Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:49:00.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations between regional and whole-body fat and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic men of White and Black ethnicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2017

O. Hakim
Affiliation:
Division of Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, SE1 1UL, UK Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, SE1 1UL, UK
G. Charles-Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, SE1 1UL, UK
B. Whitcher
Affiliation:
Klarismo Ltd, UK
H. Shuaib
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, SE1 1UL, UK Klarismo Ltd, UK
L.M. Goff
Affiliation:
Division of Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, SE1 1UL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 

Differences in regional and whole-body (WB) fat deposition are consistently reported between people of Black and White ethnicity( Reference Heymsfield, Peterson and Thomas 1 ). People of Black ethnicity have lower waist circumference (WC), due to less visceral adipose tissue (VAT), despite a 2–3-fold higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to Whites( Reference DeBoer 2 ); thus, an under-diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome, for a given BMI, is common in Black populations compared to other ethnic groups. This study aimed to investigate relationships between regional and WB fat depots and insulin sensitivity (IS) in White European (WE) and Black West African (BWA) men with T2D.

In a cross-sectional study, 17 WE and 17 BWA men with T2D underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Siemens 1·5-Tesla) from neck to knee to assess subcutaneous and VAT. MRI data was analysed by an automated quantitative method (Klarismo Ltd.) to determine WB and regional fat depots. IS was measured using a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, presented as the glucose disposal rate (M) divided by mean insulin concentration (M/I).

The ethnic groups were well matched for age, weight and BMI (all p > 0·05). There were no ethnic differences in IS (WE: 0·26 (IQR 0·19) vs BWA: 0·26 (IQR 0·19) mg/m2 BSA min−1/pmol/l, p = 0·524), % WB fat (WE: 30·2 (SD 6·0) vs BWA: 26·4 (SD 5·8) %, p = 0·070), subcutaneous leg fat (WE: 2082 (SD 743) vs BWA: 2019 (SD 630) ml, p = 0·791) and WB subcutaneous fat (WE: 13338 (IQR 6746) vs BWA: 12062 (IQR 6619) ml, p = 0·153), however the BWA men had significantly lower WC (WE: 112 (SD 13·4) vs BWA: 103 (SD 8·6) cm, p = 0·031), VAT (WE: 6769 (SD 2729) vs BWA: 4132 (SD 1190) ml, p = 0·001) and subcutaneous trunk fat (WE: 9378 (IQR 4531) vs BWA: 7660 (IQR 4378) ml, p = 0·040) compared to the WE men. IS was significantly inversely associated with WC and BMI as well as regional and WB adiposity in the WE men, whereas in the BWA men, significant inverse associations were only found with WB adiposity and subcutaneous fat of the left thigh (Table 1).

Table 1. Associations between insulin sensitivity (M/I) and adiposity measures in BWA and WE men

Pearson's correlation analysis; significant correlations reported where: *p < 0·05, **p < 0·01

Ethnic differences exist in the relationship between IS and WB and regional measures of adiposity that are linked to the metabolic syndrome and T2D, between men of WE and BWA ethnicity. The present study suggests that WB fat may be a better indication of increased risk of T2D in BWA men instead of the commonly used waist circumference.

References

1. Heymsfield, SB, Peterson, CM, Thomas, DM et al. (2016) Obes Rev 17, 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. DeBoer, MD (2011) Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 6, 279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Associations between insulin sensitivity (M/I) and adiposity measures in BWA and WE men