Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists

  • Ryan P. Burge (a1) and Andrew R. Lewis (a2)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.
Abstract

Evangelicals garner much attention in polling and public opinion research, yet measuring white evangelicals remains elusive, even opaque. This paper provides practical guidance to researchers who want to measure or analyze evangelicals. In the social sciences, many have adopted a detailed religious affiliation approach that categorizes evangelicals based on the religious tradition of the denominations to which they belong. Others have used a simpler self-identification scheme, which asks respondents if they consider themselves “born-again or evangelical”. While the affiliation and self-identification schemes are predominant, a practical examination of these approaches has been absent. Using several waves of the General Social Survey and the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we compare them. We find almost no statistical differences between the two measurements in prominent demographic, political, or religious factors. Thus, we suggest that for most a simple question about broad religious affiliation followed by a born-again or evangelical self-identification question will suffice.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Measuring Evangelicals: Practical Considerations for Social Scientists
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Andrew R. Lewis, Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, USA. E-mail: Andrew.Lewis@uc.edu
References
Hide All
Alwin, Duane F., Felson, Jacob L., Walker, Edward T., and Tufis, Paula. 2006. “Measuring Religious Identities in Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4):530564.
Bailey, Sarah Pulliam. 2016. “White Evangelicals Voted Overwhelmingly for Donald Trump, Exit Polls Show.” Washington Post. November 6, 2016, sec. Acts of Faith. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/11/09/exit-polls-show-white-evangelicals-voted-overwhelmingly-for-donald-trump/?utm_term=.5502298b9887.
Bebbington, David W. 1988. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History From the 1730s to the 1980s. Revised ed. London: Routledge.
Burge, Ryan P. 2017. “The 2016 Religious Vote (for More Groups than You Thought Possible).” Religion in Public (blog). March 10, 2017. https://religioninpublic.blog/2017/03/10/the-2016-religious-vote-for-more-groups-than-you-thought-possible/.
Dougherty, Kevin D., Johnson, Byron R., and Polson, Edward C.. 2007. “Recovering the Lost: Remeasuring U.S. Religious Affiliation.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46(4):483499.
Eskridge, Larry. 2006. “Defining Evangelicalism.” http://www2.wheaton.edu/isae/defining_evangelicalism.html.
Evans, John H. 2002. “Polarization in Abortion Attitudes in U.S. Religious Traditions, 1972–1998.” Sociological Forum 17:397422.
Frendreis, John, and Raymond, Tatalovich. 2011. “Validating Protestant Denominational Classifications Using the Chaves Inerrancy Scale.” Politics and Religion 4(2):355365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048311000150.
Green, John C., Guth, James L., Smidt, Corwin E., and Kellstedt, Lyman E.. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Hackett, Conrad, and Lindsay, D. Michael. 2008. “Measuring Evangelicalism: Consequences of Different Operationalization Strategies.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47(3):499514.
Hunter, James Davison. 1981. “Operationalizing Evangelicalism: A Review, Critique & Proposal.” Sociology of Religion 42(4):363372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711547.
Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. “Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes Toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56(4):489.
Kellstedt, Lyman, and Smidt, Corwin. 1991. “Measuring Fundamentalism: An Analysis of Different Operational Strategies.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30(3):259278. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386972.
Lewis, Andrew R., and De Bernardo, Dana Huyser. 2010. “Belonging Without Belonging: Utilizing Evangelical Self-Identification to Analyze Political Attitudes and Preferences.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49(1):112126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01495.x.
Lipka, Michael. 2016. “U.S. Religious Groups and Their Political Leanings.” Pew Research Center (blog). February 23, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/.
Markoe, Lauren. 2016. “White Evangelicals, Catholics and Mormons Carried Trump.” Religion News Service. November 9, 2016. http://religionnews.com/2016/11/09/white-evangelicals-white-catholics-and-mormons-voted-decisively-for-trump/.
Marsden, George. 1990. Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism. Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans.
Mattingly, Terry. 2013. “Defining Evangelical, or Not, in 2013.” Uexpress. January 11, 2013. http://www.uexpress.com/on-religion/2013/1/11/defining-evangelical-or-not-in-2013.
Noll, Mark A. 2010. The Rise of Evangelicalism: The Age of Edwards, Whitefield and the Wesleys. Downer's Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
Schmalzbauer, John. 2002. People of Faith: Religious Conviction in American Journalism and Higher Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Shellnutt, Kate. 2016. “Trump Elected President, Thanks to 4 in 5 White Evangelicals.” Gleanings|ChristianityToday.Com. November 9, 2016. http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2016/november/trump-elected-president-thanks-to-4-in-5-white-evangelicals.html.
Smidt, Corwin. 1988. “Evangelicals within Contemporary American Politics: Differentiating between Fundamentalist and Non-Fundamentalist Evangelicals.” Western Political Quarterly 41(3):601620.
Smietana, Bob. 2015. “What Is an Evangelical? Four Questions Offer New Definition.” Gleanings|ChristianityToday.Com. November 19, 2015. http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2015/november/what-is-evangelical-new-definition-nae-lifeway-research.html.
Smith, Christian S. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Gregory A., and Martinez, Jessica. 2016. “How the Faithful Voted: A Preliminary 2016 Analysis.” Pew Research Center (blog). November 9, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/.
Smith, Tom W. 1990. “Classifying Protestant Denominations.” Review of Religious Research 31(3):225245.
Steensland, Brian, , Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art, The.” Social Forces 79:291.
Stetzer, Ed, and Burge, Ryan P.. 2016. “Reltrad Coding Problems and A New Repository.” Politics and Religion 9(1):187190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048315000929.
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Vavreck, Lynn, and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(4):355366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802305177.
Wald, Kenneth D., and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2006. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Whalin, W. Terry. 2014. Billy Graham: A Biography of America's Greatest Evangelist. Garden City, NY: Morgan James Faith.
“What Is an Evangelical?” n.d. National Association of Evangelicals. Accessed March 14, 2017. https://www.nae.net/what-is-an-evangelical/.
Woodberry, Robert D., Park, Jerry Z., Kellstedt, Lyman A., Regnerus, Mark D., and Steensland, Brian. 2012. “The Measure of American Religious Traditions: Theoretical and Measurement Considerations.” Social Forces 91(1):6573.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Burge and Lewis supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (353 KB)
353 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed