Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Campbell, David E. Green, John C. and Monson, J. Quin 2012. The Stained Glass Ceiling: Social Contact and Mitt Romney’s “Religion Problem”. Political Behavior, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 277.


    ×

An Experimental Investigation of Causal Attributions for the Political Behavior of Muslim Candidates: Can a Muslim Represent you?

  • Eileen Braman (a1) and Abdulkader H. Sinno (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755048309000224
  • Published online: 01 April 2009
Abstract
Abstract

American Muslim representation in elected office has lagged behind that of other groups of comparable size. Muslims now make up 2% of the total United States population and enjoy much larger concentrations in some urban areas. American Muslims are also disproportionately educated and enjoy a higher average socio-economic status than members of groups with similar numbers that have made strides in terms of political representation in our democracy. Yet Muslims have not made similar advances in the political arena. There are a number of reasons that might account for this situation. Here, we look at one possible explanation that is especially intriguing — and perhaps a bit troubling: the idea that voters make different causal attributions for the behavior of Muslim candidates for office. We employ an experimental design to examine the attributions participants use to “explain” the behavior of hypothetical Muslim and non-Muslim candidates. We conduct two experiments involving distinct political offices: State Attorney General and United States Senator. We find that respondents generally do not attribute behavior differently in the case of Muslim and Christian candidates, except in the case of lax prosecution of a terrorism case. Politically sophisticated respondents assume that a Muslim prosecutor who does not have a large Muslim constituency is sympathetic to Muslim terrorists, but not one with a larger Muslim voting base. Non-sophisticates attribute his behavior to such motivations regardless of the concentration of Muslims in his district.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondences and reprint requests to: Eileen Braman, Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. E-mail: ebraman@indiana.edu. Abdulkader Sinno, Department of Political Science & Middle Eastern Studies, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. E-mail: asinno@indiana.edu.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Deborah Alexander , and Kristi Anderson . 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46:527545.

David E Campbell . 2006. “The Religious “Threat” in Contemporary American Elections.” Journal of Politics 68:104115.

Brad Gomez , and J. Matthew Wilson . 2000. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science 45:899914.

Brad Gomez , and J. Matthew Wilson . 2006. “Rethinking Symbolic Racism: Evidence of Attribution Bias.” Journal of Politics 68:611625.

Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad , ed. 2002. Muslims in the West: From Sojourners to Citizens. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

Leonie Huddy , and Nayda Terkidsen . 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37:119147.

Shanto Iyengar . 1989. “How Citizens Think about National Issues: A Matter of Responsibility.” American Journal of Political Science 33:878900.

Kathleen McGraw . 1998. “Manipulating Public Opinion with Moral Justification.” Annals of the American Academy of Political Science 560:120142.

Kathleen McGraw , Karen Stenner Mark Fische , and Milton Lodge . 1996. “What's in a Word? Bias Trait Descriptions of Political Leaders.” Political Behavior 18: 263287.

Jeffery Mondak . 2001. “Developing Knowledge Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 45:224238.

Thomas E Nelson . 1999. “Group Affect and Attribution in Social Policy.” Journal of Politics 61:331362.

Mark Peffley . 1984. “The Voter as Juror: Attributing Responsibility for Economic Conditions.” Political Behavior 6:275294.

Thomas F Pettigrew . 1979. “The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis to Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5: 461–76.

Elaine B Sharp ., and Mark Joslyn . 2001. “Individual and Contextual Effects on Attributions about Pornography.” Journal of Politics 63:501519.

Carol K Sigelman ., Barbara J. Walkoz Lee Sigelman , and Michael Nits . 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understading Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science 39:243265.

Tom Smith . 2002. “The Polls-Review: The Muslim Population of the United States: The Methodology of Estimates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66:404417.

D.M. Taylor , and V. Jaggi 1974. “Ethnocentrism and Causal Attribution in a South Indian Context.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 5:162171.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×