Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Assessment of Groin Application of Junctional Tourniquets in a Manikin Model

  • John F. Kragh (a1), Matthew P. Lunati (a2), Chetan U. Kharod (a3), Cord W. Cunningham (a3), Jeffrey A. Bailey (a1), Zsolt T. Stockinger (a1), Andrew P. Cap (a1), Jacob Chen (a1), James K. Aden (a1) and Leopoldo C. Cancio (a1)...
Abstract
Introduction

To aid in preparation of military medic trainers for a possible new curriculum in teaching junctional tourniquet use, the investigators studied the time to control hemorrhage and blood volume lost in order to provide evidence for ease of use.

Hypothesis

Models of junctional tourniquet could perform differentially by blood loss, time to hemostasis, and user preference.

Methods

In a laboratory experiment, 30 users controlled simulated hemorrhage from a manikin (Combat Ready Clamp [CRoC] Trainer) with three iterations each of three junctional tourniquets. There were 270 tests which included hemorrhage control (yes/no), time to hemostasis, and blood volume lost. Users also subjectively ranked tourniquet performance. Models included CRoC, Junctional Emergency Treatment Tool (JETT), and SAM Junctional Tourniquet (SJT). Time to hemostasis and total blood loss were log-transformed and analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the users represented as random effects and the tourniquet model used as the treatment effect. Preference scores were analyzed with ANOVA, and Tukey’s honest significant difference test was used for all post-hoc pairwise comparisons.

Results

All tourniquet uses were 100% effective for hemorrhage control. For blood loss, CRoC and SJT performed best with least blood loss and were significantly better than JETT; in pairwise comparison, CRoC-JETT (P < .0001) and SJT-JETT (P = .0085) were statistically significant in their mean difference, while CRoC-SJT (P = .35) was not. For time to hemostasis in pairwise comparison, the CRoC had a significantly shorter time compared to JETT and SJT (P < .0001, both comparisons); SJT-JETT was also significant (P = .0087). In responding to the directive, “Rank the performance of the models from best to worst,” users did not prefer junctional tourniquet models differently (P > .5, all models).

Conclusion

The CRoC and SJT performed best in having least blood loss, CRoC performed best in having least time to hemostasis, and users did not differ in preference of model. Models of junctional tourniquet performed differentially by blood loss and time to hemostasis.

Kragh JF Jr , Lunati MP , Kharod CU , Cunningham CW , Bailey JA , Stockinger ZT , Cap AP , Chen J , Aden JK 3d , Cancio LC . Assessment of Groin Application of Junctional Tourniquets in a Manikin Model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(4):358363.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: John F. Kragh, Jr, MD US Army Institute of Surgical Research 3698 Chambers Pass Bldg. 3611 Rm 222-4 JBSA Fort Sam Houston Texas 78234-7767 USA E-mail: John.f.kragh.civ@mail.mil
References
Hide All
1. Bowden, M. Black Hawk Down: A Story of Modern War. New York USA: Grove Press; 1999.
2. Blackbourne, LH, Mabry, R, Sebesta, J, Holcomb, JB. Joseph Lister, non-compressible arterial hemorrhage, and the next generation of “tourniquets?” US Army Med Dep J. 2008;Jan-Mar: 56-59.
3. Andersen, RC, Shawen, SB, Kragh, JF Jr., et al. Special topics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(Suppl 1):S94-S98.
4. Eastridge, BJ, Hardin, M, Cantrell, J, et al. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care. J Trauma. 2011;7(1):S4-S8.
5. Kragh, JF Jr., Dubick, MA, Aden, JK 3rd, et al. US Military experience with junctional wounds in war from 2001 to 2010. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13(4):76-84.
6. Eastridge, BJ, Mabry, RL, Seguin, P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431-S437.
7. Anonymous. Abdominal aortic tourniquet? Use in Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13(2):1-2.
8. Tovmassian, RV, Kragh, JF Jr., Dubick, MA, Baer, DG, Blackbourne, LH. Combat ready clamp medic technique. J Spec Oper Med. 2012;12(4):72-78.
9. Taylor, DM, Coleman, M, Parker, PJ. The evaluation of an abdominal aortic tourniquet for the control of pelvic and lower limb hemorrhage. Mil Med. 2013;178(11):1196-1201.
10. Croushorn, J, Thomas, G, McCord, SR. Abdominal aortic tourniquet controls junctional hemorrhage from a gunshot wound of the axilla. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13(3):1-4.
11. Kragh, JF Jr., Murphy, C, Steinbaugh, J, et al. Prehospital emergency inguinal clamp controls hemorrhage in cadaver model. Mil Med. 2013;178(7):799-805.
12. Kragh, JF Jr., Mann-Salinas, EA, Kotwal, RS, et al. Laboratory assessment of out-of-hospital interventions to control junctional bleeding from the groin in a manikin model. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(8):1276-1278.
13. Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Guideline 140602. https://www.naemt.org/education/TCCC/guidelines_curriculum. Accessed April 6, 2015.
14. Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Supplementary Modules (CRoC Module, JETT Module, SJT Module). https://www.naemt.org/education/TCCC/guidelines_curriculum. Accessed April 6, 2015.
15. Kotwal, RS, Butler, FK, Gross, KR, et al. Management of junctional hemorrhage in tactical combat casualty care: TCCC guidelines proposed change 13-03. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13(4):85-93.
16. Klotz, JK, Leo, M, Anderson, BL, et al. First case report of SAM? Junctional tourniquet use in Afghanistan to control inguinal hemorrhage on the battlefield. J Spec Oper Med. 2014;14(2):1-5.
17. Ruterbusch, VL, Swiergosz, MJ, Montgomery, LD, Hopper, KW, Gerth, WA. ONR/MARCORSYSCOM. Evaluation of Self-Applied Tourniquets for Combat Applications. 2005.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed