Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:29:28.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What can isolated elliptical galaxies tell us about Cold Dark Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

Richard R. Lane
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160 C, Concepción, Chile
Tom Richtler
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160 C, Concepción, Chile
Ricardo Salinas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Due to their environment isolated elliptical galaxies (IEs) should not be undergoing extant evolutionary processes yet many IEs have interacting dwarf companions, and where no merger remnants are visible IEs are often dynamically young. Furthermore, some IEs do not require dark matter to explain their dynamics. However, according to Cold Dark Matter (CDM) simulations all elliptical galaxies should be dark matter dominated, even if isolated, and IEs are much rarer in nature than predicted by CDM. Moreover, merging at the ~107 M level was recently discovered in the M31 system, showing that hierarchical merging may indeed be scale-free, as predicted by CDM. It seems a natural question to ask: what can IEs tell us about CDM? Here we analyse several IEs as probes of CDM. Our results spawn many new questions.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Amorisco, N. C., Evans, N. W., & van de Ven, G. 2014, Nature, 507, 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Famaey, B., Gentile, G., Bruneton, J.-P., & Zhao, H. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 75, 063002Google Scholar
Kelson, D. D., Zabludoff, A. I., Williams, K. A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 576, 720Google Scholar
Lane, R. R., Salinas, R., & Richtler, T. 2013, A&A, 549, A148Google Scholar
Lane, R. R., Salinas, R., & Richtler, T. 2015, A&A, 574, A93Google Scholar
Mamon, G. A. & Łokas, E. L. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 705Google Scholar
Niemi, S.-M., Heinämäki, P., Nurmi, P., & Saar, E. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 477Google Scholar
Richtler, T., Salinas, R., Lane, R. R., Hilker, M., & Schirmer, M. 2015, A&A, 574, A21Google Scholar
Salinas, R., Richtler, T., Bassino, L. P., Romanowsky, A. J., & Schuberth, Y. 2012, A&A, 538, A87Google Scholar
Schuberth, Y., Richtler, T., Hilker, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A115Google Scholar