Skip to main content

Clinical Information Transfer between EMS Staff and Emergency Medicine Assistants during Handover of Trauma Patients

  • Seyedeh Almas Fahim Yegane (a1), Ali Shahrami (a1), Hamid Reza Hatamabadi (a1) and Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud (a2)
Abstract Introduction

Clinical handover by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff, as the first people who have contact with trauma patients, in the emergency department (ED), is very important. Therefore, effective communication to transfer clinical information about patients in a concise, rational, clear, and time-bound manner is essential. In Iran, the transfer of necessary information in clinical handover in EDs was carried out orally and without following standard instructions. This study aimed to audit the current clinical handover according to the Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (ISBAR) tool and survey the effect of training the ISBAR tool to Emergency Medicine Assistants (EMAs) and EMS staff on improvement of the clinical handover of patients to the ED.


This is a clinical audit study in three phases in Imam Hossein Hospital (Tehran, Iran) during 2016. In the first phase, the clinical handover between EMS staff and EMAs for 178 trauma patients admitted to the ED using ISBAR was audited and information was recorded. In the second phase, the correct approach of clinical handover according to the ISBAR tool was taught to EMS staff and EMAs using pamphlets and lectures. In the third phase, again, the clinical handover between EMS staff and EMAs for 168 trauma patients admitted to the ED was audited using the ISBAR tool and information was recorded. At the end, clinical audit assessment indicators of handover were evaluated before and after training.


Clinical audit of the current situation in the ED showed that the clinical handover process does not follow standard ISBAR (0.0%). However, after training, 65.3% of clinical handover processes were performed in accordance with ISBAR. In the current study, there was an increase in all parameters of the ISBAR tool after training, most of which increased significantly compared to the first phase of the study (before the intervention).


Findings demonstrate that patient handover in the ED did not initially follow the ISBAR standard guideline. After providing education as pamphlets and lectures to EMS staff and EMAs, a high percentage of patient handovers were conducted in accordance with the ISBAR instructions.

Fahim Yegane SA , Shahrami A , Hatamabadi HR , Hosseini-Zijoud SM . Clinical Information Transfer between EMS Staff and Emergency Medicine Assistants during Handover of Trauma Patients. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(5):541547.

Corresponding author
Correspondence: Ali Shahrami, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Imam Hossein Hospital, Madani Street Tehran, Iran 1617763141 E-mail:
Hide All

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Hide All
1. Bost N, Crilly J, Wallis M, Patterson E, Chaboyer W. Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency department - a literature review. Int Emerg Nurs. 2010;18(4):210-220.
2. Dojmi Di Delupis F, Mancini N, Di Nota T, Pisanelli P. Prehospital/emergency department handover in Italy. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(1):63-72.
3. Lally S. An investigation in to the functions of nurses’ communication at the inter-shift handover. J Nurs Manag. 1999;7(1):29.
4. Benson E, Rippin-Sisler C, Jabusch K, Keast S. Improving nursing shift‐to‐shift report. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22(1):80-84.
5. Strople B, Ottani P. Can technology improve intershift report? What the research reveals. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(3):197-204.
6. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, et al. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):257-266.
7. Singer JI, Dean J. Emergency physician intershift handovers: an analysis of our transitional care. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(10):751-754.
8. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krunholz HM, et al. Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1755-1760.
9. Welsh CA, Flanagan ME, Ebright P. Barriers and facilitators to nursing handoffs: recommendations for redesign. Nursing Outlook. 2010;58(3):148-154.
10. Hohenhaus S, Powell S, Hohenhaus JT. Enhancing patient safety during hand‐offs: standardized communication and teamwork using the ‘SBAR’method. AJN. 2006;106(8):72A-72BA.
11. Woodhall LJ, Vertacnik L, McLaughlin M. Implementation of the SBAR communication technique in a tertiary center. J Emergy Nurs. 2008;34(4):314-317.
12. Thompson JE, Collett LW, Langbart MJ, et al. Using the ISBAR handover tool in junior medical officer handover: a study in an Australian tertiary hospital. Postgrad Med J. 2011;87(1027):340-344.
13. Ahmed J, Mehmood S, Rehman S, Ilyas C, Khan L. Impact of a structured template and staff training on compliance and quality of clinical handover. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):571-574.
14. Arora V, Johnson J. A model for building a standardized hand-off protocol. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2006;32(11):646-655.
15. Yee KC, Wong MC, Turner P. Hand me an ISOBAR: a pilot study of an evidence-based approach to improving shift-to-shift clinical handover. Med J Aust. 2009;190(11 Suppl):S121-S124.
16. Marshall S, Harrison J, Flanagan B. The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of inter-professional clinical communication. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(2):137-140.
17. Ferran NA, Metcalfe AJ, O’Doherty D. Standardized proformas improve patient handover: audit of trauma handover practice. Patient Saf Surg. 2008;2(1):1.
18. Riesenberg LA, Leisch J, Cunningham JM. Nursing handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. AJN. 2010;110(4):24-34.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 381 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th June 2017 - 22nd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.