Skip to main content
×
Home

Listening to ‘difficult albums’: specialist music fans and the popular avant-garde

  • Chris Atton (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Difficulty is most often associated, not with popular music, but with the avant-garde. How do popular music listeners listen to albums that present compositional, performance or conceptual elements from the avant-garde? This paper explores where difficulty lies for listeners when they listen to, situate and evaluate albums that sit on the intersection between the popular and the avant-garde. The paper focuses on the online collaborative discourse of readers of a British music magazine (The Word), to explore how, while ‘difficult albums’ might be considered sui generis and dislocated from the norms of popular music, the aesthetic discourse of The Word's readers shows that to engage with difficult albums is to explore how they are able to be connected with a range of musical histories and practices, as well as to multiple personal experiences of popular music.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Adorno T.W. 1938/1991. ‘On the fetish-character in music and the regression of listening’, in The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, ed. Bernstein J.M. (London, Routledge), pp. 2652
Bailey D. 1980. Improvisation: Its Nature and Practice in Music (Ashbourne, Moorland)
Barnes M. 2000. Captain Beefheart (London, Quartet)
Brassier R. 2009. ‘Genre is obsolete’, in Noise and Capitalism, ed. Mattin and Iles A. (Donostia-San Sebastián, Arteleku Audiolab), pp. 6171
Bull M. 2007. Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience (London, Routledge)
Clarke E.F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
Couldry N. 1995. Turning the Musical Table: Improvisation in Britain 1965–1990, Special Issue of Rubberneck magazine, 19 (Basingstoke, Rubberneck)
Demers J. 2010. Listening Through the Noise: The Aesthetics of Experimental Electronic Music (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
DeNora T. 2000. Music in Everyday Life (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
Eisenberg E. 1988. The Recording Angel: Music, Records and Culture from Aristotle to Zappa (London, Pan)
Fabbri F. 1981. ‘A theory of musical genres: two applications’, in Popular Music Perspectives, ed. Horn D. and Tagg P. (Goteborg and Exeter, International Association for the Study of Popular Music), pp. 5181
Foster H. 1996. The Return of the Real: The Avant-garde at the End of the Century (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)
Frith S. 1996. Performing Rites: Evaluating Popular Music (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
Gendron B. 2002. Between Montmartre and the Mudd Club: Popular Music and the Avant-garde (Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press)
Gracyk T. 2007. Listening to Popular Music: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Led Zeppelin (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press)
Hatten R.S. 1994. Musical Meaning in Beethoven: Markedness, Correlation, and Interpretation (Bloomington, Indiana University Press)
Hesmondhalgh D. 2007. ‘Audiences and everyday aesthetics: talking about good and bad music’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, pp. 507–27
Jauss H.R. 1982. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Bahti T. (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press)
Lynskey D. 2010. ‘The agony and the ecstasy’, The Word, November, pp. 72–4
MacDonald I. 2008. Revolution in the Head: The Beatles' Records and the Sixties, 2nd rev. edn (London, Vintage)
Mann P. 1991. The Theory-death of the Avant-garde (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press)
Marcus G. 2000. Mystery Train: Images of American Rock ‘n’ Roll Music (London, Faber and Faber)
McClary S. 1989. ‘Terminal prestige: the case of avant-garde music composition’, Cultural Critique, 12, pp. 5781
Molon D. 2007. Sympathy for the Devil: Art and Rock and Roll since 1967 (Chicago, Museum of Contemporary Art)
Moore A.F. 2001. Rock: The Primary Text – Developing a Musicology of Rock, 2nd edn (Aldershot, Ashgate)
Novak D. 2008. ‘2.5 × 6 metres of space: Japanese music coffeehouses and experimental practices of listening’, Popular Music, 27, pp. 1534
Paddison M. 1993. Adorno's Aesthetics of Music (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
Plourde L. 2008. ‘Disciplined listening in Tokyo: onkyo and non-intentional sound’, Ethnomusicology, 52, pp. 270–95
Schafer R.M. 1977. The Tuning of the World (New York, Knopf)
Székely M.D. 2008. ‘Progressive listening, or listening as improvisation: the case of the Shaggs’, Canadian Aesthetics Journal, 15. http://www.uqtr.ca/AE/ (accessed 28 April 2011)
The Word. 2011. ‘Reader profile’. http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/advertisers/reader (accessed 9 May 2011)
Toynbee J. 2000. Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institutions (London, Arnold)
Walser R. 2003. ‘Popular music analysis: ten apothegms and four instances’, in Analyzing Popular Music, ed. Moore A.F. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 1638
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Popular Music
  • ISSN: 0261-1430
  • EISSN: 1474-0095
  • URL: /core/journals/popular-music
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 90 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 263 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.