Skip to main content Accessibility help

Reshaping US Navy Pacific Response in Mitigating Disaster Risk in South Pacific Island Nations: Adopting Community-Based Disaster Cycle Management

  • Erik J. Reaves (a1), Michael Termini (a2) and Frederick M. Burkle (a3) (a4)


The US Department of Defense continues to deploy military assets for disaster relief and humanitarian actions around the world. These missions, carried out through geographically located Combatant Commands, represent an evolving role the US military is taking in health diplomacy, designed to enhance disaster preparedness and response capability. Oceania is a unique case, with most island nations experiencing “acute-on-chronic” environmental stresses defined by acute disaster events on top of the consequences of climate change. In all Pacific Island nation-states and territories, the symptoms of this process are seen in both short- and long-term health concerns and a deteriorating public health infrastructure. These factors tend to build on each other. To date, the US military's response to Oceania primarily has been to provide short-term humanitarian projects as part of Pacific Command humanitarian civic assistance missions, such as the annual Pacific Partnership, without necessarily improving local capacity or leaving behind relevant risk-reduction strategies. This report describes the assessment and implications on public health of large-scale humanitarian missions conducted by the US Navy in Oceania. Future opportunities will require the Department of Defense and its Combatant Commands to show meaningful strategies to implement ongoing, long-term, humanitarian activities that will build sustainable, host nation health system capacity and partnerships. This report recommends a community-centric approach that would better assist island nations in reducing disaster risk throughout the traditional disaster management cycle and defines a potential and crucial role of Department of Defense's assets and resources to be a more meaningful partner in disaster risk reduction and community capacity building.

Reaves EJ , Termini M , Burkle FM Jr. Reshaping US Navy Pacific Response in Mitigating Disaster Risk in South Pacific Island Nations: Adopting Community-Based Disaster Cycle Management. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):1-9 .


Corresponding author

Correspondence: Erik J. Reaves, DO, MTM&H US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 Unit 3230 Box 337 DPO, AA 34031 Lima, Peru E-mail


Hide All
1. Burkle, FM Jr, Greenough, PG. Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(3):192-199.
2. Burkle FM Jr. The Decade of the Community: Identifying A Model Framework for Development and Capacity Building. Keynote Address: Presented at the South East Asia Security Assistance Conference. University of Hawaii and the US Pacific Command. Honolulu; 2012.
3. Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative. Country risk profile: Papua New Guinea. 2011. Accessed February 11, 2013.
4. Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative. Country risk profile: Palau. 2011. Accessed February 11, 2013.
5. World Health Organization. Kiribati: Health Profile. 2005. Accessed August 4, 2012.
6. United Nations. Population Distribution, Urbanization, Internal Migration and Development: An International Perspective. Department of Economic and Social Affairs 2011. Accessed August 4, 2012.
7. World Health Organization. Western Pacific Country Health Information Profiles. 2011. Accessed August 4, 2012.
8. Office of Minority Health. Cultural Competency in Disaster Response: A Review of Current Concepts, Policies and Practices. US Department of Health and Human Services 2008; 191. Accessed February 12, 2013.
9. Lagan B. Kiribati: A nation going under. Samoa Observer. Thursday, April 18, 2013. Accessed April 21, 2013.
10. Metcalfe, V, Hayson, S, Gordon, S. Trends and challenges in humanitarian civil-military coordination: a review of the literature. Humanitarian Working Group Working Paper, Overseas Development Institute. May, 2012.
11. Guidelines on the Use of Foreign Military and Civil Defense Assets in Disaster Relief: “Oslo Guidelines”. Revision 1.1 November 2007. Accessed April 11, 2013.
12. World Health Organization. The Cluster Approach. Humanitarian Health Action. Annex 7. Geneva, Switzerland. Accessed April 9, 2013.
13. Burkle, FM, Walker, P. Doctor, lawyer and…aid worker?: making the case for professionalization. InterAction. Monday Developments. 2013;31(3):18-20.
14. Foster, H. Interactive hazard preparation strategy efficacy: considerations for future community engagement programs. Aus J EM. 2013;28(1):8-14.
15. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR). Accessed March 14, 2013.
16. Bessler, M, Seki, K. Civil-military relations in armed conflicts: a humanitarian perspective. Liaison. 2006;3(3). Accessed April 2, 2013.
17. United Nations. Global Assessment Report on Diaster Risk Reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat (UNISDR) 2009. Accessed March 6, 2013.
18. Department of Defense. US Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 3000.05 for Stability Operations. 2009. Accessed August 14, 2012.
19. Department of Defense. Foreign Humanitarian Assistance. Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff 2009. Accessed August 14, 2012.
20. Department of Defense. Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6000.16 for Military Health Support for Stability Operations. 2010. Accessed August 14, 2012.
21. Department of Defense. US Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 2205.02 for Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA) Activities. 2008. Accessed August 14, 2012.
22. Department of State. US Agency for International Development (USAID) Strategic Plan FY 2007-2012. 2007; 23. Accessed August 14, 2012.
23. The National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2011. Redefining America's Military Leadership. 2011. Accessed August 14, 2012.
24. Department of Defense. Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Report. 2010. Accessed August 14, 2012.
25. Department of Defense. US Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 5100.46 for Foreign Disaster Relief (FDR). 2012. Accessed August 14, 2012.
26. Department of Defense. NTTP 3-57.3. Navy Humanitarian and Civic Operations. Naval Warfare Development Command (NWDC) 2009. Accessed August 14, 2012.
27. Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense. 2012. Accessed August 14, 2012.
28. Michaud, J, Moss, K, Kates, J. US Global Health Policy: The US Department of Defense and Global Health. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation 2012;1-45. Accessed August 14, 2012.
29. A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower (CS21). 2007. Accessed August 14, 2012.
30. Reaves, EJ, Schor, KW, Burkle, FM Jr. Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: part I. Qualitative gap analysis of current military and international aid programs. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):230-236.
31. Burkle, FM. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: can the military's role in global health crises be redeemed? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):1-3.
32. Patrick, S, Brown, K. The pentagon and global development: Making sense of the DoD's expanding role. 2007. Accessed February 2, 2013.
33. United Nations. The Millenium Development Goals Report 2011. 2011. Accessed April 29, 2013.
34. Department of Defense Medical Resources Plans and Policy Division OPNAV (N931). Monitoring and Evaluation Principles for Cooperative Health Engagement Missions: Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. 2012.
35. World Health Organization. Aid Effectiveness and Health. 2007; Accessed August, 2012.
36. Webb, NJ, Richter, A. Strategy at the crossroads: The case of the navy hospital ships. 2009. Accessed February 2, 2013.
37. Waller, SG, Ward, JB, Montalvo, M, Cunliffe, C, Beadling, C, Riley, K. A new paradigm for military humanitarian medical operations: mission-generic metrics. Mil Med. 2011;176(8):845-851.
38. Licina, D. Hospital ships adrift? Part 1: a systematic literature review characterizing US Navy hospital ship humanitarian and disaster response, 2004-2012. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):1-10.
39. Drifmeyer, J, Llewellyn, C. Toward more effective humanitarian assistance. Mil Med. 2004;169(3):161-168.
40. Hayson, S. Civil-military coordination: the state of the debate. Humanitarian Practice Network. Humanitarian Exchange.. 2004;56:3-7.
41. Burkle, FM Jr. The changing face of disaster management: implications for healthcare providers in the Pacific Islands. Pac Health Dialog. 2002;9(1):55-57.
42. Levine, S, Pain, A, Bailey, , Fan, L. The relevance of ‘resilience’? Humanitarian Policy group. HPG Policy Brief 49. September 2012:1-4. Accessed April 14, 2013.
43. Burkle, FM Jr. The limits to our capacity: reflections on resiliency, community engagement, and recovery in 21st-century crises. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(Suppl 2):S176-S181.
44. Allenby, B, Fink, J. Toward inherently secure and resilient societies. Science. 2005;309(5737):1034-1036.
45. Ortu, G, Mounier-Jack, S, Coker, R. Pandemic influenza preparedness in Africa is a profound challenge for an already distressed region: analysis of national preparedness plans. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23:161-169.
46. Burkle, FM Jr. Do pandemic preparedness planning systems ignore critical community- and local-level operational challenges? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4(1):24-29.
47. Johnson, MM, Bone, EA, Pready, GN. Taking care of the sick and scared: a local response in pandemic preparedness. Can J Public Health. 2005;96:412-414.
48. Rogers, P. Development of resilient Australia: enhancing the PPRR approach with anticipation, assessment and registration of risks. Aus J Emerg Management. 2011;26(1):54-58; Accessed April 20, 2013.
49. Callaway, DW, Yim, ES, Stack, C, Burkle, FM Jr. Integrating the disaster cycle model into traditional disaster diplomacy concepts. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(1):53-59.
50. Warfield, C. The disaster management cycle. 2008. Accessed April 10, 2013.
51. Jones, R. In search of the ‘prepared community’: the way ahead for Australia? Aus J EM. 2013;28(1):15-19.
52. United Nations. Report of the International Meeting to Review the Implementation of the Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States. 2005. Accessed April 29, 2013.
53. Burkle, FM Jr, Nickerson, JW, von Schreeb, J, et al. Emergency surgery data and documentation reporting forms for sudden-onset humanitarian crises, natural disasters and the existing burden of surgical disease. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(6):577-582.
54. Reaves, EJ, Schor, KW, Burkle, FM Jr. Implementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions: part II. The impact assessment model. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):237-244.
55. Bhutta, ZA, Reddy, KS. Achieving equity in global health: so near and yet so far. JAMA. 2012;307(19):2035-2036.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed