Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:00:02.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Repeatability and reproducibility of taste panel measurements on the meat from a commercial population of beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

J. L. Gill*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom
S. C. Bishop
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom
P. Wiener
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The most important element in consumer enjoyment of meat is tenderness, closely followed by flavour, with variation in these traits having a significant impact on consumer satisfaction (Casas et al. 2006). In order to forge improvements in these traits, either through quantitative breeding or molecular genetics, it is essential that there is a reliable method of trait testing. Sensory data, as collected using a taste panel, are subject to high measurement error as well as problems associated with subjectivity. Unfortunately these sensory panels are a necessary step in the improvement of the above mentioned beef traits, as no machine can measure the range of interacting characteristics that contribute to eating quality and palatability (Warriss 2000). This study aimed to test the repeatability and reproducibility values for seven sensory beef traits assessed by a taste panel operating in a commercial setting.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BS7767 1993. BSI.Google Scholar
Casas, E., White, S., Wheeler, T., Shackelford, S., Koohmaraie, M., Riley, D., Chase, C., Johnson, D., Smith, T. 2006. Journal of Animal Science. 84, 520–525.Google Scholar
Warriss, P.D. 2000. CABI Publishing.Google Scholar