Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:58:08.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case for Enforcement of the Surrogate Contract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

John Lawrence Hill
John Lawrence Hill*
Affiliation:
IIT Chicago Kent School of Law, 77 South Wacker Avenue, Chicago, IL 60606
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: The Politics of Surrogacy Contracts , February 1990 , pp. 147 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, L. (1987). “The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood.” Hastings Center Report 17(5):31–40.Google Scholar
Bluestein, J. (1982). Parents and Children: The Ethics of the Family. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bostwick, G. (1976). “A Taxonomy of Privacy: Repose, Sanctuary and Intimate Decision.” California Law Review 64:1447–83.Google Scholar
Brophy, K. (1981). “A Surrogate Motherhood Contract To Bear A Child.” Journal of Family Law 20:263–91.Google Scholar
Burt, R. A. (1988). “Barren Couples To Resort to Back Alleys?” New Jersey Law Journal 18 (Feb.):27.Google Scholar
Carey v. Population Services, 431 U.S. 678 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodorow, N. (1978). The Reproduction of Mothering. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Corea, G. (1985). The Mother Machine. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
D'Aversa, C. (1987). “The Right of Abortion in Surrogate Mother Arrangements.” Northern Illinois University Law Review 7(1):1–39.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Grobstein, C., Flower, M., and Mendeloff, J. (1983). “External Human Fertilization: An Evaluation of Policy.” Science 222(4620): 127–33.Google Scholar
Handel, W., and Sherwyn, B. A. (1982). “Surrogate Parenting.” Trial 18 (April): 57–60.Google Scholar
Hanley, R. (1988). “7-0 Ruling in Baby M Case.” New York Times Feb 4: A1.Google Scholar
Hollinger, J. H. (1985). “From Coitus to Commerce: Legal and Social Consequences of Noncoital Reproduction.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 18(4): 865–991.Google Scholar
In the Matter of Baby M, 537 A.2d 1227 (N.J. 1988).Google Scholar
Kass, L. (1979). “Making Babies Revisited.” Public Interest 54 (Winter): 32–60.Google Scholar
Keane, N., and Breo, D. (1981). The Surrogate Mother. New York: Everest House.Google Scholar
Krimmel, H. (1983). “The Case Against Surrogate Parenting.” Hastings Center Report 13 (October): 35–39.Google Scholar
Lehr v. Robertson, 460 U.S. 248 (1983).Google Scholar
McCormick, R. A. (1981). How Brave A New World? Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer V. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).Google Scholar
Michael H. v. Gerald D., 109 S.Ct. 2333 (1989).Google Scholar
O'Brien, S. (1984). “Commercial Conceptions: A Breeding Ground for Surrogacy.” North Carolina Law Review 65:127–53.Google Scholar
Overvold, A. Z. (1988). Surrogate Parenting. New York: Pharos Books.Google Scholar
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983). Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. (1970). Fabricated Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. A. (1983). “Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy and Childbirth.” Virginia Law Review 69(3): 405–90.Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Rothman, B. K. (1984). “The Meaning of Choice in Reproductive Technology.” In Arditi, R. (ed.), Test-tube Women. Boston: Pandora Press.Google Scholar
Schoeman, F. (1981). “Rights of Children, Rights of Parents and the Moral Basis of the Family.” Ethics 91(1):6–21.Google Scholar
Schulman, J., and Simpson, J. L. (1981). Genetic Diseases in Pregnancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, A., and Silverman, A. (1971). The Case Against Having Children. New York: David McKay Co.Google Scholar
Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).Google Scholar
Smith, S. H. (1979). “Psychological Parents v. Biological Parents: The Court's Response to New Directions in Child Custody Dispute Resolution.” Journal of Family Law 17:545–76.Google Scholar
Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972).Google Scholar
Tribe, L. (1987). American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1988). Infertility: Medical and Social Choices. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1987). Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Verney, T., and Kelly, J. (1981). The Secret Life of the Unborn Child.Google Scholar
Webster b. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S.Ct. 3040 (1989).Google Scholar
Wiehl, L. (1989). “DNA Tests.” Chicago Dailey Law Bulletin July 21:1.Google Scholar
Williams, E., McKillan, P., and Weathers, D. (1986). “Adoption vs. Abortion.” Newsweek April 28: 39.Google Scholar
Wilson, A., and Hitchings, B. (1985). “Adoption: It's Not Impossible.” Business Week July 8: 112.Google Scholar