Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Broselow and Handtevy Resuscitation Tapes: A Comparison of the Performance of Pediatric Weight Prediction

  • Calvin G. Lowe (a1) (a2), Rashida T. Campwala (a1), Nurit Ziv (a1) and Vincent J. Wang (a1) (a2)
Abstract
Abstract Objectives

To assess the performance of two pediatric length-based tapes (Broselow and Handtevy) in predicting actual weights of US children.

Methods

In this descriptive study, weights and lengths of children (newborn through 13 years of age) were extracted from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Using the measured length ranges for each tape and the NHANES-extracted length data, every case from the study sample was coded into Broselow and Handtevy zones. Mean weights were calculated for each zone and compared to the predicted Broselow and Handtevy weights using measures of bias, precision, and accuracy. A sub-sample was examined that excluded cases with body mass index (BMI)≥95th percentile. Weights of children longer than each tape also were examined.

Results

A total of 3,018 cases from the NHANES database met criteria. Although both tapes underestimated children’s weight, the Broselow tape outperformed the Handtevy tape across most length ranges in measures of bias, precision, and accuracy of predicted weights relative to actual weights. Accuracy was higher in the Broselow tape for shorter children and in the Handtevy tape for taller children. Among the sub-sample with cases of BMI≥95th percentile removed, performance of the Handtevy tape improved, yet the Broselow tape still performed better. When assessing the weights of children who were longer than either tape, the actual mean weights did not approximate adult weights; although, those exceeding the Handtevy tape were closer.

Conclusions

For pediatric weight estimation, the Broselow tape performed better overall than the Handtevy tape and more closely approximated actual weight.

Lowe CG , Campwala RT , Ziv N , Wang VJ . The Broselow and Handtevy Resuscitation Tapes: A Comparison of the Performance of Pediatric Weight Prediction. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(4):364375.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Calvin G. Lowe, MD Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine Children’s Hospital Los Angeles 4650 Sunset Blvd., Mailstop #113 Los Angeles, California 90027 USA E-mail: clowe@chla.usc.edu
References
Hide All
1. Emergency Medical Services Authority and California Health and Human Services Agency. Guidelines for Prehospital Pediatric Protocol. State of California; 2011.
2. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the USHS. The future of emergency care in the United States health system. Ann Emer Med. 2006;48(2):115-120.
3. Abdel-Rahman SM, Ridge A, Kearns GL. Estimation of body weight in children in the absence of scales: a necessary measurement to insure accurate drug dosing. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(6):570-574.
4. Kleinman ME, de Caen AR, Chameides L, et al. Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Pediatrics. 2010;126(5):e1261-e1318.
5. Lubitz DS, Seidel JS, Chameides L, Luten RC, Zaritsky AL, Campbell FW. A rapid method for estimating weight and resuscitation drug dosages from length in the pediatric age group. Ann Emer Med. 1988;17(6):576-581.
6. Rosenberg M, Greenberger S, Rawal A, Latimer-Pierson J, Thundiyil J. Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(5):482-488.
7. Krieser D, Nguyen K, Kerr D, Jolley D, Clooney M, Kelly AM. Parental weight estimation of their child’s weight is more accurate than other weight estimation methods for determining children’s weight in an emergency department? Emerg Med J. 2007;24(11):756-759.
8. So TY, Farrington E, Absher RK. Evaluation of the accuracy of different methods used to estimate weights in the pediatric population. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):e1045-e1051.
9. Wells M, Coovadia A, Kramer E, Goldstein L. The PAWPER tape: a new concept tape-based device that increases the accuracy of weight estimation in children through the inclusion of a modifier based on body habitus. Resuscitation. 2013;84(2):227-232.
10. Armstrong Medical Industries. Broselow Pediatric Emergency Tape; 2011. https://www.armstrongmedical.com/index.cfm/go/product.detail/sec/3/ssec/14/fam/2371. Accessed May 2, 2013.
11. Cattermole GN, Leung PY, Graham CA, Rainer TH. Too tall for the tape: the weight of schoolchildren who do not fit the Broselow tape. Emerg Med J. 2013; [epub ahead of print].
12. Antevy P. First-hand approach. A novel method to rapidly calculate pediatric drug dosages. JEMS. 2013;38(8):32-35.
13. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010. http://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/search/nhanes09_10.aspx. Accessed May 5, 2013.
14. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Anthropometry Procedures Manual 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_09_10/BodyMeasures_09.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2013.
15. Pediatric Emergency Standards; Handtevy PreHospital 2014. www.handtevy.com. Accessed May 31, 2013.
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growth Charts, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts. Accessed May 31, 2013.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Basics About Childhood Obesity 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/basics.html. Accessed May 2, 2013.
18. Annis C. Statistical Engineering: Precision Bias. http://www.statisticalengineering.com/ Weibull/precision-bias.html. Accessed March 15, 2013.
19. Ackwerh R, Lehrian L, Nafiu OO. Assessing the accuracy of common pediatric age-based weight estimation formulae. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(5):1027-1033.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.
21. Abdel-Rahman SM, Paul IM, James LP, Lewandowski A, Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act-Pediatric Trials N. Evaluation of the Mercy TAPE: performance against the standard for pediatric weight estimation. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(4):332-339; e336.
22. Hanneman SK. Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies. AACN. 2008;19(2):223-234.
23. Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, Thisted R, Foss J. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(3):593-602.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Child Obesity Facts: Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/obesity/facts.htm. Accessed June 13, 2013.
25. Sandell JM, Charman SC. Can age-based estimates of weight be safely used when resuscitating children? Emerg Med J. 2009;26(1):43-47.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Lowe supplementary material
Figure

 Unknown (487 KB)
487 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 64 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 564 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.