Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Comparison of different spectral population models

  • Mina Koleva (a1) (a2), Philippe Prugniel (a1) (a3), Pierre Ocvirk (a4), Damien Le Borgne (a4), Igor Chilingarian (a1) (a5) and Caroline Soubiran (a6)...
Abstract

We have compared simple stellar populations (SSPs) generated with different population synthesis tools: BC03, Vazdekis and Pégase.HR and different stellar libraries: ELODIE3.1, SteLib and MILES. We find that BC03/SteLib SSPs are biased toward solar metallicity, however Pégase.HR/ELODIE3.1 and Vazdekis/MILES are extremely consistent. The extensive coverage of the space of atmospheric parameters in the large stellar libraries allows precise synthesis for a large range of ages (0.1 .. 10 Gyr) and metallicities (−2 .. +0.4 dex) limited by the quality of the determination of stellar parameters (temperature scale of the giants).

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparison of different spectral population models
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparison of different spectral population models
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparison of different spectral population models
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
mina.koleva@obs.univ-lyon1.fr
References
Hide All
Bruzual, & Charlot, , 2003 Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S., 2003, MNRAS 344, 1000
Koleva, M. et al. , 2006, astro-ph/0602362
Leborgne, J.-F. et al. , 2003, A&A 402, 433
LeBorgne, D. Borgne, D. et al. , 2004, A&A 425, 881
Lejeune, Th., Cuisinier, F., & Buser, R., 1997, A&AS 125, 229
Ocvirk, P. et al. , 2006, MNRAS 365, 74
Prugniel, Ph. & Soubiran, C., 2001, A&A, 369, 1048
Prugniel, Ph. & Soubiran, C., 2004, astro.ph-/0409214
Sánchez-Blázquez, P. et al. , 2006, MNRAS 371, 701
Vazdekis, A., 1999, ApJ 513, 224
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
  • ISSN: 1743-9213
  • EISSN: 1743-9221
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-international-astronomical-union
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed