Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates

  • Patrick A. Stewart (a1), Austin D. Eubanks (a2) and Jason Miller (a3)

Abstract

In an on-demand media environment, the 2016 presidential primary debates provided a ratings and economic boost to host networks surpassing all prior primary debates and even major sporting events in viewership. In turn, millions of viewers were exposed to and subtly influenced by the ways in which these candidates were visually presented. We analyze how the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates were presented in their initial two debates (Fox News and CNN; CNN and CBS, respectively). Candidates are considered in terms of visual priming through aggregate camera time and average camera fixation time and how contenders were visually framed through the proportion of different camera shot types used (solo, split screen, side by side, multiple candidate, and audience reaction). Findings suggest that while the front-runners from both political parties benefited from preferential visual coverage, Donald Trump stood out in terms of the visual priming and framing that presented him as a serious contender.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Patrick A. Stewart, Department of Political Science 428 Old Main, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701. Email: pastewar@uark.edu

References

Hide All
1 Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A. D., and Miller, J., “‘Please clap’: Applause, laughter, and booing during the 2016 GOP presidential primary debates,” PS: Political Science & Politics , 2016, 49(4): 696700.
2 Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., and Lau, R. R., “Affective intelligence and voting information processing and learning in a campaign,” in The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., Mackuen, M., and Crigler, A. N., eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), pp. 152179.
3 Dowdle, A., Limbocker, S., Yang, S., Sebold, K., and Stewart, P. A., The Invisible Hands of Political Parties in Presidential Elections: Party Activists and Political Aggregation from 2004 to 2012 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
4 Adkins, R. E. and Dowdle, A. J., “Continuity and change in the presidential money primary,” American Review of Politics , 2008, 28: 319341.
5 Steger, W. P., Dowdle, A. J., and Adkins, R. E., “The New Hampshire effect in presidential nominations,” Political Research Quarterly , 2004, 57(3): 375390.
6 Azari, J. R., “How the news media helped to nominate trump,” Political Communication , 2016, 33(4): 677680.
7 Lawrence, R. G. and Boydstun, A. E., “What we should really be asking about media attention to trump,” Political Communication , 2016, 34(1): 150153.
8 Krasner, M. A., “‘Reality’ versus ‘reality TV’ in the Trump campaign and presidency,” paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting (Chicago, IL, 2016).
9 Patterson, T. E., “Pre-primary news coverage of the 2016 presidential race: Trump’s rise, Sanders’ emergence, Clinton’s struggle,” Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy, Harvard University, June 13, 2016, https://shorensteincenter.org/pre-primary-news-coverage-2016-trump-clinton-sanders/, accessed August 2, 2018.
10 Moy, P., Tewksbury, D., and Rinke, E. M., “Agenda setting, priming, and framing,” in The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, Jensen, K. B. and Craig, R. T., eds. (Malden, MA: Wiley, 2016), pp. 5264.
11 Iyengar, S. and Kinder, D. R., News That Matters: Agenda-Setting and Priming in a Television Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
12 Iyengar, S. and McGrady, J., Media Politics: A Citizen’s Guide (New York: W. W. Norton, 2007).
13 Scheufele, D. A., “Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication,” Mass Communication & Society , 2000, 3(2–3): 297316.
14 Messaris, P., “Visual aspects of media literacy,” Journal of Communication , 1998, 48(1): 7080.
15 Messaris, P. and Abraham, L., “The role of images in framing news stories,” in Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H. Jr., and Grant, A. E., eds. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001), pp. 215226.
16 Stewart, P. A., “Polls and elections: Do the presidential primary debates matter? Measuring candidate speaking time and audience response during the 2012 primaries,” Presidential Studies Quarterly , 2015, 45(2): 361381.
17 Gong, Z. H. and Bucy, E. P., “Image bite analysis of presidential debates,” in Exploring the C-SPAN Archives: Advancing the Research Agenda, Browning, R. X., ed. (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2015), pp. 4575.
18 Stewart, P. A., Debatable Humor: Laughing Matters on the 2008 Presidential Primary Campaign (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2012).
19 Fein, S., Goethals, G. R., and Kugler, M. B., “Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates,” Political Psychology , 2007, 28(2): 165192.
20 Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A. D., Dye, R. G., Eidelman, S., and Wicks, R. H., “Visual presentation style 2: Influences on perceptions of donald trump and hillary clinton based on visual presentation style during the third 2016 presidential debate,” American Behavioral Scientist , 2017, 61(5): 545557.
21 Wicks, R. H., Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A. D., Eidelman, S., and Dye, R. G., “Visual presentation style 1: A test of visual presentation styles and candidate evaluation during the first 2016 presidential debate,” American Behavioral Scientist , 2017, 61(5): 533544.
22 Wicks, R. H., “Does presentation style of presidential debates influence young voters’ perceptions of candidates?,” American Behavioral Scientist , 2007, 50(9): 12471254.
23 Barnhurst, K. G. and Steele, C. A., “Image-bite news: The visual coverage of elections on US television, 1968–1992,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics , 1997, 2(1): 4058.
24 Bucy, E. P. and Newhagen, J. E., “The micro- and macrodrama of politics on television: Effects of media format on candidate evaluations,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 1999, 43(2): 193210.
25 Esser, F., “Dimensions of political news cultures: Sound bite and image bite news in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States,” International Journal of Press/Politics , 2008, 13(4): 401428.
26 Grabe, M. E., “The South African Broadcasting Corporation’s coverage of the 1987 and 1989 elections: The matter of visual bias,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 1996, 40(2): 153179.
27 Haumer, F. and Donsbach, W., “The rivalry of nonverbal cues on the perception of politicians by television viewers,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 2009, 53(2): 262279.
28 Bucy, E. P., “Nonverbal communication, emotion, and political evaluation,” in The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media, Doveling, K., von Scheve, C., and Konijn, E. A., eds. (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2011), pp. 195220.
29 Grabe, M. E. and Bucy, E. P., Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).
30 Bucy, E. P., “Media Biopolitics: The Emergence of a Subfield,” in Handbook of Biology and Politics, Peterson, S. A. and Somit, A., eds. (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 284303.
31 Masters, R. D., “The impact of ethology on political science,” in Biology and Politics: Recent Explorations, Somit, A., ed. (The Hague: Mouton, 1976), pp. 197233.
32 Sullivan, D. G. and Masters, R. D., “Biopolitics, the media, and leadership: Nonverbal cues, emotions, and trait attributions in the evaluation of leaders,” in Research in Biopolitics: Biopolitics in the Mainstream, Somit, A. and Peterson, S. A., eds. (Somerville, MA: Emerald Group Publishing, 1994), pp. 237273.
33 Sullivan, D. G. and Masters, R. D., “‘Happy warriors’: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support,” American Journal of Political Science , 1988, 32(2): 345368.
34 Mutz, D. C., In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).
35 Chance, M. R. A., “Attention structure as the basis of primate rank orders,” Man , 1967, 2(4): 503518.
36 Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., Human Ethology (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1989).
37 Mazur, A., Biosociology of Dominance and Deference (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005).
38 Salter, F. K., Emotions in Command: Biology, Bureaucracy, and Cultural Evolution (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2007).
39 Kwan, L. Y., Yap, S., and Chiu, C., “Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2015, 129: 4858.
40 Verrier, D., “Evidence for the influence of the mere-exposure effect on voting in the eurovision song contest,” Judgment and Decision Making , 2012, 7(5): 639643.
41 Mutz, D. C., “Effects of ‘in-your-face’ television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition,” American Political Science Review , 2007, 101(4): 621635.
42 Mutz, D. C. and Reeves, Byron, “The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust,” American Political Science Review , 2005, 99(1): 115.
43 Masters, R. D., The Nature of Politics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989).
44 Cho, J., Shah, D. V., Nah, S., and Brossard, D., “‘Split screens’ and ‘spin rooms’: Debate modality, post-debate coverage, and the new videomalaise,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 2009, 53(2): 242261.
45 Scheufele, D. A., Kim, E., and Brossard, D., “My friend’s enemy: How split-screen debate coverage influences evaluation of presidential debates,” Communication Research , 2007, 34(1): 324.
46 Murray, G. R. and Murray, S. M., “Caveman executive leadership: Evolved leadership preferences and biological sex,” in Evolutionary Psychology in the Business Sciences, Saad, G., ed. (Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), pp. 135163.
47 Murray, G. R. and Schmitz, J. D., “Caveman politics: Evolutionary leadership preferences and physical stature,” Social Science Quarterly , 2011, 92(5): 12151235.
48 Gong, Z. H. and Bucy, E. P., “When style obscures substance: Visual attention to display appropriateness in the 2012 presidential debates,” Communication Monographs , 2016, 83(3): 349372.
49 Stewart, P. A. and Mosely, J., “Politicians under the microscope: Eye blink rates during the first bush-kerry debate,” White House Studies , 2009, 9(4): 373388.
50 Schroeder, A., Presidential Debates: 40 Years of High Risk TV, 3rd ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016).
51Racine Group, “White paper on televised political campaign debates,” Argumentation and Advocacy, 2002, 38: 199–218.
52 Benoit, W. L., Political Election Debates: Informing Voters about Policy and Character (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013).
53 Jamieson, K. H. and Waldman, P., The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists, and the Stories that Shape the Political World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
54 Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., and Angleitner, and A., “Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2004, 86(4): 599614.
55 Spoor, J. R. and Kelly, J. R., “The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 2004, 7(4): 398412.
56 Damore, D. F., “A dynamic model of candidate fundraising: The case of presidential nomination campaigns,” Political Research Quarterly , 1997, 50(2): 343364.
57 Prior, M., “Visual political knowledge: A different road to competence?,” Journal of Politics , 2014, 76(1): 4157.
58 Donovan, T. and Hunsaker, R., “Beyond expectations: Effects of early elections in US presidential nomination contests,” PS: Political Science & Politics , 2009, 42(1): 4552.
59 Patterson, M. L., Churchill, M. E., Burger, G. K., and Powell, and J. L., “Verbal and nonverbal modality effects on impressions of political candidates: Analysis from the 1984 presidential debates,” Communication Monographs , 1992, 59(3): 231242.
60 Shah, D. V., Hanna, A., Bucy, E. P., Wells, C., and Quevedo, V., “The power of television images in a social media age: Linking biobehavioral and computational approaches via the second screen,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 2015, 659(1): 225307.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and the Life Sciences
  • ISSN: 0730-9384
  • EISSN: 1471-5457
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed