Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:45:22.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare—A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Susan Wright  and
Richard Falk
Susan Wright
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, USA
Richard Falk
Affiliation:
Princeton University, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Biological Warfare
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 55 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bidwai, P. (1999). “Towards a New Paradigm: Comprehensive Security, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Biological Weapons.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R., (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Black, S. (1999). “UNSCOM and the Iraqi Biological Weapons Program: Implications for Arms Control.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R., (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Carter, A., Deutch, J., and Zelikow, P. (1998). “Combating Catastrophic Terrorism.” Foreign Affairs (November/December):80–94.Google Scholar
Chari, P.R. and Deshingkar, G. (1999). “Putting Teeth into the BWC: An Indian View.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R. (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Council for Responsible Genetics (1991). Proposal to Third Review Conference of the Biological Weapons Convention. September.Google Scholar
Dhar, B. and Chaturvedi, S. (1999). “The Patent Regime and Implementing Article X of the BTWC: Some Reflections.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R., (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, L. (1998). “Integrated Middle East Regional Approaches to Arms Control and Disarmament Relating to Biological and Other Forms of Unconventional Warfare.” Paper presented at UNIDIR Conference on Biological Warfare and Disarmament: Problems, Perspectives, Possible Solutions, July 5–8.Google Scholar
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (1998). “The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention.” Position statement circulated at the 12th session of the BWC Ad Hoc Group, September 14–October 9.Google Scholar
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (1998). “Global Industry Position on Biological Weapons Issue.” Joint statement circulated at the 12th session of the BWC Ad Hoc Group, September 14–October 9.Google Scholar
Falk, R. (1999). “Assessing the Challenges of Biological Weaponry in the Late 1990s.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R. (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federation of American Scientists (1991). Major Proposals for Action at the Third Review Conference of the Biological Weapons Convention. September.Google Scholar
Ismael, J. and Ismael, T. (1999). “Cowboy Warfare, Biological Diplomacy: Disarming Metaphors as Weapons of Mass Destruction.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R. (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Mashhadi, H. (1999). “Biological Warfare and Disarmament Problems, Perspectives, and Possible Solutions: Complementary Measures Inside and Outside the Framework of the BWC.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R., (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Muth, W. (1999). “The Role of the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries in Strengthening the Biological Disarmament Regime.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R., (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Nasseri, S. (1993). Statement, 659th Plenary Session, United Nations Conference on Disarmament, 10 August. UN Document CD/PV.659, pp. 2–9.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. (1992). Statement on Behalf of the Australia Group, 629th Plenary Session of the United Nations Conference on Disarmament. UN Document CD/1164, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. (1998). “The Threat of Deliberate Disease in the 21st Century.” In Chevrier, M. et al., (eds.), Biological Weapons Proliferation: Reasons for Concern, Courses for Action. Henry L. Stimson Center, Report No. 24. January.Google Scholar
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (1998). “Summary of PhRMA's Position on a Compliance Protocol to the Biological Weapons Convention.” Position statement circulated at the 12th session of the BWC Ad Hoc Group, September 14–October 9.Google Scholar
Pringle, P. (1998). “Bioterrorism: America's Newest War Game.” The Nation, November 9, 11–17.Google Scholar
Rauf, T. (1998). “Defining the Proliferation Problem.” Paper presented at Conference on Biological Warfare and Disarmament: Problems, Perspectives, Possible Solutions, UN Institute for Disarmament Research, Palais des Nations, Geneva, July 5–8.Google Scholar
Renner, M. (1998). “The Global Divide: Socioeconomic Disparities and International Security.” In Klare, M. and Chandran, Y., (eds.), World Security: Challenges for a New Century. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.P.P. (1995). “The Verification System for the Chemical Weapons Convention.” In Bardonnet, D., (ed.), The Convention on the Prohibition and Elimination of Chemical Weapons: A Breakthrough in Multilateral Disarmament. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Smithson, A. (1997). “Separating Fact from Fiction: The Australia Group and the Chemical Weapons Convention.” The Henry L. Stimson Center, Occasional Paper No. 34. March.Google Scholar
Smithson, A. (1998). “Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention at 1 1/2.” The Henry L. Stimson Center, Report No. 25. September.Google Scholar
Smithson, A. (1999). “Tall Order: Crafting a Meaningful Verification Protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention.” In Wright, S. and Falk, R. (eds.), Symposium on Responding to the Challenge of Biological Warfare–A Matter of Contending Paradigms of Thought and Action, Politics and the Life Sciences 18: this issue.Google Scholar
Sprinzak, E. (1998). “The Great Superterrorism Scare.” Foreign Policy (Fall): 110–22.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1991). “Foundations of a New International Political Economy: An Eclectic Approach.” In Murphy, C. and Tooze, R., eds., The New International Political Economy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
United Nations (1991). Final Declaration. In Final Document, Third Review Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction. UN Document BWC/CONF. HI/23. Pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
United Nations (1994). Final Report, Special Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. UN Document BWC/SPCONF/1. 19–30 September. Pp. 9–11.Google Scholar
United Nations (1998). Procedural Report of the Ad Hoc Group of States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, Annex I: Rolling Text of a Protocol to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. UN Document BWC/Ad Hoc Group/43.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1992). “Prospects for Biological Disarmament.” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 2(2).Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1997). “Bioweapons: Cuba Case Tests Treaty.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (November/December): 18–19.Google Scholar
Wright, S. and Wallace, D. (1998). “Varieties of Secrets and Secret Varieties: Secrecy and the Biotechnology Industry.” Paper presented at UNIDIR Conference on Biological Warfare and Disarmament: Problems, Perspectives, Possible Solutions, July 5–8.Google Scholar
Zanders, J.P. and French, E. (1999). “Article XI of the Chemical Weapons Convention: Between Irrelevance and Indispensability.” Contemporary Security Policy, 20(1). April.Google Scholar