Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Religion and Secularism among American Party Activists

  • Geoffrey C. Layman (a1) and Christopher L. Weaver (a1)

Abstract

Prior work has shown party activists and religious divisions to be two of the leading causes of party polarization in American politics. Using the Convention Delegate Studies, we examine the interaction between these two culprits and their impact on party polarization. We leverage a novel measure of secularism in the latest wave of the Convention Delegate Studies to demonstrate that active secularism is distinct both conceptually and statistically from low religiosity. Furthermore, we show that both religiosity and secularism drive party activists to take more extreme policy positions, to identify themselves as more ideologically extreme, and to exhibit less support for compromise. As the Democratic and Republican Parties have become more secular and religious, respectively, these results suggest religious polarization may compound existing divisions between the two parties and exacerbate the partisan divide in American politics.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Geoffrey C. Layman, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: glayman@nd.edu; or to: Christopher L. Wever, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: cweaver4@nd.edu

References

Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60:634652.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Andersen, T.W. 1957. “Maximum Likelihood Estimates for a Multivariate Normal Distribution When Some Observations are Missing.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 52:200203.
Aranson, Peter H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1972. “Spatial Strategies for Sequential Elections.” In Probability Models of Collective Decision Making, eds. Niemi, Richard, and Weisberg, Herbert. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Parties: Groups, Policy Demanders and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10:571597.
Bentler, P.M. 1990. “Comparative fit indexes in structural models.” Psychological Bulletin 107:238246.
Brewer, Mark D., and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2007. Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Browne, Mickael W., and Cudeck, Robert. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, eds. Bollen, Kenneth A., and Long, J. Scott. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brownstein, Ronald. 2007. The Second Civil War. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
Campbell, David E., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Green, John C.. 2013. “The Politics of Irreligion: The Political Causes of Growing Secularism in America.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Chappell, Henry W. Jr., and Keech, William R.. 1986. “Policy Motivation and Party Differences in a Dynamic Spatial Model of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 80:881900.
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Matthew Daniel. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Matthew Daniel. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin, and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64: 426448.
Dionne, E.J. Jr. 2004. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
Green, Donald P., and Citrin, Jack. 1994. “Measurement Error and the Structure of Attitudes: Are Positive and Negative Judgments Opposites?American Journal of Political Science 38:256281.
Green, John C. 2007. The Faith Factor: How Religion Influences American Elections. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Green, John C., Guth, James L., Smidt, Corwin E., and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Green, John C., and Jackson, John S.. 2007. “Faithful Divides: Party Elites and Religion.” In A Matter of Faith: Religion in the 2004 Presidential Election, ed. Campbell, David E. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Herrera, Richard. 1992. “The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 45:10211035.
Hout, Michael, and Fischer, Claude S.. 2002. “Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Politics and Generations.” American Sociological Review 67:165190.
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hunter, James Davison. 1994. Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America's Culture War. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2005. “Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 120:199218.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Falk, Erika. 2000. “Continuity and Change in Civility in the House.” In Polarized Politics, ed. Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 96108.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Green, John C.. 1993. “Knowing God's Many People: Denominational Preference and Political Behavior.” In Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, eds. Leege, David C., and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Kohut, Andrew, Green, John C., Keeter, Scott, and Toth, Robert C.. 2000. The Diminishing Divide: Religion's Changing Role in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2010. “Religion and Party Activists: A ‘Perfect Storm’ of Polarization or a Recipe for Pragmatism” In Religion and Democracy in the United States: Danger or Opportunity?, eds. Wolfe, Alan, and Katznelson, Ira. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 212254.
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46:786802.
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104:324346.
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Green, John C.. 2006. “Wars and Rumours of War: The Contexts of Cultural Conflict in American Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 36:6189.
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McTague, John Michael, and Layman, Geoffrey C.. 2009. “Religion, Parties, and Voting Behavior: A Political Explanation of Religious Influence.” In The Oxford Handbook on Religion and American Politics, eds. Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Guth, James L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Gary, and Schofield, Norman. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 97:245260.
Miller, Warren E., and Jennings, M. Kent. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York, NY: Sage.
Oldfield, Duane M. 1996. The Right and the Righteous: The Christian Right Confronts the Republican Party. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Ranney, Austin. 1972. “Turnout and Representation in Presidential Primary Elections.” American Political Science Review. 66:2137.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Saunders, Kyle L., and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.” American Politics Research 32:285309.
Schoettmer, Patrick L., Campbell, David E., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Green, John C.. 2011. “Secular America: The Dimensions of Secularism and their Political Consequences.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle.
Shafer, Byron E. 2003. The Two Majorities and the Puzzle of Modern American Politics. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Sherkat, Darren E. 2008. “Beyond Belief: Atheism, Agnosticism, and Theistic Certainty in the United States.” Sociological Spectrum 28:438459.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Guth, James L.. 2009. “The Role of Religion in American Politics: Explanatory Theories and Associated Analytical and Measurement Issues.” In The Oxford Handbook on Religion and American Politics, eds. Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Guth, James L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soule, John W., and Clarke, James W.. 1970. “Amateurs and Professionals: A Study of Delegates to the 1968 Democratic National Convention.” American Political Science Review 64:888898.
Steensland, Brian, Park, Jerry Z., Regnerus, Mark D., Robinson, Lynn D., Wilcox, W. Bradford, and Woodberry, Robert D.. 2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces 79:291318.
Stone, Walter J., and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1983. “Winning May Not Be Everything, but It's More Than We Thought.” American Political Science Review 77:945956.
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mack D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, John Kenneth. 2003. The Values Divide. New York, NY: Chatham House.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Robinson, Carin. 2011. Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1965. “The Goldwater Phenomenon: Purists, Politicians, and the Two-Party System.” Review of Politics 27:393399.
Wilson, James Q. 1962. The Amateur Democrat. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Layman and Weaver supplementary material
Layman and Weaver supplementary material 1

 Word (51 KB)
51 KB

Religion and Secularism among American Party Activists

  • Geoffrey C. Layman (a1) and Christopher L. Weaver (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.