Skip to main content

‘Wads up, doc’ – trends in British newspapers’ reporting of general practitioners’ pay

  • Fran Tanner (a1), Robbie Foy (a2) and Wendy Harrison (a3)

To analyse trends in newspaper reporting of British general practitioners’ (GPs’) pay before and after the introduction of the new General Medical Services (GMS) contract.


The introduction of the new GMS contract for GPs in 2004 linked pay to performance. There may have been a range of wider consequences from this, including changes in how GPs are portrayed in the media.


We retrospectively analysed the internet archives of five British newspapers over 2001–2008. The search terms ‘doctor’ or ‘GP’ and ‘pay’ were used in a text search. After checking the relevance of full text articles, we randomly sampled included articles to achieve a quota of up to five articles per newspaper per year. We scored article content using criteria to determine whether GPs were depicted in a positive or negative manner. Summary scores for each article were plotted using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS). We used a grounded approach to identify key themes.


Newspaper coverage of GPs’ salaries became unfavourable following the introduction of the new contract. Initial recognition of GPs’ demanding working conditions and relatively poor rewards for public service transformed into concerns about unfairly excessive income and poor use of public money. Although public trust in GPs has remained fairly robust to media criticism, it cannot be taken for granted as continued negative newspaper coverage of their pay may start to erode public trust in the profession.

Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Professor Robbie Foy, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK. Email:
Hide All
Anonymous. 2009: MPs’ expenses: would you pay a thief not to steal from you? The Daily Telegraph.
Campbell, S., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Sibbald, B.Roland, M. 2009: Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. New England Journal of Medicine 361, 368378.
Cleveland, W.Devlin, S. 1988: Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of American Statistical Association 83, 596610.
Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Kontopantelis, E.Reeves, D. 2008: Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework. Lancet 372, 728736.
Hargreaves, I., Lewis, J.Speers, T. 2003: Towards a better map: science, the public and the media. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
Iacobucci, G. 2009: Salaried GP jobs account for 80% of new posts. London: Pulse.
IPSOS MORI. 2001 [online]: Retrieved 2 February 2009 from World Wide Web:
Mannion, R.Davies, H. 2008: Payment for performance in health care. The British Medical Journal 336, 306308.
National Readers Survey. 2009 [online]: Retrieved 3 February 2009 from World Wide Web:
Pope, C., Ziebland, S.Mays, N. 2000: Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. The British Medical Journal 320, 114116.
Richards, N.Coulter, A. 2007: Is the NHS becoming more patient-centred? Trends from The National Surveys of NHS patients in England 2002–07. Oxford: Picker Institute Europe.
Roland, M. 2004: Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care -- a major experiment in the United Kingdom. New England Journal of Medicine 351, 14481454.
The Health and Social Care Information Centre. 2010: Earnings and Expenses 2007/08. Final Report.
The Information Centre. 2007: Family doctors in England earn more than counterparts elsewhere in the UK. London.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Primary Health Care Research & Development
  • ISSN: 1463-4236
  • EISSN: 1477-1128
  • URL: /core/journals/primary-health-care-research-and-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed