Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Religious Freedom and Majority Rule: Marsilius of Padua “on” Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im and the “Secular” Islamic State

  • Bettina Koch (a1)
Abstract

This article discusses Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na‘im's Islam and the Secular State from the perspective of Marsilius of Padua's political theory. Both authors share similar concepts of the relationship between religion, state policy, and the state, and allow for the integration of religious doctrines into state law. Nonetheless, the Marsilian conception provides stronger protection of unbelievers' and religious dissenters' civic rights. In the broader discourse on political theory of rights, Marsilius argues in favors of individual rights and a protection of minority rights, while an-Na‘im's theory of Shari‘a reform suggests a preference for a people's self-determination.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Bettina Koch, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Political Science, 507 Major Williams Hall (0130) Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: bkoch@vt.edu
References
Hide All
Amanat, Abbas. 2007. “From Ijtihād to Wilāyat-i Faqīh: The Evolution of the Shiite Legal Authority to Political Power.” In Shari‘a: Islamic Law in the Contemporary Context, eds. Amanat, Abbas, and Griffel, Frank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 120136.
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1990. Towards an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1992. “Introduction,” in Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Quest for Consensus, ed. an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 115.
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 2006. African Constitutionalism and the Role of Islam. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 2008. Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari‘a. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Antonsich, Marco, and Jones, Phil I.. 2010. “Mapping the Swiss Referendum on the Minaret Ban.” Political Geography 29:5762.
Beitz, Charles R., and Goddin, Robert E.. 2009. “Introduction: Basic Rights and Beyond.” In Global Basic Rights, ed. Beitz, Charles R.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 124.
Dahl, Robert A. 1979. “Procedural Democracy.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, eds. Laslett, Peter, and Fishkin, James. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 97133.
Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 2006. On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dallmayr, Fred. 2008. “Comparative Political Theory: What is it Good for?” In Western Political Thought in Dialogue with Asia, eds. Shogimen, Takashi, and Nederman, Cary J.. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 1324.
Dien, Mawil Izzi. 2004. Islamic Law: From Historical Foundations to Contemporary Practice. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Esposito, John L. 2010. The Future of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fadel, Mohammad H. 2007. “Public Reason as a Strategy for Principled Reconciliation: The Case of Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law.” Chicago Journal of International Law 8:120.
Feldman, Noah. 2008. The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Godrej, Farah. 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, Todd H. 2010. “The Resistance to Minarets in Europe.” Journal of Church and State 52:619643.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 92:109131.
Hallaq, Wael B. 1984. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?International Journal of Middle East Studies 16:341.
Hallaq, Wael B. 2005. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hart, Henrik. 2000. “Religious Conflicts, Public Policy, and Moral Authority: Reflections on Christian Faith and Homosexual Rights in a Plural Society.” In Towards an Ethic of Community: Negotiations of Difference in a Pluralist Society, ed. Olthuis, James H.Waterloo: Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion, 91126.
Ingrim, David. 2004. Rights, Democracy, and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity Politics: Principled Compromises in a Compromised World. Lanhan, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Jakobs, Hans-Jürgen. 2009. “Minarett-Verbot: Wenn der Staat das Volk nicht mehr versteht (Minaret-ban: When the State Does Not Understand the People Anymore).” Süddeutsche Zeitung, November 30. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/minarett-verbot-wenn-der-staat-das-volk-nicht-mehr-versteht-1.133875 (Accessed on March 3, 2012).
Kamm, Oliver. 2009. “Swiss Minaret Ban Fits Pattern of Populist Protest in Western Europe.” The Times, November 30. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article2601430.ece (Accessed on March 3, 2012).
Koch, Bettina. 2005. Zur Dis-/Kontinuität mittelalterlichen politischen Denkens in der neuzeitlichen politischen Theorie: Marsilius von Padua, Johannes Althusius und Thomas Hobbes im Vergleich (On the Dis/Continuity of MedievalPolitical Thought in Early Modern Political Theory: Marsilius of Padua, Johannes Althusius, and Thomas Hobbes Compared). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Koch, Bettina. 2012a. “Priestly Despotism: The Problem of Unruly Clerics in Marsilius of Padua's Defensor Pacis.” Journal of Religious History 36:165183.
Koch, Bettina. 2012b. “Marsilius of Padua on Church and State.” In A Companion to Marsilius of Padua, eds. Moreno-Riaño, Gerson, and Nederman, Cary J.. Leiden: Brill, 139179.
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Langer, Lorenz. 2010. “Panacea or Pathetic Fallacy? The Swiss Ban on Minarets.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 43:863951.
Mahmoud, Mohamed A. 2000. “Mahmud Muhammad Taha's Second Message of Islam and his Modernist Project.” In Islam and Modernity: Muslim Intellectuals Respond, ed. Cooper, John. London: I. B. Tauris, 105128.
Mahmoud, Mohamed A. 2007. Quest for Divinity: A Critical Examination of the Thought of Mahmud Muhammad Taha. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Marsilius of Padua. 1933/4. Defensor Pacis, ed. Scholz, Richard. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
Marsilius of Padua. 1993. Defensor minor and De translatione imperii (The “Minor Defender” and “On the Translation of the Empire”), ed. and trans. Nederman, Cary J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mirza, Qudsia. 2000. “Islamic Feminism and the Exemplary Past.” In Feminist Perspectives on Law & Theory, eds. Richardson, Janice, and Sandland, Ralph. London: Cavendish, 187208.
Morrell, Michael E. 1999. “Citizens’ Evaluation of Participatory Democratic Procedure: Normative Theory Meets Empirical Science.” Political Research Quarterly 52:293322.
Nederman, Cary J. 2009. Lineages of European Political Thought: Explorations Along the Medieval/Modern Divide from John of Salisbury to Hegel. Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press.
Nederman, Cary J. 2002. “Mechanics and Citizens: The Reception of the Aristotelian Idea of Citizenship in Late Medieval Europe.” Vivarium 40:75102.
Nederman, Cary J. 2000. Worlds of Difference: European Discourses of Toleration, c. 1100–c.1550. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nederman, Cary J. 1992. “Character and Community in the Defensor Pacis: Marsiglio of Padua's Adaptation of Aristotelian Moral Psychology.” History of Political Thought 13:377390.
Offler, Hilary Seton. 1956. “Empire and Papacy: The Last Struggle.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 6:2147.
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2001. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sadiki, Larbi. 2004. The Search for Arab Democracy: Discourses and Counter-Discourses. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Smock, David R. 2004. Ijtihad: Reinterpreting Islamic Principles for the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace, 18.
Stüssi, Marcel. 2008. “Banning of Minarets: Addressing the Validity of a Controversial Swiss Popular Initiative.” Religion and Human Rights 3:135153.
Taha, Mahmoud Mohamed. 1987. The Second Message of Islam, trans. an-Na‘im, Abdullahi Ahmed. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Wehrli, Christoph. 2009. “Klares, aber vieldeutiges Nein zu Minaretten: Unterschätzte Identitätsprobleme in einer Gesellschaft des Wandels (A Clear but Ambivalent No to Minarets: Underestimated Problems of Identity in a Changing Society).” Neu Züricher Zeitung Online, November 29. http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/politik/schweiz/minarett_initiative_hochrechnung_annahme_1.4079737.html (Accessed on March 3, 2012).
Zapf, Holger. 2011. “Von der Heuristik zur Methode? Die Debatte um die ‘comparative political Theory’ und die Ansätze zu einer transkulturellen politischen Theorie (From Heuristic to Method: The “Comparative Political Theory” Debate and the Approaches to Transcultural Political Theory).” Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 2:322.
Rashid, Ahmed. 2008. Descent into Chaos: The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. London: Penguin.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed