Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Americans' Views of Muslims and Mormons: A Social Identity Theory Approach

  • James M. Penning (a1)

Although American society is religiously pluralistic, not all religious groups enjoy equal levels of public approval and support. Indeed, America has a history of viewing members of nontraditional religious groups with considerable distrust and suspicion. Two religious groups in particular — Muslims and Mormons — have come under fire in recent years, though not necessarily for the same reasons. Muslims and Mormons have frequently been viewed as outside the mainstream of American culture and, perhaps for that reason, have suffered from discrimination, threats, and violence. This article examines Americans' views of these two important and rapidly growing groups, using social identity theory as the primary vehicle of analysis. The theory proves useful in helping us explain variance in Americans' views of these two groups. While a variety of social, political and religious variables help to explain Americans' views of Muslims and Mormons, religious variables have the greatest impact.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint request to: James Penning, Department of Political Science, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI 49546. Email:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C.D. Batson , J. Chang , R. Orr , and J. Rowland . 2002. “Empathy, Attitudes and Action: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Motivate One to Help the Group?Personality & Social Psychology 28:16561666.

R Cimino . 2005. “No God in Common: American Evangelical Discourse on Islam after 9/11.” Review of Religious Research 47: 162173.

Pamela Johnston Conover , Karen A. Mingst , and Lee Sigelman . 1980. “Mirror-Images in Americans' Perceptions of Nations and Leaders during the Iranian Hostage Crisis.” Journal of Peace Research 17: 325337.

Melissa Deckman , Sue E.S. Crawford , and Laura R. Olson . 2008. “The Politics of Gay Rights and the Gender Gap; A Perspective on the Clergy.Politics and Religion 1:384410.

Alice H. Eagly , and Maureen Crowley . 1986. “Gender and Helping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature.Psychological Bulletin 100:283308.

Joshua Gamson . 1995. “Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct?Social Problems 42: 390407.

James L Gibson . 2006. “Enigmas of Intolerance: Fifty Years after Stouffer's Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties.Perspectives on Politics 4:2134.

R. Kenneth Godwin , Jennifer Godwin , and Martinez-Ebers . 2004. “Civic Socialization in Public and Fundamentalist Schools.Social Science Quarterly 85: 10971111.

Ewa A. Golebiowska 1999. “Gender Gap in Political Tolerance.Political Behavior 21: 4366.

Steven Greene . 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.Social Science Quarterly 85:136153.

Kevin A. Hill 1993. “The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policymaking: Congressional Voting and American Mass Attitudes Toward South Africa.International Studies Quarterly 37:195214.

Kay F. McFarland , and Donna R. Rhoades . 1998. “Gender-related values and medical specialty choice.Academic Psychiatry 22 (December):236–9.

Drew Nesdale , K. Durkin , K. Maass , and J. Griffiths . 2004. “Group Status, Outgroup Ethnicity and Children's' Ethnic Attitudes.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 25: 237251.

Miroslav Nincic , and Bruce Russett . 1979. “Effect of Similarity and Interest on Attitudes Toward Foreign Countries.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43: 6878.

Wade C. Rowatt , Lewis M. Franklin , and Marla Cotton . 2005. “Patterns and Personality Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Christians and Muslims.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44:2943.

Robert Y. Shapiro , and Harpreet Mahajan . 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.Public Opinion Quarterly 50:4261.

H Tajfel . 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.Annual Review of Psychology 33:139.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 248 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.