Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Standing Orders for Field Intravenous Lines Do Not Shorten Prehospital Time in Trauma Patients

  • Bartholomew J. Tortella (a1) (a2), Robert F. Lavery (a1) (a2), Ronald P. Cody (a3) and Mindi Salant (a1) (a2) (a4)
Abstract
Study Objective:

No randomized, prospective studies have been conducted that examine how standing orders for establishing intravenous (IV) lines in trauma patients affect prehospital time. The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to determine if standing orders for IV lines in the field shorten prehospital time.

Design:

A prospective, randomized study was conducted.

Setting:

Trauma patients (n = 521) were randomized prospectively on an even-/odd-day basis over a one-year period from 1 April 1988 to 1 April 1989. Patients were sorted into an IV Standing Orders (SO) arm (n = 258) and a No Standing Orders (NO) arm (n = 263) in which On-Line [Direct] Medical Command (OLMC) was required before IV initiation.

Participants:

Trauma patients, paramedics in a high-volume, urban, EMS system, and medical-command physicians on the trauma team at a Level 1 trauma center.

Results:

No significant differences were found in demographics, prehospital vital signs, mechanism of injury, or trauma severity scores between the two treatment arms. Scene times were similar for the two groups (IV SO = 11.4 minutes, and NO = 10.6 minutes, p = .1675) as was IV success rate (92% vs. 88%, p = .1729).

Conclusion:

When compared to OLMC in this EMS system, IV standing orders did not affect scene time. This supports the concept that only spinal stabilization and airway management be performed at the scene and other ALS maneuvers (e.g., IVs) be performed in the ambulance, preferably en route to a Trauma Center. Since IV standing orders had no documented, adverse effects and led to focused, concise radio telemetry reports, this EMS system adopted their use on a permanent basis.

Copyright
Corresponding author
University Hospital, Rm. J-200, 150 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103-2406 USA
Footnotes
Hide All
Presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, 17 January 1991.
Footnotes
References
Hide All
1. Nagel, EL, Hirchmann, JC, Nussenfield, SR, et al. : Telemetry-medical command in coronary and other mobile emergency care systems. JAMA 1970; 214;332388.
2. Lambrew, CT: The experience of the electrocardiogram to a base hospital. Heart and Lung 1974;3:756764.
3. Lambrew, CT, Schaman, WL, Cannon, TH: Emergency medical transport systems: Use of ECG telemetry. Chest 1973;63:477482.
4. Erder, MH, Davidson, SJ, Cheney, RA: On-line medical command in theory and practice. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:261268.
5. Cayten, CG, Oler, J, Walker, K, et al. : The effect of telemetry on urban prehospital cardiac care. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:976981.
6. Pozen, MW, D'Agonstino, RB, Sytkowski, PA, et al. : Effectiveness of prehospital medical control systems: An analysis of the interaction between emergency room physicians and paramedics. Circulation1 1981;63:442447.
7. Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Gainer, PS, et al. : The effect of medical direction on trauma triage. J Trauma 1989;28:235259.
8. Neely, KW, Norton, R, Butkus, E, et al. : The effect of base station contact on ambulance destination. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:906909.
9. Border, JR, Lewis, FR, Aprahamian, C, et al. : Panel: Prehospital trauma care—Stabilize or scoop and run. J Trauma 1983;23:708711.
10. Smith, JP, Bodai, BI: The urban paramedic's scope of practice. JAMA 1985;253:544548.
11. Ornato, JP, Groen, AL: Superiority of standing orders to start an IV during cardiac arrest over base station orders. Nebraska Med J 1985:200201.
12. Holroyd, BR, Knoop, RK, Kallson, G: Medical Control. JAMA 1986;256:10271031.
13. Stewart, RD: When less is more: Teflon and telemetry in the space age. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:992993. Editorial.
14. Gold, CR: Prehospital advanced life support versus “scoop and run” in trauma management. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:797801.
15. Pointer, JE, Osur, MA: Effect of standing orders on field times. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:11191121.
16. Pons, PT, Honigman, B, Moore, EE, et al. : Prehospital advanced life support for critical penetrating wounds to the thorax and abdomen. J Trauma 1985:25:628631.
17. Honigman, B, Rohweder, K, Moore, EE, et al. : Prehospital advanced trauma life support of penetrating cardiac wounds. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:145150.
18. O'Gorman, M, Trabulsky, O, Pilcher, D: Zero-time prehospital IV. J Trauma 1989;29:8486.
19. Pons, PT, Moore, EE, Cusik, JM, et al. : Prehospital venous access in an urban paramedic system—A prospective on-scene analysis. J Trauma 1988;28:14601463.
20. Jones, SE, Nesper, TP, Alcouloumre, E: Prehospital intravenous line placement: A prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:244246.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.