Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:31:58.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Molecular Cloud Population of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Tony Wong
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA; wongt@illinois.edu
Annie Hughes
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany
Jürgen Ott
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM, USA
Jorge L. Pineda
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA
Erik Muller
Affiliation:
ALMA-J Project Office, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have mapped an extensive sample of molecular clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) at 11 pc resolution in the CO(1-0) line as part of the Magellanic Mopra Assessment (MAGMA). We identify clouds as regions of connected CO emission and determine their sizes, line widths, and fluxes. We find that GMCs are not preferentially located in regions of high Hi line width or velocity gradient, and that there is no clear Hi column density threshold for CO detection. The luminosity function of CO clouds is steeper than dN/dLL−2, suggesting a substantial fraction of mass in low-mass clouds. The correlation between size and linewidth, while apparent for the largest emission structures, breaks down when those structures are decomposed into smaller structures. The virial parameter (the ratio of a cloud's kinetic to gravitational energy) shows a wide range of values and exhibits no clear trends with the likelihood of hosting young stellar object (YSO) candidates, suggesting that this parameter is a poor reflection of the evolutionary state of a cloud. More massive GMCs are more likely to harbor a YSO candidate, and more luminous YSOs are more likely to be coincident with detectable CO emission, confirming GMCs as the principal sites of massive star formation.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Cohen, R. S., et al. 1988, ApJ, 331, L95Google Scholar
Fukui, Y., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 745Google Scholar
Fukui, Y., et al. 2008, ApJS, 178, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruendl, R. A. & Chu, Y. 2009, ApJS, 184, 172Google Scholar
Hughes, A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2065Google Scholar
Kim, S., et al. 2003, ApJS, 148, 473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C. F. & Krumholz, M. R. 2010, ApJ, 709, 308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosolowsky, E. & Leroy, A. 2006, PASP, 118, 590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. C., MCELS Team 1999, IAU Symposium 190, 28Google Scholar
Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., & Yahil, A. 1987, ApJ, 319, 730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, B. A.et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, T., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, T., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 16Google Scholar