Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Foster, Nadine E Bishop, Annette Bartlam, Bernadette Ogollah, Reuben Barlas, Panos Holden, Melanie Ismail, Khaled Jowett, Sue Kettle, Christine Kigozi, Jesse Lewis, Martyn Lloyd, Alison Waterfield, Jackie and Young, Julie 2016. Evaluating Acupuncture and Standard carE for pregnant women with Back pain (EASE Back): a feasibility study and pilot randomised trial. Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 20, Issue. 33, p. 1.


    Konstantinou, Kika Dunn, Kate M. Ogollah, Reuben Vogel, Steven and Hay, Elaine M. 2015. Characteristics of patients with low back and leg pain seeking treatment in primary care: baseline results from the ATLAS cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,


    McCardle, Lindsay and Hadwin, Allyson F. 2015. Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 43.


    Stynes, Siobhán Konstantinou, Kika Dunn, Kate M. Lewis, Martyn and Hay, Elaine M. 2015. Reliability among clinicians diagnosing low back-related leg pain. European Spine Journal,


    Campbell, Paul Bishop, Annette Dunn, Kate M. Main, Chris J. Thomas, Elaine and Foster, Nadine E. 2013. Conceptual overlap of psychological constructs in low back pain. Pain, Vol. 154, Issue. 9, p. 1783.


    Campbell, Paul Foster, Nadine E. Thomas, Elaine and Dunn, Kate M. 2013. Prognostic Indicators of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: Five-Year Prospective Study. The Journal of Pain, Vol. 14, Issue. 8, p. 873.


    Campbell, Paul Jordan, Kelvin P. and Dunn, Kate M. 2012. The Role of Relationship Quality and Perceived Partner Responses with Pain and Disability in Those with Back Pain. Pain Medicine, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 204.


    Konstantinou, Kika Beardmore, Ruth Dunn, Kate M Lewis, Martyn Hider, Samantha L Sanders, Tom Jowett, Sue Somerville, Simon Stynes, Siobhan van der Windt, Danielle AWM Vogel, Steven and Hay, Elaine M 2012. Clinical course, characteristics and prognostic indicators in patients presenting with back and leg pain in primary care. The ATLAS study protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,


    Dunnl, Kate M. Jordan, Kelvin P. and Croft, Peter R. 2011. Contributions of prognostic factors for poor outcome in primary care low back pain patients. European Journal of Pain, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 313.


    Hill, Jonathan C. Konstantinou, Kika Egbewale, Bolaji E. Dunn, Kate M. Lewis, Martyn and van der Windt, Danielle 2011. Clinical Outcomes Among Low Back Pain Consulters With Referred Leg Pain in Primary Care. Spine, Vol. 36, Issue. 25, p. 2168.


    Hill, Jonathan C. Vohora, Kanchan Dunn, Kate M. Main, Chris J. and Hay, Elaine M. 2010. Comparing the STarT Back Screening Toolʼs Subgroup Allocation of Individual Patients With That of Independent Clinical Experts. The Clinical Journal of Pain, Vol. 26, Issue. 9, p. 783.


    ×
  • Primary Health Care Research & Development, Volume 11, Issue 1
  • January 2010, pp. 93-102

Recall of medication use, self-care activities and pain intensity: a comparison of daily diaries and self-report questionnaires among low back pain patients

  • Kate M. Dunn (a1), Kelvin P. Jordan (a1) and Peter R. Croft (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423609990296
  • Published online: 03 December 2009
Abstract
Aim

We aimed to compare recalled information on medication use, self-care activities and pain intensity among primary care low back pain consulters with diary records of the same events.

Background

Concerns are often expressed regarding the validity of recalled information about past experience of health events such as pain or its treatment. Comparing with information collected using daily diaries is one method of validating recalled findings.

Methods

Patients completed diaries recording their medication use, self-care activities and pain intensity each day for two weeks. Immediately following this period, patients completed questionnaires asking for recall of their medication use, self-care activities and least, worst, usual and current pain for the previous two weeks. The recalled information obtained from the questionnaires was compared with data from the daily diaries using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and κ, with one-sided 95% confidence intervals.

Findings

All 29 participants returned 11 or more diaries. Validity of questionnaire-based recall for medication use and self-care activities was good, with everyone who reported use in the diaries also reporting this on the questionnaires (both κ = 1.0). However, some specific medications (eg, diclofenac) were over-reported in the questionnaires, and some self-care activities (eg, exercises) were under-reported. Combinations of pain intensity ratings were more accurate than single ratings; the mean of the recalled least, usual and current pain intensities was closest to the diary ratings (ICC 0.94, mean difference 0.13). The generalisability of these findings to other settings, recall periods and patient groups remains to be established.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Dr Kate M. Dunn, Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. Email: k.m.dunn@cphc.keele.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

N. Bentzen , T. Christiansen K.M. Pedersen 1989: Self-care within a model for demand for medical care. Social Science and Medicine 29, 185193.

J.M. Bland D.G. Altman 1999: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8, 135160.

J.E. Bolton 1999: Accuracy of recall of usual pain intensity in back pain patients. Pain 83, 533539.

J.E. Broderick , J.E. Schwartz , G. Vikingstad , M. Pribbernow , S. Grossman A.A. Stone 2008: The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain 139, 146157.

J.E. Broderick , A.A. Stone , P. Calvanese , J.E. Schwartz D.C. Turk 2006: Recalled pain ratings: a complex and poorly defined task. Journal of Pain 7, 142149.

A.M. Butz , M. Donithan , M.E. Bollinger , C. Rand R.E. Thompson 2005: Monitoring nebulizer use in children: comparison of electronic and asthma diary data. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 94, 360365.

F.M. Carp A. Carp 1981: The validity, reliability and generalizability of diary data. Experimental Aging Research 7, 281296.

C.E. Cruise , J. Broderick , L. Porter , A. Kaell A.A. Stone 1996: Reactive effects of diary self-assessment in chronic pain patients. Pain 67, 253258.

E.G. Dawson , L.E. Kanim , P. Sra , F.J. Dorey , T.B. Goldstein , R.B. Delamarter H.S. Sandhu 2002: Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: outcomes analysis. Spine 27, 984993.

A. Donner M. Eliasziw 1987: Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine 6, 441448.

K.M. Dunn P.R. Croft 2005: Classification of low back pain in primary care: using ‘bothersomeness’ to identify the most severe cases. Spine 30, 18871892.

K.M. Dunn P.R. Croft 2006: Repeat assessment improves the prediction of prognosis in patients with low back pain in primary care. Pain 126, 1015.

C.B. Freer 1980: Self-care: a health diary study. Medical Care 18, 853861.

M.E. Goossens , M.P. Rutten-van Molken , J.W. Vlaeyen S.M. van der Linden 2000: The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53, 688695.

J. Guzmán , P. Peloso C. Bombardier 1999: Capturing health care utilization after occupational low-back pain: development of an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52, 419427.

R.N. Jamison , S.A. Raymond , J.G. Levine , E.A. Slawsby , S.S. Nedeljkovic N.P. Katz 2001: Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain 91, 277285.

R.N. Jamison , S.A. Raymond , E.A. Slawsby , G.J. McHugo J.C. Baird 2006: Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. Journal of Pain 7, 192199.

M.P. Jensen C.A. McFarland 1993: Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 55, 195203.

M.P. Jensen , J.A. Turner J.M. Romano 1994: What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain 58, 387392.

M.P. Jensen , J.A. Turner , J.M. Romano L.D. Fisher 1999: Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 83, 157162.

M.P. Jensen , L.R. Turner , J.A. Turner J.M. Romano 1996: The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 67, 3540.

K. Jordan , K. Dziedzic , P.W. Jones , B.N. Ong P.T. Dawes 2000: The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. Rheumatology 39, 382388.

J.C. Lefebvre F.J. Keefe 2002: Memory for pain: the relationship of pain catastrophizing to the recall of daily rheumatoid arthritis pain. Clinical Journal of Pain 18, 5663.

S.J. Linton K.G. Götestam 1983: A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance. Pain 17, 5765.

S.J. Linton L. Melin 1982: The accuracy of remembering chronic pain. Pain 13, 281285.

R. Lousberg , A.J. Schmidt , N.H. Groenman , L. Vendrig C.I. Dijkman-Caes 1997: Validating the MPI-DLV using experience sampling data. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 20, 195206.

R.W. McGorry , B.S. Webster , S.H. Snook S.M. Hsiang 1999: Accuracy of pain recall in chronic and recurrent low back pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 9, 169178.

S. Morley 2007: Thanks for the memory. Pain 132, 231232.

C. Raselli J.E. Broderick 2007: The association of depression and neuroticism with pain reports: a comparison of momentary and recalled pain assessment. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 62, 313320.

H. Raspe T. Kohlmann 1994: Disorders characterised by pain: a methodological review of population surveys. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 48, 531537.

M. Roland R. Morris 1983: A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8, 141144.

F. Salaffi , A. Stancati , C. Alberto Silvestri , A. Ciapetti W. Grassi 2004: Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. European Journal of Pain 8, 283291.

J.E. Schwartz A.A. Stone 1998: Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychology 17, 616.

P.E. Shrout J.L. Fleiss 1979: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86, 420428.

W.F. Stewart , R.B. Lipton , K.B. Kolodner , J. Sawyer , C. Lee J.N. Liberman 2000: Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 88, 4152.

A.A. Stone , J.E. Broderick , S.S. Shiffman J.E. Schwartz 2004: Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain 107, 6169.

A.A. Stone , R.C. Kessler J.A. Haythornthwaite 1991: Measuring daily events and experiences: decisions for the researcher. Journal of Personality 59, 575607.

L.M. Verbrugge 1980: Health diaries. Medical Care 18, 7395.

M. Von Korff , M.P. Jensen P. Karoly 2000: Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research. Spine 25, 31403151.

A.S. Zigmond R.P. Snaith 1983: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67, 361370.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Primary Health Care Research & Development
  • ISSN: 1463-4236
  • EISSN: 1477-1128
  • URL: /core/journals/primary-health-care-research-and-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: