Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The “Radiating Effects” of the ECtHR on Social Mobilizations Around Religion and Education in Europe: An Analytical Frame

  • Effie Fokas (a1) (a2) and Dia Anagnostou (a1) (a3)
Abstract

A growing non-legal scholarship explores the domestic implementation of international court judgments in national law and policy. Yet little attention has been paid to the indirect effects of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law: namely, the ways in which its judgments may raise public consciousness, change how social actors articulate their claims, and/or prompt mobilization among civil society actors. This paper conceptualizes the significance of the indirect effects of ECtHR judgments in the domain of religion and education. Drawing on a constitutive approach to the law it explains the potential impact of such indirect effects. Second, it presents analytical concepts such as legal mobilization, which underpin the country-based case studies included in this symposium. Third, it provides an overview of the ECtHR religion and education-related case law which sets the stage for examining the nature and effects of the shadow of that case law in different country contexts.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Effie Fokas, Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP), Vassilisis Sofias 49, Athens 10676, Greece. E-mail: esfokas@eliamep.gr
References
Hide All
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law – Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Alter, Karen, Helfer, Laurence, and Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2016. “How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79(1):136.
Anagnostou, Dia, ed. 2013. The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg's Judgments on Domestic Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Anagnostou, Dia, and Fokas, Effie. 2015. “The ‘radiating effects’ of the European Court of Human Rights on social mobilisations around religion in Europe – an analytical frame”. Grassrootsmobilise working paper accessible online at http://grassrootsmobilise.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/GRM-Working-Paper-1-Radiating-Effects.pdf.
Anagnostou, Dia, and Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia. 2013. “Under What Conditions do National Authorities Implement the ECtHR's Rulings?.” In The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg's Judgments on Domestic Policy, ed. Anagnostou, Dia. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 143165.
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1):611639.
Benvenisti, Eyal. 1999. “Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards”. International Law and Politics 31(4):843854.
Cassel, Douglass. 2001. “Does International Human Rights Law Make A Difference?”. Chicago Journal of International Law 2(1):121136.
Cichowski, Rachel. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society – Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cichowski, Rachel. 2013. “Civil Society and the European Court of Human Rights.” In The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, eds. Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7797.
Den Dulk, Kevin R. 2006. “In Legal Culture, but Not of It: The Role of Cause Lawyers in Evangelical Legal Mobilization”. In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, eds. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stuart A.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 197219.
Durham, W. Cole Jr., Torfs, Rik, Kirkham, David M. and Scott, Christine, eds. 2012. Islam, Europe and Emerging Legal Issues. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.
Evans, Carolyn. 2001. Freedom of Religion Under the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, Carolyn, and Thomas, Christopher. 2006. “Church-State Relations in the European Court of Human Rights”. Brigham Young University Law Review 2006(3):699725.
Evans, Malcolm. 2008. “Freedom of Religion and the European Convention on Human Rights: Approaches, Trends and Tensions”. In Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context, eds. Cane, Peter, Evans, Carolyn and Robinson, Zoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 291316.
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1992. “Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors”. Law & Social Inquiry 17(4):745760.
Fokas, Effie. 2015. “Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence”. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 4(1):5474.
Fokas, Effie. 2016. “Comparative Susceptibility and Differential Effects on the Two European Courts: A Study of Grasstops Mobilizations Around Religion”, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5:541574.
Fokas, Effie. 2017a. The European Court of Human Rights at the Grassroots Level: Who Knows What About Religion at the ECtHR, and to What Effects?’, Religion, State and Society, 45:34.
Fokas, Effie. 2017b. “Kokkinakis at the Grassroots Level”, Religion & Human Rights 12(2–3):210222.
Fokas, Effie. 2017. “God's Advocates: The Multiple Fronts of the war on Blasphemy in Greece.” In Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression: Comparative, Theoretical and Historical Reflections After the Charlie Hebdo Massacre, eds. Temperman, Jeroen and Koltay, Andras. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 389410.
Galanter, Marc. 1983. “The Radiating Effects of Courts”. In Empirical Theories About Courts, eds. Boyum, Keith O. and Mather, Lynn M.. New York: Longman, 117142.
Goldhaber, Michael. 2009. A People's History of the European Court of Human Rights, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2012. “Implementing International Human Rights Law at Home: Domestic Politics and the European Court of Human Rights”. Human Rights Review 13(3):279301.
Hunter-Henin, Myriam. 2012. “Introduction. Religious Freedoms in European Schools: Contrasts and Convergence”. In Law, Religious Freedoms and Education in Europe, ed. Hunter-Henin, Myriam. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 133.
Hoover, Dennis R., and Kevin, , and den Dulk, R.. 2004. “Christian Conservatives Go to Court: Religion and Legal Mobilization in the United States and Canada”. International Political Science Review 25(1):934.
Johnson, Timothy R., and Martin, Andrew D.. 1998. “The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions”. American Political Science Review 92(2):299310.
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders – Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Keller, Helen, and Sweet, Alec Stone, eds. 2008. A Europe of Rights – The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krishnan, Jayanth K., and den Dulk, Kevin R.. 2002. “So Help Me God: A Comparative Study of Religious Interest Group Litigation”. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 30(2):233275.
Mancini, Susanna. 2010. “The Crucifix Rage: Supranational Constitutionalism Bumps Against the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty”. European Constitutional Law Review 6(1), 627.
McCann, Michael. 1992. “Reform Litigation on Trial”. Law & Social Inquiry 17(4):715743.
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work – Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCann, Michael. 2004. “Law and Social Movements”. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, Austin. Oxford: Blackwell, 506522.
McCann, Michael. 2006. “Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives”. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(1):1738.
NeJaime, Douglas. 2011. “Winning Through Losing”. Iowa Law Review 96(3):9411012.
Richardson, James T. 2015. “Managing Religion and the Judicialization of Religious Freedom”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54(1):119.
Richardson, James T., and Lee, Brian M.. 2014. “The Role of the Courts in the Social Construction of Religious Freedom in Central and Eastern Europe”. Review of Central and East European Law 39(3/4):291313.
Ringelheim, Julie. 2012. “Rights, Religion and the Public Sphere: The European Court of Human Rights in Search of A Theory?”. In Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas, eds. Zucca, Lorenzo and Ungureanu, Camil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283306.
Ringelheim, Julie. 2014. “Du Voile Au Crucifix: La Neutralité Confessionnelle de l'Etat Dans La Jurisprudence de La Cour Européenne Des Droits de L'homme”. CRIDHO Working Paper, Université catholique de Louvain, accessible online at http://cridho.uclouvain.be/documents/Working.Papers/CRIDHO-WP-2014-1-JRingelheim-DuVoileAuCrucifix.pdf.
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1992. “Hollow Hopes and Other Aspirations: A Reply to Feely and McCann”. Law and Social Inquiry 17(4):761778.
Sadurski, Wojciech. 2009. “Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments”. Human Rights Law Review 9(3):397453.
Scheingold, Stuart A. 2004. The Politics of Rights – Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
van den Eynde, Laura. 2013. ‘An Empirical Look at the Amicus Curiae Practice of Human Rights NGOs Before the European Court of Human RightsNetherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 31(3):271313.
Voeten, Erik. 2013. “Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts”. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14(2):411436.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed