Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Religion, Gendered Authority, and Identity in American Politics

  • Erin C. Cassese (a1) and Mirya R. Holman (a2)
Abstract

Religious identity serves as a central cleavage in American politics. However, little attention has been granted to how gendered views of authority conveyed in religious doctrine shape political identities and attitudes. Using a nation-wide sample of adult Americans, we demonstrate that gendered notions of divine and human authority exert considerable influence on political thinking. In particular, belief in a masculine God and preferences for traditional gender roles strongly relate to political conservatism. Adherence to gendered notions of authority influences political identity and policy preferences, even when controlling for more conventional indicators of religiosity. Accounting for gendered beliefs about authority also partially explains well-documented gender gaps in American politics, providing insight into women's apparently contradictory tendencies toward both political liberalism and religiosity. The relationships uncovered here, coupled with the continued salience of both gender and religion in contemporary political campaigns, underscore the importance of attending to the gendered dimensions of authority.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Religion, Gendered Authority, and Identity in American Politics
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Religion, Gendered Authority, and Identity in American Politics
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Religion, Gendered Authority, and Identity in American Politics
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Erin C. Cassese, Department of Political Science, West Virginia University, 316 Woodburn Hall, Morgantown, WV 26506. E-mail: erin.cassese@mail.wvu.edu; or to Mirya R. Holman, Department of Political Science, Tulane University, 6823 Saint Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70118-5669 E-mail: mholman@tulane.edu.
Footnotes
Hide All
The authors would like to thank Melissa Deckman, Nichole Bauer, and the Gender and Political Psychology Writing Group for their comments on earlier drafts of this article.
Footnotes
References
Hide All
AAPOR. 2011. “Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys.” http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Standard_Definitions2&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3156 (Accessed on May 17, 2016).
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bader, Christopher, and Froese, Paul. 2005. “Images of God: The Effect of Personal Theologies on Moral Attitudes, Political Affiliation, and Religious Behavior.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 1:124.
Barker, David C., and Tinnick, James D.. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constraint.” American Political Science Review 100:249263.
Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. 1986. “Moderator-Mediator Variables Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:11731182.
Barringer, Mandi Nicole, Gay, David A., and Lynxwiler, John P.. 2013. “Gender, Religiosity, Spirituality, and Attitudes toward Homosexuality.” Sociological Spectrum 33:240257.
Bartkowski, John P., and Hempel, Lynn M.. 2009. “Sex and Gender Traditionalism Among Conservative Protestants: Does the Difference Make a Difference?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48:805816.
Baylor University. 2007. The Baylor Religion Survey, Wave II. Waco, TX: Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion [producer].
Brasher, Brenda E. 1998. Godly Women: Fundamentalism and Female Power. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Burke, Kelsy C. 2012. “Women's Agency in Gender-Traditional Religions: A Review of Four Approaches.” Sociology Compass 6:122133.
Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 1999. “The Image of God: Black Theology and Racial Empowerment in the African American Community.” Review of Religious Research 40:197212.
Calfano, Brian R., and Djupe, Paul A.. 2011. “Not in His Image: The Moderating Effect of Gender on Religious Appeals.” Politics & Religion 4:338354.
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2016. “Religious Beliefs, Gender Consciousness, and Women's Political Participation.” Sex Roles OnlineOnly. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0635-9.
Christ, Carol P. 1987. “Why Women Need the Goddess: Phenomenological, Psychological, and Political Reflections.” In Women's Studies in Religion: A Multicultural Reader, eds. Bagley, Kate, and McIntosh, Kathleen. New York, NY: Pearson, 273287.
Daly, Mary. 1985. Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women's Liberation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
De Roos, Simone A., Iedema, Jurjen, and Miedema, Siebren. 2004. “Influence of Maternal Denomination, God Concepts, and Child-Rearing Practices on Young Children's God Concepts.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43:519535.
di Mauro, Diane, and Joffe, Carole. 2007. “The Religious Right and the Reshaping of Sexual Policy: An examination of reproductive rights and sexuality education.” Sexuality Research & Social Policy 4:6792.
Driskell, Robyn, Embry, Elizabeth, and Lyon, Larry. 2008. “Faith and Politics: The Influence of Religious Beliefs on Political Participation.” Social Science Quarterly 89:294314.
Eagly, Alice H., and Mladinic, Antonio. 1994. “Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence.” European Review of Social Psychology 5:135.
Froese, Paul, and Bader, Christopher. 2008. “Unraveling Religious Worldviews: The Relationship between Images of God and Political Ideology in a Cross-Cultural Analysis.” The Sociological Quarterly 49:689718.
Froese, Paul, and Bader, Christopher. 2010. America's Four Gods: What We Say about God – and What That Says about Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Froese, Paul, Bader, Christopher, and Smith, Buster. 2008. “Political Tolerance and God's Wrath in the United States.” Sociology of Religion 69:2944.
Gallagher, Sally K. 2004. “The Marginalization of Evangelical Feminism.” Sociology of Religion 65:215237.
Gorsuch, Richard L. 1984. “Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating religion.” American Psychologist 39:228236.
Greeley, Andrew M. 1988. “Evidence That a Maternal Image of God Correlates with Liberal Politics.” Sociology and Social Research 72:150154.
Greeley, Andrew M. 1995. Religion as Poetry. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Griffith, R. Marie. 1997. God's Daughters: Evangelical Women and the Power of Submission. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Groothuis, Rebecca Merrill. 1993. Women Caught in the Conflict: The Culture War between Traditionalism and Feminism. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
Haidt, Jonathan, and Graham, Jesse. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20:98116.
Hall, Daniel E., Meador, Keith G., and Koenig, Harold G.. 2008. “Measuring Religiousness in Health Research.” Journal of Religion and Health 47:134163.
Hekman, Susan. 1995. “Subjects and Agents: The Question for Feminism.” In Provoking Agents: Gender and Agency in Theory and Practice, ed. Gardiner, Judith Kegan. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 194207.
Hoffmann, John P., and Bartkowski, John P.. 2008. “Gender, Religious Tradition, and Biblical Literalism.” Social Forces 86:12451272.
Holman, Mirya R, Schneider, Monica, and Pondel, Kristin. 2015. “Gender Targeting in Political Advertisements.” Political Research Quarterly 68:816829.
Huddy, Leonie, Cassese, Erin, and Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2008. “Gender, Public Opinion, and Political Reasoning.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 3149.
Hunter, James. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Jamal, Amaney. 2005. “Mosques, Collective Identity, and Gender Differences among Arab American Muslims.” Journal of Middle East Women's Studies 1:5878.
Jelen, Ted G. 1990. “Religious Belief and Attitude Constraint.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 29:118125.
Kaufmann, Karen M. 2002. “Culture Wars, Secular Realignment, and the Gender Gap in Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24:283307.
Kaufmann, Karen M., and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43:864887.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., Green, John C., Smidt, Corwin E., and Guth, James L.. 1996. “The Puzzle of Evangelical Protestantism: Core, Periphery, and Political Behavior.” In Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front, eds. Kellstedt, Lyman, Guth, James, Green, John, and Smidt, Corwin. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 240266.
Kelley, Jonathan, and De Graaf, Nan Dirk. 1997. “National Context, Parental Socialization, and Religious Belief: Results from 15 Nations.” American Sociological Review 62:639659.
Kinder, D.R., and Sears, D.O.. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40:414.
Klemp, Nathaniel J. 2010. “The Christian Right: Engaged Citizens or Theocratic Crusaders?Politics & Religion 3:127.
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Layman, Geoffrey C. 1997. “Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 61:288316.
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Lewis, Andrew R. 2014Abortion Politics and the Decline of the Separation of Church and State: The Southern Baptist Case.” Politics & Religion 7:521549.
Mallery, Paul, Mallery, Suzanne, and Gorsuch, Richard. 2000. “A Preliminary Taxonomy of Attributions to God.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 10: 135156.
Mencken, F. Carson, and Fitz, Brittany. 2013. “Image of God and Community Volunteering among Religious Adherents in the United States.” Review of Religious Research 55: 491508.
Merolla, Jennifer, Schroedel, Jean Reith, and Holman, Mirya R.. 2007. “The Paradox of Protestantism and Women in Elected Office in the United States.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 29:77100.
Miller, Alan S., and Hoffmann, John P.. 1995. “Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34:6375.
Miller, Alan S., and Stark, Rodney. 2002. “Gender and Religiousness: Can Socialization Explanations Be Saved?American Journal of Sociology 107:13991423.
Morton, Nelle. 1989. “The Goddess as Metaphoric Image.” In Women's Studies in Religion: A Multicultural Reader, eds. McIntosh, Kathleen and Bagley, Kate. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 192197.
Newport, Frank. 2011. “More Than 9 in 10 Americans Continue to Believe in God.” http://www.gallup.com/poll/147887/americans-continue-believe-god.aspx (Accessed on May 5, 2016).
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2008. “The Gender Gap in Ideology.” Political Behavior 30:503523.
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ondercin, Heather L., and Bernstein, Jeffrey L.. 2007. “Context Matters: The Influence of State and Campaign Factors on the Gender Gap in Senate Elections, 1988–2000.” Politics & Gender 3:3353.
Peek, Charles W., Lowe, George D., and Williams, L. Susan. 1991. “Gender and God's Word: Another Look at Religious Fundamentalism and Sexism.” Social Forces 69:12051221.
Pevey, Carolyn, Williams, Christine L., and Ellison, Christopher G.. 1996. “Male God Imagery and Female Submission: Lessons from a Southern Baptist Ladies’ Bible Class.” Qualitative Sociology 19:173193.
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2012. “How the Faithful Voted: 2012 Preliminary Analysis.” http://www.pewforum.org/2012/11/07/how-the-faithful-voted-2012-preliminary-exit-poll-analysis/ (Accessed on May 5, 2016).
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2012. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Reese, Laura A., and Brown, Ronald E.. 1995. “The Effects of Religious Messages on Racial Identity and System Blame among African Americans.” Journal of Politics 57:2443.
Scheitle, Christopher P., and Adamczyk, Amy. 2009. “It Takes Two: The Interplay of Individual and Group Theology on Social Embeddedness.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48:1629.
Sobel, Michael E. 1982. “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models.” Sociological methodology 13:290312.
Stark, Rodney. 2001. “Gods, Rituals, and the Moral Order.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40:619636.
Steensland, Brian, Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox, W. Bradford, Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces 79:291318.
Stroope, Samuel, Draper, Scott, and Whitehead, Andrew L.. 2013. “Images of a Loving God and Sense of Meaning in Life.” Social Indicators Research 111:2544.
Trzebiatowska, Marta, and Bruce, Steve. 2012. Why Are Women More Religious Than Men? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tolleson Rinehart, Sue, and Perkins, Jerry. 1989. “The Intersection of Gender Politics and Religious Beliefs.” Political Behavior 11:3356.
Wald, Kenneth, and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2014. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Weiner, Bernard. 1985. “An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion.” Psychological Review 92:548573.
Whitehead, Andrew L. 2012. “Gender Ideology and Religion: Does a Masculine Image of God Matter?Review of Religious Research 54:139156.
Whitehead, Andrew L. 2014. “Male and Female He Created Them: Gender Traditionalism, Masculine Images of God, and Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Unions.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53:479496.
Wilcox, Bradley. 2004. Soft Patriarchs, New Men. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wuthnow, Robert. 1989a. The Struggle for America's Soul: Evangelicals, Liberals, and Secularism. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Wuthnow, Robert. 1989b. The Restructuring of American Religion: Society and Faith since World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Cassese and Holman supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (157 KB)
157 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 45
Total number of PDF views: 211 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 922 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 29th December 2016 - 18th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.