Richard L. Fox , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.

Richard L. Fox , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 5973.

Richard L. Fox , Jennifer L. Lawless , and Courtney Feeley . 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–35.

Sarah Fulton . 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–14.

Sarah Fulton . 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Mirco-mechanisms.” Political Behaviour 36 (3): 605630.

Elizabeth Gidengil , Janine Giles , and Melanee Thomas . 2008. “The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States. Gender & Politics 4 (4): 535–61.

Danny Hayes , and Jennifer L. Lawless . 2015. “A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 95118.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkildsen . 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.

Mona Lena Krook . 2010. “Why are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.

Mona Lena Krook , and Diana Z. O'Brien . 2012. “All the President's Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 840–55.

Jennifer L. Lawless 2009. “Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 7080.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Richard L. Fox . 2005. It Takes a Candidate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Richard L. Fox . 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jennifer L. Lawless , and Kathryn Pearson . 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Under-Representation: Re–Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 6782.

Becca Levy . 1996. “Improving Memory in Old Age through Implicit Self- Stereotyping.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (6): 10921107.

Jeremy D. Mayer , and Heather M. Schmidt . 2004. “Gendered Political Socialization in Four Contexts: Political Interest and Values among Junior High School Students in China, Japan, Mexico, and the United States.” The Social Science Journal 41 (3): 393407.

Matthew S. McGlone , Joshua Aronson , and Diane Kobrynowicz . 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (4): 392–98.

Pippa Norris , and Joni Lovenduski . 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kathryn Pearson , and Eric McGhee . 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics and Gender 9 (4): 439–62.

Scott Pruysers , and Julie Blais . 2014. “Anything Women Can Do Men Can Do Better: An Experiment Examining the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Political Knowledge and Efficacy.” The Social Science Journal 51 (3): 341–49.

Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2006. “Do Parties Know that ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 431–50.

Kira Sanbonmatsu , and Kathleen Dolan . 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–94.

Eric R. A. N. Smith , and Richard L. Fox . 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.

Steven J. Spencer , Claude M. Steele , and Diane M. Quinn . 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 428.

Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson . 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5): 797811.

Matthew J. Streb , Barbara Burrell , Brian Frederick , and Michael A. Genovese . 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 7689.

Melanee Thomas . 2012. “The Complexity Conundrum: Why Hasn't the Gender Gap in Subjective Political Competence Closed?Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 337–58.

Manon Tremblay . 1998. “Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada's 35th Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 435–65.

Manon Tremblay . 2007. “Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis.” Democratization 14 (4): 533–53.

Linda Trimble . 2007. “Gender, Political Leadership and Media Visibility: Globe and Mail Coverage of Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Contests.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 969–93.

Craig Volden , Alan E. Wiseman , and Dana E. Wittmer . 2013. “When are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–41.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Pruysers and Blais supplementary material
Pruysers and Blais supplementary material

 Word (75 KB)
75 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 27
Total number of PDF views: 106 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 459 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th October 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.