Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Mass-gathering Health Research Foundational Theory: Part 1 - Population Models for Mass Gatherings

  • Adam Lund (a1) (a2), Sheila A. Turris (a2) (a3) (a4), Ron Bowles (a2), Malinda Steenkamp (a5), Alison Hutton (a5), Jamie Ranse (a6) and Paul Arbon (a5)...
Abstract
Background

The science underpinning the study of mass-gathering health (MGH) is developing rapidly. Current knowledge fails to adequately inform the understanding of the science of mass gatherings (MGs) because of the lack of theory development and adequate conceptual analysis. Defining populations of interest in the context of MGs is required to permit meaningful comparison and meta-analysis between events.

Process

A critique of existing definitions and descriptions of MGs was undertaken. Analyzing gaps in current knowledge, the authors sought to delineate the populations affected by MGs, employing a consensus approach to formulating a population model. The proposed conceptual model evolved through face-to-face group meetings, structured breakout sessions, asynchronous collaboration, and virtual international meetings.

Findings and Interpretation

Reporting on the incidence of health conditions at specific MGs, and comparing those rates between and across events, requires a common understanding of the denominators, or the total populations in question. There are many, nested populations to consider within a MG, such as the population of patients, the population of medical services providers, the population of attendees/audience/participants, the crew, contractors, staff, and volunteers, as well as the population of the host community affected by, but not necessarily attending, the event.

A pictorial representation of a basic population model was generated, followed by a more complex representation, capturing a global-health perspective, as well as academically- and operationally-relevant divisions in MG populations.

Conclusions

Consistent definitions of MG populations will support more rigorous data collection. This, in turn, will support meta-analysis and pooling of data sources internationally, creating a foundation for risk assessment as well as illness and injury prediction modeling. Ultimately, more rigorous data collection will support methodology for evaluating health promotion, harm reduction, and clinical-response interventions at MGs. Delineating MG populations progresses the current body of knowledge of MGs and informs the understanding of the full scope of their health effects.

Lund A , Turris SA , Bowles R , Steenkamp M , Hutton A , Ranse J , Arbon P . Mass-gathering Health Research Foundational Theory: Part 1 - Population Models for Mass Gatherings. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(6):1-7 .

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Adam Lund, MD, FRCPC Emergency Department Royal Columbian Hospital 330 East Columbia Street New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W7, Canada E-mail adam.lund@ubc.ca
References
Hide All
1. Arbon, P. The development of conceptual models for mass-gathering health. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(2):212-217.
2. Arbon, P, Cusack, L, Verdonk, N. Mass gathering public health and emergency medicine literature review: levels of evidence. Austalasian J of Paramed. 2013;10(1):1-5.
3. Tam, JS, Barbeschi, M, Shapovalova, N, Briand, S, Memish, ZA, Kieny, MP. Research agenda for mass gathering: a call to action. Lancet. 2012;12(2):231-239.
4. Ranse, J, Hutton, A. Minimum data set for mass gathering health research and evaluation: a discussion paper. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(6):1-8.
5. Steffen, R, Bouchama, A, Johansson, A, et al. Non-communicable health risks during mass gatherings. Lancet. 2012;12(2):142-149.
6. Turris, SA, Lund, A. Minimum data set for mass-gatherings health research and evaluation: a response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(2):191-193.
7. Abubakar, I, Gautret, P, Brumnette, GW, et al. Global perspectives for prevention of infectious diseases associated with mass gatherings. Lancet. 2012;12(2):66-74.
8. CBC News. Popular Pemberton Music Festival Cancelled. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/popular-pemberton-music-festival-cancelled-for-2009-1.820216. Accessed March 16, 2014.
9. Medical Risk Classification for Mass Gatherings. Delivering a Healthy WA. http://www.public.health.wa.gov.au/cproot/2542/2/Medical%20Risk%20Classification.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2014.
10. World Health Organization. 2008. Communicable disease alert and response: key considerations. http://www.who.int/csr/Mass_gatherings2.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2014.
11. Lund, A, Turris, SA, Bowles, RR. Conceptualizing the impact of special events on community health service levels: an operational analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(5):525-532.
12. Welch, TR. Emergency department volumes and “mass events.” Journal of Pediatrics. 2014;164(2):223-225.
13. Botelho-Nevers, E, Gautret, P. Outbreaks associated to large open air festivals, including music festivals, 1980-2012. Eurosurveill. 2013;18(11):1-10.
14. Molloy, MS, Brady, F, Maleady, K. Impact of a single large mass gathering music event, from a series of such events, on a receiving hospital's emergency department (ED). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(1):S186.
15. Heiby, MJ, Barnhardt, W, Berry, T, Welcher, M, Brady, WJ. The impact of a mass gathering events with an on-site medical management team on municipal 911 emergency medical services. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(1):256-257.
16. Zielioski, A, Pawlak, BJ. Toolbox for implementation of surveillance at mass gatherings: surveillance during mass gatherings. 2013. http://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Prevention/React/Work/wp4/WP_4_ToolBox.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed March 16, 2014.
17. Arbon, P, Bridgewater, FHG, Smith, C. Mass gathering medicine: a predictive model for patient presentation and transport rates. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2001;16(3):150-158.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed