Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-6vg6l Total loading time: 0.316 Render date: 2022-12-06T20:42:12.607Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Islam's Political Disadvantage: Corruption and Religiosity in Quetta, Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2016

Michael Kalin*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Niloufer Siddiqui*
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michael Kalin, Department of Political Science, Yale University, Rosenkranz Hall, 115 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520, E-mail: michael.kalin@yale.edu; or to Niloufer Siddiqui, Department of Political Science, Yale University, Rosenkranz Hall, 115 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail: niloufer.siddiqui@yale.edu.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michael Kalin, Department of Political Science, Yale University, Rosenkranz Hall, 115 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520, E-mail: michael.kalin@yale.edu; or to Niloufer Siddiqui, Department of Political Science, Yale University, Rosenkranz Hall, 115 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail: niloufer.siddiqui@yale.edu.

Abstract

Religion is often seen as important to voting behavior, particularly in the Islamic world, where personal piety may serve as an informational shortcut to voters otherwise unclear about candidate quality. But how do voters react when nominally pious candidates are alleged to be corrupt? Are pious candidates evaluated differently according to their sectarian affiliations? To investigate the impact of candidate piety and sectarian identity on voter choice, we conducted a survey experiment in Quetta, Balochistan, a region of Pakistan, which has experienced high levels of Sunni-Shia violence. Our results suggest that voters are significantly more punitive of corrupt behavior committed by candidates from sectarian out-groups than those belonging to their religious in-group. Further, we demonstrate that respondents react negatively to information about candidate religiosity, and uncover the existence of a “hypocrisy effect” whereby voters disproportionately punish corrupt candidates purporting to be pious compared to candidates who make no such claims.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Pande, Rohini. 2007. “Parochial Politics: Ethnic Preferences and Politician Corruption.” Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper RWP07-031.Google Scholar
Beets, Douglas S. 2007. “Global Corruption and Religion: An Empirical Examination.” Journal of Global Ethics 3:6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhari, Farhan. 2015. “Mass Tax Avoidance Chokes Pakistan Economy.” Financial Times, June 3.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 2007. “The Importance of Being We: Human Nature and Intergroup Relations.” American Psychologist 62:728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E, Green, John C, and Layman, Geoffrey C. 2011. “The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 55:4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Eric, and Kerr, Nicholas. 2009. “Do Voters Have Different Attitudes toward Corruption? The Sources and Implications of Popular Perceptions and Tolerance of Political Corruption.” In Afrobarometer Working Papers Series. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy J., and Robinson, Robert V. 2006. “The Egalitarian Face of Islamic Orthodoxy: Support for Islamic Law and Economic Justice in Seven Muslim-Majority Nations.” American Sociological Review 7:167190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La O, Ana, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2008. “Does Religion Distract the Poor?: Income and Issue Voting around the World.” Comparative Political Studies 41:437476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Ensminger, Jean, McElreath, Richard, Barr, Abigail, Barrett, Clark, Bolyanatz, Alexander, Cardenas, Juan Camilo, Gurven, Michael, Gwako, Edwins, Henrich, Natalie, Lesorogol, Carolyn, Marlowe, Frank, Tracer, David, and Ziker., John 2010. “Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment.” Science 327, (5972):14801484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahl, Sigrun. 2009. “Religious Doctrines and Poor Relief: A Different Causal Pathway.” In Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare States, eds. van Kersbergen, Kees, and Manow, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 267296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Zarar, and Toosi, Nahal. 2010. “Pakistani Politics Shaken by Fake Degree Scandal.” The Associated Press, June 30.Google Scholar
Lambsdorff, Johann Graf. 2002. “An Empirical Approach.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61:829853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2010. “Ethnicity and the Willingness to Sanction Violent Politicians: Evidence from Kenya.” In Afrobarometer Working Papers Series. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Lewisohn, L. 2012. “Takwa” In The Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, eds. Th. Bianquis, Bearman, Bosworth, C.E., van Donzel, E., Heinrichs, W.P.. Brill Online, 2016. www.brill.com/publications/online-resources/encyclopaedia-islam-online (Accessed on May 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1844] 1977. Critique of Hegel's’ Philosophy of Right’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masoud, Tarek. 2014. Counting Islam: Religion, Class, and Elections in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, John F. 2014. “The Political Mobilization of Ethnic and Religious Identities in Africa.” American Political Science Review 108:801816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClendon, Gwyneth, and Riedl, Rachel. 2015. “Religion as a Stimulant for Political Participation: Evidence from an Experiment in Nairobi, Kenya.” The Journal of Politics, 77:10451057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, Ara. 2014. “Does Religion Make People Moral?Behaviour 151:365384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, Ara, and Shariff, Azim F.. 2008. “The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality.” Science 322:5862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paldam, Martin. 2001. “Corruption and Religion Adding to the Economic Model.” Kyklos 54:383413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B., Liddle, R. William, and Mujani, Saiful. 2012. “Testing Islam's Political Advantage: Evidence from Indonesia.” American Journal of Political Science 56:584600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph-Seng, Brandon, and Nielsen, Michael E.. 2007. “Honesty: One Effect of Primed Religious Representations.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 17:303315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachdev, I., and Bourhis, Richard. 1984. “Minimal Majorities and Minorities.” European Journal of Social Psychology 14:3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2006. “Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1:255286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, Moses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103:147174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, Harvey, O. J., Jack White, B., Hood, William R., and Sherif, Carolyn W.. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Vol. 10. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Simon, B., and Brown, Rupert. 1987. “Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:703711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Udi, Ben-Nun Bloom, Pazit, and Arikan, Gizem. 2013. “Does Faith Limit Immorality? The Politics of Religion and Corruption.” Democratization 20:287309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosis, Richard, and Ruffle, Bradley J.. 2003. “Religious Ritual and Cooperation: Testing for a Relationship on Israeli Religious and Secular Kibbutzim1.” Current Anthropology 44:713–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C.. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 33:74.Google Scholar
Torgler, Benno. 2006. “The Importance of Faith: Tax Morale and Religiosity.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61:81109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism: And Other Writings. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2002. “Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science.” American Political Science Review 96:713728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. 2002. Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism and Political Change in Egypt. New York, NYP: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Islam's Political Disadvantage: Corruption and Religiosity in Quetta, Pakistan
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Islam's Political Disadvantage: Corruption and Religiosity in Quetta, Pakistan
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Islam's Political Disadvantage: Corruption and Religiosity in Quetta, Pakistan
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *