Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:31:31.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demographic variation in how the social brain processes news messages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Irene Ingeborg van Driel ,
Maria Elizabeth Grabe ,
Ozen Bas  and
Mariska Kleemans
Irene Ingeborg van Driel*
Affiliation:
The Media School, Indiana University
Maria Elizabeth Grabe
Affiliation:
The Media School, Indiana University
Ozen Bas
Affiliation:
The Media School, Indiana University
Mariska Kleemans
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University
*
Correspondence: Irene Ingeborg van Driel, The Media School, Indiana University, 1229 East 7th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405. Email: ivandrie@indiana.edu
Get access

Abstract

A high capacity for visual perception distinguishes Homo sapiens from other primates. This human ability to detect social cues and retain visual records of social networks has been tested mostly with static facial images in laboratory settings. However, media consumption has become closely entangled with the way social life is navigated. Therefore, the study reported here tested demographic differences (gender and education) in visual information processing of social and nonsocial objects featured in audiovisual news content. Women recognized (accuracy) and recalled (salience) social images better than men. On the other hand, men were more skilled at recognizing, but not recalling, nonsocial images. Participants with lower educational levels recognized and recalled fewer images than individuals with higher educational levels. Interactions between demographic variables and time suggest that memory records for social images are more stable than those for nonsocial images. Memory may have survival-relevant importance, serving navigational functions that vary across environmental demands, resulting in differences across demographic groups.

Keywords

Gendereducationfacial recognitioncued recallsocial perceptionmedia
Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Spring 2016 , pp. 61 - 73
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunbar, Robin I.M., “The social brain hypothesis,” Evolutionary Anthropology, 1998, 9(10): 178–190.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Robert A., “Neocortex size and behavioural ecology in primates,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1996, 263(1367): 173–177.Google ScholarPubMed
“The total audience report: Q2 2015,” Nielsen, September 21, 2015, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2015/the-total-audience-report-q2-2015.html, accessed March 21, 2016.Google Scholar
De Vreese, Claes H., “News framing: Theory and typology,” Information Design Journal and Document Design, 2005, 13(1): 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, Elizabeth, Van Anders, Sari, and Mullin, Lucy, “A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test of an evolutionary hypothesis,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 2006, 27(6): 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehnman, Jenny and Herlitz, Agneta, “Women remember more faces than men do,” Acta Psychologica, 2007, 124(3): 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziano, Cecilie, “Forecast 2000: Widening knowledge gaps,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1997, 74(2): 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Americans spending more time following the news,” Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center September, 12, 2010, http://people-press.org/2010/09/12/americans-spending-more-time-following-the-news, accessed March 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Fox, Sarah, Blasi, Anna, Volein, Agnes, Everdell, Nick, Elwell, Claire E., and Johnson, Mark H., “Social perception in infancy: A near infrared spectroscopy study,” Child Development, 2009, 80(4): 986–999.Google ScholarPubMed
Grabe, Maria E., “News as reality-inducing, survival-relevant, and gender-specific stimuli,” in Applied Evolutionary Psychology, Craig Roberts, S., ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 361–377.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Pamela, “Hard wired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function,” Journal of Communication, 1996, 46(3): 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Charles R., “Functional analysis and mass communication,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1960, 24(4): 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker.Google Scholar
Gaziano.Google Scholar
Grabe, Maria E., Lang, Annie, Zhou, Shuhua, and Bolls, Paul, “Cognitive access to negatively arousing news: An experimental investigation of the knowledge gap,” Communication Research, 2000, 27(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Maria E., Yegiyan, Narine, and Kamhawi, Rasha, “Experimental evidence of the knowledge gap: Message arousal, motivation, and time delay,” Human Communication Research, 2008, 34(4): 550–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Yoori and Jeong, Se-Hoon, “Revising the knowledge gap hypothesis: a meta-analysis of thirty-five years of research,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 2009, 86(3): 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findahl, Olle and Hoijer, Brigitta, “Some characteristics of news memory and comprehension,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 1985, 29: 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, Barrie, Furnham, Adrian, and Gietson, Gillian, “Memory for the news as a function of the channel of communication,” Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 1984, 3(4): 265–271.Google Scholar
Vettehen, Paul G.J. Hendriks, Hietbrink, Niek, and Renckstorf, Karsten, “Differences between men and women in recalling TV news,” in Media Use as Social Action: A European Approach to Audience Studies, Renckstorf, Karsten, McQuail, Denis, and Jankowski, Nicholas, eds. (London: John Libbey, 1996), pp. 151–162.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. and Anderson, Mary, “The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge,” Journal of Politics, 2004, 66(2): 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Jason P., Macrae, C. Neil, and Banaji, Mahzarin R., “Encoding-specific effects of social cognition on the neural correlates of subsequent memory,” Journal of Neuroscience, 2004, 24(21): 4912–4917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deaux, Kay, “Sex and gender,” Annual Review of Psychology, 1985, 36: 49–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herlitz, Agneta and Lovén, Johanna, “Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review,” Visual Cognition, 2013, 21(9–10): 1306–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehnman and Herlitz.Google Scholar
Babchuk, Wayne A., Hames, Raymond B., and Thompson, Ross A., “Sex differences in the recognition of infant facial expressions of emotion: The primary caretaker hypothesis,” Ethology and Sociobiology, 1985, 6(2): 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark M. and de Haan, Michelle, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 3rd ed. (West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).Google Scholar
Johnson and de Haan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark H., Grossmann, Tobias, and Kadosh, Kathrin Cohen, “Mapping functional brain development: Building a social brain through interactive specialization,” Developmental Psychology, 2009, 45(1): 151–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd-Fox et al.Google Scholar
Farroni, Teresa, Johnson, Mark H., Menon, Enrica, Zulian, Luisa, Faraguna, Dino, and Csibra, Gergely, “Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(47): 17245–17250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascalis, Olivier, de Haan, Michelle, and Nelson, Charles A., “Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? ” Science, 2002, 296(5571): 1321–1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montague, Diana P. and Walker–Andrews, Arlene S., “Mothers, fathers, and infants: The role of person familiarity and parental involvement in infants’ perception of emotion expressions,” Child Development, 2002, 73(5): 1339–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, Erin B., “A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents,” Psychological Bulletin, 2000, 126(3): 424–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, James W., Heptonstall, Bonnie, and Hagen, Simen, “Perceptual expertise and the plasticity of other-race face recognition,” Visual Cognition, 2013, 21(9–10): 1183–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M., “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks,” Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure.Google Scholar
McClure.Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, Carolyn and Reid, M. Jamila, “Strengthening social and emotional competence in young children—The foundation for early school readiness and success: Incredible Years Classroom social skills and problem solving curriculum,” Infants and Young Children, 2004, 17(2): 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster-Stratton and Jamila Reid.Google Scholar
Parker, Jeffrey G. and Asher, Steven R., “Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? ” Psychological Bulletin, 1987, 102(3): 357–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson et al.Google Scholar
Gaziano.Google Scholar
Liu, Yung-I and Eveland, William P., “Education, need for cognition, and campaign interest as moderators of news effects on political knowledge: An analysis of the knowledge gap,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 2005, 82(4): 910–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golarai, Golijeh, Gharemani, Dara G., Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan, Reiss, Allan, Eberhardt, Jennifer L., Gabrieli, John D.E., and Grill-Spector, Kalanit, “Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory,” Nature Neuroscience, 2007, 10: 512–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherf, K. Suzanne, Behrmann, Marlene, Humphreys, Kate, and Luna, Beatriz, “Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories,” Developmental Science, 2007, 10(4): F15–F30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southgate, Victoria, Csibra, Gergely, Kaufman, Jordy, and Johnson, Mark H., “Distinct processing of objects and faces in the infant brain,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2008, 20(4): 741–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, Eleanor A., Frith, Christopher D., and Cipolotti, Lisa, “Distinct neural systems for the encoding and recognition of topography and faces,” Neuroimage, 2001, 13(4): 743–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, Robert L., “Parental investment and sexual selection,” in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Campbell, Bernard Grant, ed. (Chicago: Aldine, 1972), pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
Buss, David M., The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (Hoboken, NJ: 2005), John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Andreano, Joseph M. and Cahill, Larry, “Sex influences on the neurobiology of learning and Memory,” Learning and Memory, 2009, 16(4): 248–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, Diane F., Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, 3rd ed. (New York: Psychology Press, 2009), p. 440.Google Scholar
Halpern, Diane F. and Lamay, Mary L., “The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence,” Educational Psychology Review, 2000, 12(2): 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers-Levy, Joan, “Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity hypothesis,” in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, Cafferata, Patricia and Tybout, Alice M., eds. (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 219–260.Google Scholar
McGivern, Robert F., Huston, J. Patrick, Byrd, Desiree, King, Tina, Siegle, Greg J., and Reilly, Judy, “Sex differences in visual recognition memory: support for a sex-related difference in attention in adults and children,” Brain and Cognition, 1997, 34(3): 323–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, Frederic C., Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (London: Cambridge University Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Page, Michael and Norris, Dennis, “The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall,” Psychological Review, 1998, 105(4): 761–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Nelson, Nugent, Lara D., Emily, Elliott, and Geer, Tara, “Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998),” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 2000, 53(3): 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonides, John, Lewis, Richard L., Nee, Derek Evan, Lustig, Cindy A., Berman, Marc G., and Moore, Katherine S., “The mind and brain of short-term memory,” Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59: 193–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Duncan, Matthew, and Brown, Gordon, “Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2004, 11(5): 771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nairne, James S., “Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model,” Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53(1): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, Roger A., Simon, Elliott W., Nowak, Carol A., and Hultsch, David F., “Text recall in adulthood as a function of level of information, input modality, and delay interval,” Journal of Gerontology, 1982, 37(3): 358–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabe et al., 2008.Google Scholar
Meeter, Martijn, Murre, Jaap M.J., and Janssen, Steve M.J., “Remembering the news: Modeling retention data from a study with 14,000 participants,” Memory and Cognition, 2005, 33(5): 793–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr., Seo, Mihye, and Marton, Krisztina, “Learning from the news in campaign 2000: An experimental comparison of TV news, newspapers, and online news,” Media Psychology, 2002, 4(4): 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bas, Ozen and Grabe, Maria E., “Emotion-provoking personalization of news: Informing citizens and closing the knowledge gap?” Communication Research, published online before print, December 10, 2013; 2015, 42(2): 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeter et al.Google Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr., Marton, Krisztina, and Seo, Mihye, “Moving beyond ‘Just the Facts’: The influence of online news on the content and structure of public affairs knowledge,” Communication Research, 2004, 31(1): 82–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe et al., 2008.Google Scholar
Tremayne, Mark and Dunwoody, Sharon, “Interactivity, information processing, and learning on the World Wide Web,” Science Communication, 2001, 23(2): 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bas and Grabe.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A., Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide, 2nd ed. (New York: Longman, 1988).Google Scholar
Chew, Fiona and Palmer, Sushma, “Interest, the knowledge gap, and television programming,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 1994, 38(3): 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziano, Cecilie and O’Leary, Joann, “Childbirth and infant development knowledge gaps in interpersonal settings,” Journal of Health Communication, 1998, 3(1): 29–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Grabe, Maria E., Kamhawi, Rasha, and Yegiyan, Narine, “Informing citizens: How people with different levels of education process television, newspaper, and web news,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 2009, 53(1): 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bas and Grabe.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A., Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Maria E., Bas, Ozen, Pagano, Louis, and Samson, Lelia, “The architecture of female competition: Derogation of a sexualized female news anchor,” Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 2012, 10(3): 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Teresa and Martins, Nicole, “Nothing to fear? An analysis of college students’ fear experiences with video games,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 2015, 59(2): 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golarai et al.Google Scholar
Scherf et al.Google Scholar
Southgate et al.Google Scholar
Robert, Stephanie and House, James S., “SES differentials in health by age and alternative indicators of SES,” Journal of Aging and Health, 1996, 8(3): 359–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabe et al. 2000.Google Scholar
Wise, Kevin, Bolls, Paul D., and Schaefer, Samantha R., “Choosing and reading online news: How available choice affects cognitive processing,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 2008, 52(1): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhagen, John, “TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach avoidance and memory,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 1998, 42(2): 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhagen, John and Reeves, Byron, “The evening’s bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory,” Journal of Communication, 1992, 42(2): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar