- Con A
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
PUFA have an important role in shaping and regulating inflammatory processes and responses (Calder, Reference Calder2006). The balance of n-6 and n-3 PUFA might be important in determining the development and severity of inflammatory responses (Calder, Reference Calder2006). Thus, a high intake of n-6 PUFA, particularly arachidonic acid (ARA; 20:4n-6), could potentiate inflammatory processes and so could predispose to or exacerbate inflammatory diseases. Alterations in the food chain and increased consumption of vegetable oils over the past century have led to alterations in n-6 and n-3 PUFA intakes, in favour of n-6 PUFA (Simopoulos, Reference Simopoulos1998). This development is likely to have increased the proportion of ARA in inflammatory cell phospholipids, as cell and tissue levels partly reflect dietary intake. Unfortunately, however, historical data to confirm this outcome are not available. On the other hand, increased consumption of n-3 PUFA, particularly the long-chain n-3 PUFA EPA (20:5n-3) and DHA (22:6n-3), increases the proportions of these fatty acids in inflammatory cell phospholipids (Calder, Reference Calder2001a). The recognition that EPA and DHA have anti-inflammatory properties (Calder, Reference Calder2006) suggests that increasing their intake corrects the n-6 and n-3 PUFA balance, and so may act to decrease the risk of inflammatory conditions and be of benefit to patients with inflammatory diseases.
Some of the most important causes of death and disability in man are characterised by exaggerated inflammation and excessive formation of inflammatory eicosanoids and cytokines. These conditions and diseases include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, cachexia and inflammatory bowel diseases. In addition, many other diseases and conditions that are important causes of death and disability in developed regions have an inflammatory component that may be less pronounced. The latter include CVD, cerebrovascular disease, unipolar major depression, neurodegenerative disease, Alzheimer's disease, allergy, asthma, type 1 and type 2 diabetes and obesity. The onset of some of these disorders has been associated with low consumption of fish (which contain long-chain n-3 PUFA) and long-chain n-3 PUFA; in particular CVD (Daviglus et al. Reference Daviglus, Stamler, Orencia, Dyer, Liu, Greenland, Walsh, Morris and Shekelle1997; Oomen et al. Reference Oomen, Feskens, Rasanen, Fidanza, Nissinen, Menotti, Kok and Kromhout2000; Hallgren et al. Reference Hallgren, Hallmans, Jansson, Marklund, Huhtasaari, Schutz, Stromberg, Vessby and Skerfving2001), depression (Hibbeln, Reference Hibbeln1998, Reference Hibbeln2002) and Alzheimer's disease (Morris et al. Reference Morris, Evans, Bienias, Tangney, Bennett, Wilson, Aggarwal and Schneider2003). The role of excess inflammation in neural disorders is poorly understood. The essentiality of long-chain n-3 PUFA, particularly DHA as a structural component, for normal neural function may explain much of their importance. Some disorders with a more-pronounced and clearly-defined inflammatory character such as COPD (Murray & Lopez, Reference Murray and Lopez1997), asthma (Bach, Reference Bach2002) and Crohn's disease (Bach, Reference Bach2002) have become more prevalent in most Western societies in the past decades, in parallel with greatly increased intake of n-6 PUFA. Clear associations between the risk of their onset and a shifted balance of n-6 PUFA and n-3 PUFA intake are lacking, but many investigators have recognised the potential of long-chain n-3 PUFA in dampening excessive inflammation in most of the inflammatory diseases and conditions listed earlier (Calder, Reference Calder2006).
A large number of clinical investigations with long-chain n-3 PUFA in chronic inflammatory disorders are now available, particularly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases and asthma (Calder, Reference Calder2006). Generally, these studies have focused on disease-specific clinical outcomes rather than on markers of immunomodulation. In contrast, a large number of investigations with long-chain n-3 PUFA focusing on markers of immunomodulation have been performed with healthy subjects (Calder, Reference Calder2001a). However, a common feature of intervention studies involving healthy subjects and some studies of subjects with inflammatory disorders is the measurement of similar immune markers. It is possible that the sensitivity of the immune system to interventions such as n-3 PUFA may be different in subjects with an inflammatory condition as compared with healthy subjects for whom the immune system may be buffered to a larger extent against modulation by such intervention. A difference in sensitivity would have important implications for the transfer of information gained from studies of healthy subjects to patient populations with inflammatory conditions, e.g. for establishing dose levels for specific applications. Thus, the current report reviews the immunomodulatory effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA in healthy human subjects as well as in patients with chronic disorders. The aim of the present review is to explore the presence of dose-related effects and differences between populations with different immune states. In order to make this comparison the present review will focus on the measurements that have been reported in studies involving healthy subjects as well as those reported in some studies of subjects with inflammatory disorders; i.e. lymphocyte proliferation, natural killer (NK) cell activity and production of cytokines by monocytes and lymphocytes.
Dietary fatty acids, the inflammatory response and T-cell-mediated immunity
The key link between fatty acids, inflammation and immunity is that eicosanoids, which are among the most important mediators and regulators of inflammation and immune responses, are generated from C20 PUFA. Since inflammatory cells typically contain a high proportion of the n-6 PUFA ARA and low proportions of other C20 PUFA (Calder, Reference Calder2001a), ARA is usually the major substrate for eicosanoid synthesis. Eicosanoids, which include PG, thromboxanes, leukotrienes (LT) and other oxidised derivatives, are generated from ARA by the action of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase enzymes. These mediators are involved in modulating the intensity and duration of inflammatory responses (for reviews, see Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Austen and Soberman1990; Tilley et al. Reference Tilley, Coffman and Koller2001), have cell- and stimulus-specific sources and frequently have opposing effects (Calder, Reference Calder2006). Thus, the overall physiological (or pathophysiological) outcome will depend on the cells present, the nature of the stimulus, the timing of eicosanoid generation, the concentrations of different eicosanoids generated and the sensitivity of target cells and tissues to the eicosanoids generated. In general, pro-inflammatory roles have been ascribed to PGE2 and 4-series LT derived from ARA. For example, PGE2 induces fever, pain, vasodilation and vascular permeability, while LTB4 is chemotactic for leucocytes and induces the release of reactive oxygen species by neutrophils and inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6) by macrophages (Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Austen and Soberman1990; Tilley et al. Reference Tilley, Coffman and Koller2001). In relation to cell-mediated immunity, PGE2 inhibits T-cell proliferation, the production of T-helper (Th)-1 type cytokines (IL-2 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ)) by T-cells and promotes IgE production by B-cells. In contrast, LTB4 promotes the production of IL-2 and IFN-γ by T-cells, and enhances NK cell activity.
Animal feeding studies have shown a strong positive relationship between the amount of ARA in inflammatory cells and the ability of those cells to produce eicosanoids such as PGE2 (Peterson et al. Reference Peterson, Jeffery, Thies, Sanderson, Newsholme and Calder1998). In turn, the amount of ARA in inflammatory cells can be increased by including ARA in the diet of rats (Peterson et al. Reference Peterson, Jeffery, Thies, Sanderson, Newsholme and Calder1998) or by increasing the amount of ARA in the diet of human subjects (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001c). The amount of ARA in inflammatory cells may also be influenced by the dietary intake of its precursor linoleic acid (18:2n-6), although the range of linoleic acid intake over which this relationship occurs has not been defined for man. The role of ARA as a precursor for the synthesis of eicosanoids indicates the potential for dietary n-6 PUFA (linoleic acid or ARA) to influence inflammatory and immune processes. The influence of increased dietary ARA has been investigated in two studies in healthy human subjects. In one study (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson and Mackey1998a) healthy young males supplemented their diets with 1·5 g ARA/d for 7 weeks. This treatment was found to result in a marked increase in the production of PGE2 and LTB4 by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)- stimulated mononuclear cells. However, production of TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 by the latter was not found to be significantly altered (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson and Mackey1998a). Similarly, ARA was found to have no effect on mitogen-stimulated T-cell proliferation (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson, Schmidt, Mackey and Kyle1997), NK cell activity (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson, Schmidt, Mackey and Kyle1997) or IL-2 production by mitogen-stimulated T-cells (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson, Schmidt, Mackey and Kyle1998a). Thus, increased ARA intake may result in changes indicative of selectively increased inflammation or inflammatory responses in man. In another study (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001a,Reference Thies, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Yaqoob, Newsholme and Calderb,Reference Thies, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Yaqoob, Newsholme and Calderc) elderly subjects supplemented their diets with 0·7 g ARA/d for 12 weeks. This treatment was found to have no effect on LPS-stimulated production of TNFα, IL-1β or IL-6 by mononuclear cells (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001a), mitogen-stimulated T-cell proliferation (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001c), production of IL-2 and IFN-γ by T-cells in response to mitogen (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001c) or NK cell activity (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001b). Taken together these studies suggest that moderately-increased intake of ARA by healthy subjects results in the incorporation of ARA into cells involved in inflammatory responses (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001c) but does not affect the production of inflammatory cytokines, T-cell responses or NK cell activity (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001a,Reference Thies, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Yaqoob, Newsholme and Calderb,Reference Thies, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Yaqoob, Newsholme and Calderc), although the production of inflammatory eicosanoids is increased (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson and Mackey1998a).
Increased consumption of the long-chain n-3 PUFA EPA and DHA results in increased proportions of these fatty acids in inflammatory cell phospholipids (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Hoover, Williams, Sperling, Ravalese, Spur, Robinson, Corey, Lewis and Austen1985; Endres et al. Reference Endres, Ghorbani, Kelley, Georgilis, Lonnemann and van der Meer1989; Gibney & Hunter, Reference Gibney and Hunter1993; Sperling et al. Reference Sperling, Benincaso, Knoell, Larkin, Austen and Robinson1993; Caughey et al. Reference Caughey, Mantzioris, Gibson, Cleland and James1996; Healy et al. Reference Healy, Wallace, Miles, Calder and Newsholm2000; Yaqoob et al. Reference Yaqoob, Pala, Cortina-Borja, Newsholme and Calder2000). The incorporation of EPA and DHA into human inflammatory cells occurs in a dose–response fashion (Healy et al. Reference Healy, Wallace, Miles, Calder and Newsholm2000) and is partly at the expense of ARA. Since there is less substrate available for synthesis of eicosanoids from ARA, fish oil supplementation of the human diet has been shown to result in decreased production of ARA-derived eicosanoids by inflammatory cells (for references, see Calder, Reference Calder2006). Whereas these studies used fish oil providing both EPA and DHA, Kelley et al. (Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson, Schmidt, Ferretti, Erickson, Yu, Chandra and Mackey1999) have demonstrated that 6 g DHA/d results in decreased production of PGE2 (by 60%) and LTB4 (by 75%) by LPS-stimulated mononuclear cells.
EPA is also able to act as a substrate for both cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase enzymes, giving rise to eicosanoids with a slightly different structure from those formed from ARA. Thus, fish oil supplementation of the human diet has been shown to result in increased production of 5-series LT and 5-hydroxyeicosapentaenoic acid by inflammatory cells (for references, see Calder, Reference Calder2006). The functional importance of this difference is that the mediators formed from EPA are frequently less potent than those formed from ARA (Goldman et al. Reference Goldman, Pickett and Goetzl1983; Lee et al. Reference Lee, Menica-Huerta, Shih, Corey, Lewis and Austen1984; Bagga et al. Reference Bagga, Wang, Farias-Eisner, Glaspy and Reddy2003), although it is not always the case (Dooper et al. Reference Dooper, Wassink, M'Rabet and Graus2002; Miles et al. Reference Miles, Allen and Calder2002, Reference Miles, Aston and Calder2003). The reduction in generation of ARA-derived mediators that accompanies fish oil consumption has led to the notion that fish oil is anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory.
In addition to long-chain n-3 PUFA modulating the generation of eicosanoids from ARA and to EPA acting as substrate for the generation of alternative eicosanoids, recent studies have identified a novel group of mediators, the E- and D-series resolvins formed from EPA and DHA respectively, that appear to exert anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory actions (for reviews, see Serhan et al. Reference Serhan, Arita, Hong and Gotlinger2004; Serhan, Reference Serhan2005).
Through the changed profiles of production of eicosanoids and other mediators, n-3 PUFA are expected to influence inflammatory processes and immune responses (Calder, Reference Calder2003, Reference Calder2006). Cell-culture and animal experiments have confirmed this expectation, although they have often involved high levels of exposure to the fatty acids under study and other experimental conditions that are not transferable to the human setting. Data from cell-culture and animal models reporting inflammatory and immune outcomes have been reviewed in detail elsewhere (Calder, Reference Calder2001a, Reference Calder2003, Reference Calder2006; Calder et al. Reference Calder, Yaqoob, Thies, Wallace and Miles2002) and will not be further discussed here.
Effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA on immune markers in healthy subjects
There is a great deal of diversity in the measurements reported in the large number of studies investigating the effects of fish oil and other sources of EPA and DHA on markers of immune function in healthy subjects. The objective of the present review is to explore the extent to which long-chain n-3 PUFA influence immune outcomes in healthy subjects and how the effects in healthy subjects relate to those seen in patients with disorders characterised by the presence of (chronic) inflammation. Thus, the review is limited to immune markers reported in a substantial number of studies of healthy subjects as well as in studies of subjects with inflammatory disorders. The markers selected according to these criteria are ex vivo mitogen-induced T lymphocyte proliferation, NK cell activity, mitogen-induced cytokine production by lymphocytes and cytokine production by monocytes. Some of the best-quality markers of immunomodulation, e.g. delayed-type hypersensitivity response and vaccine-specific antibody response (Albers et al. Reference Albers, Antoine, Bourdet-Sicard, Calder, Gleeson, Lesourd, Samartin, Sanderson, Van Loo, Vas Dias and Watzl2005), are reported in too few studies to contribute to the objective of the present overview. Thus, the reviewed data do not provide a complete overview of all available data on the effects of dietary supplementation with EPA and DHA on immune function in healthy subjects.
Selected data are presented in Tables 1–3, in which studies are listed according to ascending EPA and DHA intake. This form of presentation was chosen to provide a clearer picture of potential dose-dependent effects. In addition, the percentage change associated with increased intake of n-3 PUFA reported in each study is depicted in Figs. 1–3 to help explore the presence of potential trends in results that were not shown to be significant, as studies could potentially lack the statistical power to find significance because of their small sample size and the large inter-individual variance in outcomes that is generally reported (see Albers et al. Reference Albers, Antoine, Bourdet-Sicard, Calder, Gleeson, Lesourd, Samartin, Sanderson, Van Loo, Vas Dias and Watzl2005). The current review covers studies with oral supplementation of fish oil capsules, purified EPA and/or DHA supplements, fish oil-enriched foods or diets with well-defined long-chain n-3 PUFA enrichment.
DB, double-blind; PC, placebo-controlled; R, randomised; ALA, α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3); STA, stearidonic acid (18:4n-3); GLA, γ-linolenic acid (18:3n-6); Con A, concanavalin A; PHA, phytohaemagglutinin; ↓, reduction; FO, fish oil.
* The cohorts are listed according to ascending dose of EPA+DHA.
† The effect is shown if it was significant (P<0·05).
DB, double-blind; PC, placebo-controlled; R, randomised; ALA, α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3); STA, stearidonic acid (18:4n-3); GLA, γ-linolenic acid (18:3n-6); Con A, concanavalin A; PHA, phytohaemagglutinin; PWM, pokeweed mitogen; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; ↓, decrease; ↑, increase.
* The cohorts are listed according to ascending dose of EPA+DHA.
† The effect is shown if it was significant (P<0·05).
DB, double-blind; PC, placebo-controlled; R, randomised; ALA, α-linolenic acid (18: 3n-3); STA, stearidonic acid (18: 4n-3); GLA, γ-linolenic acid (18: 3n-6); Con A, concanavalin A; PHA, phytohaemagglutinin; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; ↓, reduction; ↑, increase.
* The cohorts are listed according to ascending dose of EPA+DHA.
† Cells were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide unless stated otherwise.
‡ The effect is shown if it was significant (P<0·05).
Effects of EPA and DHA on ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation
The effects of EPA and DHA on ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation in healthy subjects have been reported in fourteen publications at twenty-seven different dose levels ranging from 0·2 to 7 g EPA+DHA/d (Table 1). Seven of these studies had a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study design. Stimulants used to induce lymphocyte proliferation were concanavalin A (Con A) or phytohaemagglutinin (PHA), which are both mitogens for T-cells. In all cases, cells were from peripheral blood and they were frequently studied as a purified preparation of mononuclear cells, which comprise a mixture of lymphocytes and monocytes in an approximate ratio of 85:15.
Significantly increased lymphocyte proliferation (P<0·05) was found in only one cohort, at a dose level of 2·0 g EPA+DHA/d (Trebble et al. Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b). In this open study, which investigated effects of increasing dose levels from baseline to 0·3, 1·0 and 2·0 g/d, a trend towards a dose–response relationship was found (Trebble et al. Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b) that was accompanied by a dose-dependent decrease in PGE2 production and an increased IFN-γ production at the highest intake level. Decreased lymphocyte proliferation was reported in seven treatment cohorts at dose levels of 0·2–7·0 g EPA+DHA/d. Five of these seven studies used an open trial design. In one of the two blinded studies the reported decrease in lymphocyte proliferation was only significantly different (P<0·05) compared with baseline values but not compared with the placebo values (Bechoua et al. Reference Bechoua, Dubois, Vericel, Chapuy, Lagarde and Prigent2003). In nineteen treatment cohorts no significant effect on lymphocyte proliferation was reported; fourteen of these cohorts were in studies with a double blind placebo-controlled randomised design. In one of these studies the lymphocyte proliferation response to Con A was found to decrease significantly in all treatments (P<0·05), including the placebo, illustrating the importance of an adequate placebo control (Wallace et al. Reference Wallace, Miles and Calder2003). This finding emphasises that caution should be exercised in the interpretation of the results of open studies, since the studies with better-quality designs and similar dose levels generally do not confirm their findings.
Fig. 1 illustrates that those studies that reported significant (P<0·05) effects of n-3 PUFA were those that found the largest percentage changes in lymphocyte proliferation from baseline (i.e. before n-3 PUFA treatment). The cohorts with significantly decreased lymphocyte proliferation received doses of n-3 PUFA that seem randomly spread over the complete dose range studied, indicating the absence of a clear dose–response relationship.
Thus, while there is evidence in the literature to suggest that long-chain n-3 PUFA decrease the proliferative capacity of T lymphocytes, even more evidence suggests that there is no significant effect; there is relatively little evidence from healthy human volunteer studies to suggest that fish oil enhances T lymphocyte proliferation. The reasons for these different findings are not apparent. Many confounding factors have been suggested, such as gender, age, different vitamin E content of the capsules used and variations in cell-culture conditions (see Calder, Reference Calder2001a). However, most of the factors that could potentially contribute to the variance between cohorts do not consistently influence the EPA and DHA effects in more than one study. For instance, Kramer and co-workers (Kramer et al. Reference Kramer, Schoene, Douglass, Judd, Ballard-Barbash, Taylor, Bhagavan and Nair1991) have found a significant decrease in lymphocyte proliferation following a high dose of fish oil, and this effect is completely reversed by concurrent supplementation of vitamin E. In contrast, Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b) have found no effect of co-administering an antioxidant mix with a fish oil supplement, and all other studies that have found decreased lymphocyte proliferation used capsules enriched with vitamin E (apart from one study that used fish; Meydani et al. Reference Meydani, Lichtenstein, Cornwall, Meydani, Goldin, Rasmussen, Dinarello and Schaefer1993). On the other hand, the observation by Meydani et al. (Reference Meydani, Endres, Woods, Goldin, Soo, Morrill-Labrode, Dinarello and Gorbach1991) that older (female) subjects are more susceptible to the effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA is further supported by three other studies in elderly subjects (Meydani et al. Reference Meydani, Lichtenstein, Cornwall, Meydani, Goldin, Rasmussen, Dinarello and Schaefer1993; Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001c; Bechoua et al. Reference Bechoua, Dubois, Vericel, Chapuy, Lagarde and Prigent2003) that report decreased lymphocyte proliferation associated with increased EPA and DHA intake. It would be useful to conduct a well-powered study comparing the effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA on T lymphocyte proliferation in young and older subjects.
Effects of EPA and DHA on natural killer cell activity
Four studies have examined the effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA on NK cell activity in healthy human volunteers. In all cases this variable has been measured as activity within purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Thies et al. (Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001b) have reported inhibition of NK cell activity by 1·0 g EPA+DHA/d but no effect of 0·7 g DHA/d in elderly subjects. Kelley et al. (Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson, Schmidt, Ferretti, Erickson, Yu, Chandra and Mackey1999) have reported inhibition of NK cell activity following 6 g DHA/d in young males. In contrast, Yaqoob et al. (Reference Yaqoob, Pala, Cortina-Borja, Newsholme and Calder2000) have found no effect of 3·3 g EPA+DHA/d on NK cell activity in a mixed group of healthy subjects. Moreover, a recent study (Miles et al. Reference Miles, Banerjee, Wells and Calder2006) has identified a trend toward increased NK cell activity with increased EPA and DHA consumption in young males. Taken together, the effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA on NK cell activity remain unclear and the inconsistency has only increased with this recent report. Previous suggestions that ‘high’ but not ‘low’ doses of DHA can decrease NK cell activity (Kelley et al. Reference Kelley, Taylor, Nelson, Schmidt, Ferretti, Erickson, Yu, Chandra and Mackey1999; Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001b) and that cells from older subjects might be more susceptible to the effects of EPA and DHA than those of young subjects (Calder, Reference Calder2001a) are not rejected by the recent data. Again, it would be useful to conduct a well-powered study comparing the effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA on NK cell activity in young and older subjects.
Effects of EPA and DHA on ex vivo cytokine production by T-cells
Twelve healthy volunteer studies have reported the effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA on ex vivo cytokine production by lymphocytes (Table 2). Again the most-frequent stimulus used to elicit cyokine production has been a T-cell mitogen, particularly Con A. The supplementation level in these studies ranged from 0·3 to 5·2 g EPA+DHA/d in a total of twenty-five treatment cohorts. Seven studies with a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised parallel design accounted for seventeen treatment cohorts. Most studies measured concentrations of one or more of the cytokines IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 in supernatant fractions from stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. IL-4 is a cytokine produced by Th-2-type lymphocytes, whereas IL-2 and IFN-γ are produced by Th-1-type lymphocytes (Mosmann & Sad, Reference Mosmann and Sad1996) and IL-10 is the product of regulatory T-cells.
In the lower dose ranges (<2·0 g/d) no significant effects of EPA+DHA on the production of any cytokine have been reported (Table 2). However, Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b) have found a dose-responsive increase in IFN-γ production from baseline that reached significance (P<0·05) at 2·0 g EPA+DHA/d. A non-significant trend towards increased IL-4 production was also noted in this study, and IL-4 production was found to be positively correlated with IFN-γ production. A positive correlation between the production of both cytokines and concentrations of EPA in plasma phosphatidylcholine was also reported. Miles et al. (Reference Miles, Banerjee, Wells and Calder2006) have reported significantly (P<0·05) increased IL-4 production from baseline at EPA+DHA intakes of 3·3 and 4·95 g/d (Fig. 2(c)), but these increases were not different from placebo values (Table 2). In contrast with the finding by Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b), at higher EPA+DHA intakes decreased production of IFN-γ and IL-2, another Th-1 cytokine, has been reported in some studies. Virella et al. (Reference Virella, Fourspring, Hyman, Haskill-Stroud, Long, Virella, La Via, Gross and Lopes-Virella1991) have reported decreased IL-2 production following 2·4 g EPA/d. Meydani et al. (Reference Meydani, Endres, Woods, Goldin, Soo, Morrill-Labrode, Dinarello and Gorbach1991), using a supplement of the same dose level, have found decreased IL-2 production that approaches significance (P=0·057) in older, but not young, women. Gallai et al. (Reference Gallai, Sarchielli, Trequattrini, Franceschini, Floridi, Firenze, Alberti, Di Benedetto and Stragliotto1995) have reported a decrease in PHA-induced IL-2 production as well as Con A-induced IFN-γ production following supplementation with 5·2 g EPA+DHA/d. Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b) have proposed a dose–response relationship between EPA and DHA intake and cytokine production by Th-1 type cells; increasing production at intakes of ⩽2 g/d for ⩽4 weeks and an inhibitory effect at higher intakes or after longer periods of similar intakes. On the other hand, all studies that used a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised parallel design, covering a dose range from 0·4 to 4·95 g EPA+DHA/d and seventeen dose levels, have failed to show significant effects on the production of Th-1-type cytokines (Table 2). In all but one study post supplementation IFN-γ and IL-2 concentrations were found to be similar to those in controls as well as at baseline (Yaqoob et al. Reference Yaqoob, Pala, Cortina-Borja, Newsholme and Calder2000; Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001c; Kew et al. Reference Kew, Banerjee, Minihane, Finnegan, Muggli, Albers, Williams and Calder2003, Reference Kew, Mesa, Tricon, Buckley, Minihane and Yaqoob2004; Wallace et al. Reference Wallace, Miles and Calder2003; Miles et al. Reference Miles, Banerjee, Wells and Calder2006). Miles et al. (Reference Miles, Banerjee and Calder2004a) have found a generalised and significant (P<0·05) increase in the production of all measured T lymphocyte-derived cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ) from baseline. This response was also found in the placebo group, implying a causal factor different from EPA and DHA intake. There are no studies that report significant effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA supplementation on IL-10 production. Fig. 2(a,b,c,d) indicate that the non-significant percentage changes from baseline observed in these studies were generally small and not consistent in direction. These observations suggest that the observed effects of EPA and DHA on the production of T-cell cytokines may be a result of factors that are uncorrected by the limitations of open studies. For instance, changes in outcomes reported may occur over time. The observation by Kew et al. (Reference Kew, Mesa, Tricon, Buckley, Minihane and Yaqoob2004) is noteworthy in that it shows that in the absence of effects on cytokines CD69 expression, a marker of T-cell activation, is reduced by 4·9 g DHA/d but not by 4·7 g EPA/d. This result suggests that ex vivo cytokine response to Con A may not be the most-sensitive marker of T-cell function. In addition, this result suggests that DHA may be more potent in modulating T-cell function than EPA.
In conclusion, the studies conducted so far on the effects of dietary long-chain n-3 PUFA on lymphocyte function reflected by cytokine production are highly inconsistent and therefore inconclusive. If there is any response at all, a dose level of ≥2 g EPA+DHA/d is required to significantly affect cytokine production by T-cells. The concept that supplementation of EPA might influence the Th-1 v. Th-2 balance in favour of the Th-1 phenotype via inhibition of PGE2 is not supported by the available data. Particularly, the observation of a possible concomitant dose-dependent decrease in PGE2 and an increase in IL-4 production (Trebble et al. Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003b) is in contrast with this concept. If any effect on Th cell cytokine production is real, another mechanism is more likely underlying this effect.
Effects of EPA and DHA on ex vivo cytokine production by monocytes
The largest body of evidence on immunomodulatory effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA in healthy subjects derives from studies on inflammatory cytokines. In general, these studies measured concentrations of one or more of the cytokines IL-1β, TNFα and IL-6 produced by monocytes in response to ex vivo stimulation with LPS. LPS selectively stimulates monocyte function because these cells express CD14, the LPS receptor. Studies typically used purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells, although some studies used isolated monocytes. Twenty-four studies covering a dose range from 0·3 to 6 g EPA+DHA/d in forty-six treatment cohorts were identified (Table 3). At least twenty-five cohorts in eleven studies were investigated in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised parallel study design (Table 3).
The results of the large number of studies are not fully consistent. There are no studies that report that long-chain n-3 PUFA significantly increase production of IL-1β, TNFα or IL-6 in response to ex vivo stimulation with LPS. A substantial number of studies have found decreased production of one or more inflammatory cytokine, but a larger number of studies have failed to find significant effects (Table 3). In ten of twenty-eight treatment cohorts reporting IL-6 production a significant (P<0·05) decrease was reported (Fig. 3(c)). A significant (P<0·05) decrease in IL-6 responses to LPS stimulation was found at EPA+DHA doses ranging from 0·3 to 3·4 g/d. Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003a) have reported a negative but ‘U-shaped’ dose–response relationship between long-chain n-3 PUFA intake and IL-6 production in an open uncontrolled study, with a maximum inhibition demonstrated at a supplementary intake of 1·0 g/d. Wallace et al. (Reference Wallace, Miles and Calder2003) have studied similar dose levels in a controlled blinded parallel study and have found a very similar result. On the other hand, other blinded parallel studies (Thies et al. Reference Thies, Miles, Nebe-von-Caron, Powell, Hurst, Newsholme and Calder2001a; Kew et al. Reference Kew, Banerjee, Minihane, Finnegan, Muggli, Albers, Williams and Calder2003, Reference Kew, Mesa, Tricon, Buckley, Minihane and Yaqoob2004; Rees et al. Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006) have not found decreased IL-6 production within the EPA+DHA dose range of 1–2 g/d or at higher doses. IL-1β production was found to be decreased at EPA+DHA intake levels from 1·24 g/d to 6 g/d in eight of thirty-five of the cohorts in which it was measured,. A striking similarity of these treatment cohorts is that all were part of open studies. A similar picture emerges from the studies on TNFα production; in nine of thirty-nine treatment cohorts a significant (P<0·05) decrease in LPS-induced TNFα production was reported, all were part of open studies. The EPA+DHA intake levels that were associated with inhibition of TNFα production varied from 0·3 g/d to 6 g/d. The study by Caughey et al. (Reference Caughey, Mantzioris, Gibson, Cleland and James1996) indicates a strong inverse dose–response relationship between mononuclear cell EPA content and production of IL-1β and TNFα. This earlier report was followed by several more recent reports of studies that have failed to find the same direct correlations between increased EPA concentrations in mononuclear cells and production of IL-1β and TNFα. Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Stroud, Wootton, Burdge, Miles, Ballinger, Thompson and Calder2003a) have reported a negative but ‘U-shaped’ dose–response relationship between long-chain n-3 PUFA intake and TNFα production, with a maximum inhibition demonstrated at a supplementary EPA+DHA intake of 1·0 g/d. Unfortunately, no EPA concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were reported in this study. Miles et al. (Reference Miles, Banerjee and Calder2004a) have found a dose-dependent rise in EPA concentrations in blood mononuclear cells with intake levels ⩽3 g EPA+DHA/d but with no concomitant change in IL-6 and TNFα production. Yaqoob et al. (Reference Yaqoob, Pala, Cortina-Borja, Newsholme and Calder2000) have found a fourfold rise in blood mononuclear cell EPA concentration following an intake of 3·3 g EPA+DHA/d resulting in only a small non-significant decrease in IL-6 and TNFα production by those cells. A recent study (Rees et al. Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006) that used four intake levels of ⩽4·95 g EPA+DHA/d has found a dose-dependent increase in EPA concentrations and in EPA:ARA in mononuclear cell phospholipids. This shift in eicosanoid precursors was shown to be correlated with a stepwise decline in PGE2 production by mononuclear cells stimulated with LPS and in neutrophil respiratory burst, but was not found to be correlated with changes in IL-1β and TNFα production by mononuclear cells. Fig. 3(a,b) show the percentage changes from baseline in IL-1β and TNFα production from all studies and illustrate the distribution of the significant (P<0·05) changes over the entire EPA+DHA dose range studied. The results do not confirm the presence of a dose–response relationship between long-chain n-3 PUFA intake and inhibition of IL-1β and TNFα production. The different observations made by Caughey et al. (Reference Caughey, Mantzioris, Gibson, Cleland and James1996) and in some later reports may be explained by differences in the age of study subjects, greater amounts of α-tocopherol in the capsules used in the more recent studies and differences in the precise nature of samples in which cytokine measurements were made (Calder, Reference Calder2001a), but the reason for the differences is not yet clear (Rees et al. Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006). One other factor recently identified by Grimble et al. (Reference Grimble, Howell, O'Reilly, Turner, Markovic, Hirrell, East and Calder2002) is polymorphisms in genes affecting cytokine production. These authors have shown that the effect of dietary fish oil on TNFα production by human mononuclear cells is dependent on the nature of the −308 TNFα and the +252 TNFβ polymorphisms.
In conclusion, a large body of available studies provides substantial evidence that the production of inflammatory cytokines in healthy subjects can be decreased by increasing intake of EPA+DHA. However, this evidence is not conclusive, as these reports are outnumbered by studies that find no significant effects of EPA+DHA, and the reason for this inconsistency is unclear. The proposed dose dependence of anti-inflammatory actions of long-chain n-3 PUFA is not consistently reflected in cytokine concentrations, perhaps because of low susceptibility of ex vivo cytokine production in healthy subjects to changed EPA concentrations in membrane phospholipids of monocytes and mononuclear cells. That supplemental long-chain n-3 PUFA do not increase the production of inflammatory cytokines in healthy subjects is highly consistent; no studies have reported such an increase. Thus, these findings in healthy subjects may serve as a rationale to supplement long-chain n-3 PUFA to subjects with inflammatory disorders that are (partly) caused by excessive formation of inflammatory cytokines.
Intervention studies in (chronic) inflammatory conditions and disorders
Inflammatory cytokines produced by monocytes and macrophages have an important role in the regulation of the whole-body response to infection and injury. Thus, inflammation and the inflammatory response are part of the innate immune response that is normally protective to the host. However, in some inflammatory conditions and diseases the inflammatory response occurs in an uncontrolled or inappropriate manner and causes excessive damage to the host tissues and disease can ensue. A common characteristic of these conditions and diseases is excessive or inappropriate production of inflammatory mediators, including eicosanoids and cytokines. High concentrations of TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 are particularly destructive and are implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Chronic overproduction of these cytokines can cause adipose tissue and muscle wasting and loss of bone mass and may account for alterations in body composition and tissue loss seen in inflammatory diseases and in cancer cachexia, which is a syndrome of progressive weight loss, anorexia and persistent erosion of host body cell mass in response to a malignant growth (Morley et al. Reference Morley, Thomas and Wilson2006). As well as its clear and obvious association with classic inflammatory diseases, inflammation is now recognised to play an important role in the pathology of other diseases such as CVD, HIV progression and neurodegenerative diseases of aging. Additionally, the realisation that adipose tissue is a source of inflammatory cytokines has given rise to the notion that obesity, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes have an inflammatory component (Calder, Reference Calder2006).
This section focuses on studies with long-chain n-3 PUFA in inflammatory conditions that report some of the immune markers that are most commonly studied in intervention studies in healthy volunteers rather than on disease-specific clinical outcomes (which should be considered as the most important marker of effectiveness). In addition to the immune markers reviewed in the previous section, this section reports the effects of EPA+DHA on circulating cytokines. Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines are usually below detection level in healthy subjects but are elevated in most inflammatory conditions and are an important target of intervention because of the destructive nature of their presence in the bloodstream in excessive concentrations. The concentrations found in the blood are the net outcome of production by various cells and tissues, including infiltrated monocytes and macrophages at inflamed sites, muscle and fat tissue, and removal and degradation by various cells and tissues. Their levels reflect the in vivo pro-inflammatory state (Albers et al. Reference Albers, Antoine, Bourdet-Sicard, Calder, Gleeson, Lesourd, Samartin, Sanderson, Van Loo, Vas Dias and Watzl2005) and are partly linked with ex vivo production of cytokines as they are derived in part from the same type of cells. Thus, it is expected that if supplemental EPA+DHA reduces the extent to which cells are predisposed to produce excessive levels of cytokines on receiving a stimulus ex vivo, this outcome will at least partially correlate with lower in vivo concentrations of the same cytokines in conditions in which such stimuli are present.
Complex n-3 PUFA-containing nutritional products (e.g. ‘immunonutrition’) and parenteral supplementation of EPA+DHA-enriched emulsions have been used in patients with various inflammatory conditions. However, similar to the overview in the previous section, this section is limited to studies of oral intake of pure sources of EPA+DHA. Table 4 gives an overview of the studies addressed in this section.
DB, double-blind; PC, placebo-controlled; R, randomised; ALA, α-linolenic acid (18: 3n-3); STA, stearidonic acid (18: 4n-3); GLA, γ-linolenic acid (18: 3n-6); RA, rheumatoid arthritis; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LP, lymphocyte proliferation; Con A, concanavalin A; PHA, phytohaemaglutinin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; s, soluble; IL-2R, IL-2 receptor; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; TNFR, TNF receptor; ↓, reduction; ↑, increase.
* The effect is shown if it was significant (P<0·05).
Cancer cachexia is a major factor contributing to the weakening of the already compromised immune system of patients with cancer. Cancer cachexia affects approximately 30% of patients with cancer, thus accounting for >400 000 patients in the USA alone (Morley et al. Reference Morley, Thomas and Wilson2006). A current belief is that the mechanism underlying cancer cachexia involves the host's production of certain cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα (Todorov et al. Reference Todorov, Cariuk, McDevitt, Coles, Fearon and Tisdale1996). As increased production of these cytokines may play a major role in weight loss, an important clinical question with fish oil intervention is therefore whether treatment strategies based on anti-cachexia treatment might reduce cachexia and thereby improve immune function, life expectancy and life quality. Indeed, the findings of a recent large study (Fearon et al. Reference Fearon, Barber, Moses, Ahmedzai, Taylor, Tisdale and Murray2006) suggest that supplementation with EPA in cancer cachexia results in weight gain compared with placebo, particularly in gastrointestinal cancer.
The first study to report effects of fish oil supplementation on immune markers in cancer cachexia (Wigmore et al. Reference Wigmore, Fearon, Maingay and Ross1997) has examined the effect of an intake level increasing from 1 g EPA/d to 6 g EPA/d during a 4-week intervention in patients with pancreatic cancer. After 4 weeks of supplementation with EPA the production of IL-6 by blood mononuclear cells was found to be significantly (P<0·05) decreased compared with levels seen for healthy controls, but no significant effect on serum IL-6 concentration was found. The supernatant fraction of the stimulated mononuclear cells following EPA supplementation was shown to reduce the potential of isolated human hepatocytes to produce C-reactive protein. Indeed, serum levels of C-reactive protein were found to be decreased after EPA supplementation, indicating that EPA can down regulate the acute-phase response in cancer cachexia, most likely via suppression of IL-6 production. Gogos et al. (Reference Gogos, Ginopoulos, Salsa, Apostolidou, Zoumbos and Kalfarentzos1998) have failed to find effects of supplementation of 5·1 g EPA+DHA/d for 6 weeks on serum TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1 levels and on ex vivo IL-1 and IL-6 production by blood mononuclear cells. However, in the malnourished subpopulation with decreased TNFα production, ex vivo TNFα production by mononuclear cells was shown to be restored to a normal level following n-3 PUFA supplementation. In this study survival was prolonged in the patients receiving the n-3 PUFA supplement. Furukawa et al. (Reference Furukawa, Tashiro, Yamamori, Takagi, Morishima and Sugiura1999) have studied the effect of an oral supplement providing 1·8 g EPA/d to patients with oesophageal cancer post surgery who were also receiving parenteral soyabean oil. The EPA intervention was started on day 7 before surgery and was continued until post-operative day 21. The authors have reported that serum IL-6 is significantly lower (P<0·05) on post-operative day 7 and lymphocyte proliferation and NK cell activity are significantly higher (P<0·05) on post-operative day 21. Similar data have been presented by the same authors in a research letter (Takagi et al. Reference Takagi, Yamamori, Furukawa, Miyazaki and Tashiro2001) and a symposium report (Tashiro et al. Reference Tashiro, Yamamori, Takagi, Hayashi, Furukawa and Nakajima1998), so these data are likely to derive from the same study. Finally, a very high intake of fish oil (8·1 g EPA+DHA/d) for 4 weeks has been studied in gastrointestinal cancer cachexia (Persson et al. Reference Persson, Glimelius, Ronnelid and Nygren2005). Although fish oil supplementation was shown to result in weight stabilisation, particularly when combined with melatonin treatment, no effects on circulating TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6 or IL-8 concentrations were observed.
Thus, these studies indicate that the production of IL-6 in these populations, either measured after ex vivo stimulation of mononuclear cells or in plasma, is decreased or not affected by EPA (and DHA) supplementation. Similar results have been reported in studies with EPA-enriched enteral nutrition (Barber et al. Reference Barber, Fearon, Tisdale, McMillan and Ross2001). The reported increase in ex vivo TNFα production by mononuclear cells, lymphocyte proliferation and NK activity in some studies may reflect a (partial) immune restoration by n-3 PUFA supplementation.
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are chronic inflammatory diseases of the alimentary tract. In ulcerative colitis the mucosa of the colon is mainly affected, while in Crohn's disease any part of the alimentary tract from the mouth to the anus can be affected, although it is usually the ileum and colon. In both diseases the intestinal mucosa contains elevated levels of inflammatory eicosanoids such as LTB4 (Sharon & Stenson, Reference Sharon and Stenson1984) and cytokines. In particular, the activation of IL-2- and IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells in the lamina propria of the Crohn's disease-affected gut plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis (Hommes & van Deventer, Reference Hommes and van Deventer2000).
At least twelve placebo-controlled studies using long-chain n-3 PUFA in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases are now available and are reviewed elsewhere (Calder, Reference Calder2006). Only two of these studies have reported effects on cytokine production. The earliest study (Almallah et al. Reference Almallah, Richardson, O'Hanrahan, Mowat, Brunt, Sinclair, Ewen, Heys and Eremin1998, 2000a,b) has reported a significant reduction (P<0·05) in serum IL-2 and soluble IL-2 receptor levels following 26 weeks of supplementation with 5·6 g EPA+DHA/d in patients with ulcerative colitis. This change was found to be accompanied by significant reductions (P<0·05) in serum LTB4 concentration, NK cell activity and sigmoidoscopic and histological scores, and decreased disease activity. More recently, Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Wootton, Calder, Mullee, Fine and Stroud2004) have shown that 2·7 g EPA+DHA/d for 24 weeks reduces the ex vivo production of IFN-γ and PGE2, but not TNFα, by stimulated mononuclear cells from patients with Crohn's disease. These data indicate that n-3 PUFA may decrease disease-related inflammatory markers in inflammatory bowel diseases.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by joint inflammation that manifests as swelling, pain, functional impairment, morning stiffness, osteoporosis and muscle wasting. Joint lesions are characterised by infiltration of activated macrophages, T lymphocytes and plasma cells into the synovium (the tissue lining the joints) and by proliferation of synovial cells termed synoviocytes. Synovial biopsies from patients with rheumatoid arthritis contain high levels of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and granulocyte–macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, and synovial cells cultured ex vivo produce TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and granulocyte–macrophage-colony-stimulating factor for extended periods of time without additional stimulus (Feldmann & Maini, Reference Feldmann and Maini1999). Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is increased in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and in the joint tissues in rat models of arthritis (Sano et al. Reference Sano, Hla, Maier, Crofford, Case, Maciag and Wilder1992). PGE2, LTB4, 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid and also platelet-activating factor are found in the synovial fluid of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (Sperling, Reference Sperling1995). The efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis indicates the importance of pro-inflammatory cyclooxygenase pathway products in the pathophysiology of the disease. Thus, these data provide a mechanistic basis for benefits of fish oil supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis.
At least seventeen placebo-controlled studies have investigated the effect of n-3 PUFA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (for review, see Calder, Reference Calder2006). Five of these studies have reported effects on inflammatory cytokines (Table 4). Kremer et al. (Reference Kremer, Lawrence, Jubiz, DiGiacomo, Rynes, Bartholomew and Sherman1990) have found no effects of either 2·9 g EPA+DHA/d or 5·9 g EPA+DHA/d on Con A-induced IL-2 production and Con A- or PHA-induced lymphocyte proliferation. LPS-induced IL-1 production by monocytes was reported to be significantly decreased (P<0·05) by 5·9 g EPA+DHA/d but not by 2·9 g EPA+DHA/d in the same study. Espersen et al. (Reference Espersen, Grunnet, Lervang, Nielsen, Thomsen, Faarvang, Dyerberg and Ernst1992) and Kremer et al. (Reference Kremer, Lawrence, Petrillo, Litts, Mullaly and Rynes1995) have reported decreased serum IL-1β following 3·2 and 7·1 g EPA+DHA/d respectively. No effect of fish oil supplementation on serum TNFα was found following 3·2 (Espersen et al. Reference Espersen, Grunnet, Lervang, Nielsen, Thomsen, Faarvang, Dyerberg and Ernst1992), 3·4 (Sundrarjun et al. Reference Sundrarjun, Komindr, Archararit, Dahlan, Puchaiwatananon, Angthararak, Udomsuppayakul and Chuncharunee2004), 4·2 (Adam et al. Reference Adam, Beringer, Kless, Lemmen, Adam, Wiseman, Adam, Klimmek and Forth2003) or 7·1 (Kremer et al. Reference Kremer, Lawrence, Petrillo, Litts, Mullaly and Rynes1995) g EPA+DHA/d. However, decreased soluble TNFα receptor levels were found (Sundrarjun et al. Reference Sundrarjun, Komindr, Archararit, Dahlan, Puchaiwatananon, Angthararak, Udomsuppayakul and Chuncharunee2004) after 12 weeks of supplementation with 3·4 g EPA+DHA/d. Serum IL-6 levels were unchanged in the same study (Sundrarjun et al. Reference Sundrarjun, Komindr, Archararit, Dahlan, Puchaiwatananon, Angthararak, Udomsuppayakul and Chuncharunee2004) and following 7·1 g EPA+DHA/d (Kremer et al. Reference Kremer, Lawrence, Petrillo, Litts, Mullaly and Rynes1995). In addition, no effects on serum IL-8 and IL-2 concentrations were found following fish oil supplementation in the latter study.
These studies indicate that fish oil may decrease IL-1 production in rheumatoid arthritis and that it has little effect on other cytokines. However, in four of these studies fish oil was found to improve clinical outcomes (Calder, Reference Calder2006). Indeed, in almost all published trials of fish oil intervention in rheumatoid arthritis clinical benefits have been reported (Calder, Reference Calder2006). These data therefore suggest that disease-specific clinical outcomes might be a more sensitive marker of anti-inflammatory effects of EPA+DHA than inflammatory cytokines.
COPD is characterised by reduced airflow on expiration as a result of airway obstruction. COPD is currently the fifth leading cause of death worldwide, and in the next decades its prevalence and mortality rates are expected to increase (Murray & Lopez, Reference Murray and Lopez1997). COPD is characterised by chronic inflammation in the small airways and lung parenchyma accompanied by infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages (Barnes et al. Reference Barnes, Shapiro and Pauwels2003). This inflammation is considered to mediate excess mucous production, fibrosis and proteolysis via neutrophil recruitment. The most important neutrophil chemotactic factors implicated in COPD are IL-8, TNFα and LTB4 (Barnes, Reference Barnes2000). Airflow obstruction and a chronic persistent inflammatory process also characterise asthma, but the nature of the inflammation differs markedly from that in COPD. The inflammation in asthma is predominantly eosinophilic and the most important cytokines involved are IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 (Barnes, Reference Barnes2000). Control of inflammatory mediators is an important aspect in the treatment strategy of both inflammatory lung diseases.
Two recent studies (Broekhuizen et al. Reference Broekhuizen, Wouters, Creutzberg, Weling-Scheepers and Schols2005; Matsuyama et al. Reference Matsuyama, Mitsuyama, Watanabe, Oonakahara, Higashimoto, Osame and Arimura2005) have investigated the effects of relatively-low supplemental intake of EPA+DHA on inflammatory markers, as well as exercise capacity, in COPD. Broekhuizen et al. (Reference Broekhuizen, Wouters, Creutzberg, Weling-Scheepers and Schols2005) have reported improved exercise capacity in a cycling test but no effect on systemic levels of IL-6 and TNFα following intake of a supplement containing 1·0 g EPA+DHA/d. Matsuyama et al. (Reference Matsuyama, Mitsuyama, Watanabe, Oonakahara, Higashimoto, Osame and Arimura2005) have measured both systemic (serum) and sputum TNFα and IL-8 levels in a 2-year intervention with a supplemental intake of 0·6 g EPA+DHA/d. Notably, although no differences in serum cytokine concentrations were found in this study, decreased sputum TNFα and IL-8 levels were observed in the group receiving n-3 PUFA, accompanied by improved exercise capacity in a walk test. The only comparable study of asthma has reported the effects of a high level of fish oil (5·2 g EPA+DHA/d) on sputum inflammatory cytokines and pulmonary function in exercise-induced broncho-constriction (Mickleborough et al. Reference Mickleborough, Lindley, Ionescu and Fly2006). Concentrations of TNFα and IL-1β in the sputum supernatant fraction were found to be significantly lower (P<0·05) in the fish oil group and this change was accompanied by improved pulmonary function.
In conclusion, these studies indicate that EPA+DHA supplementation in inflammatory lung diseases results in a local rather than a systemic decrease in inflammatory cytokines, even at relatively low intake levels. As these local effects are associated with improved clinical outcomes, cytokine concentrations in inflamed tissue might be a more sensitive marker and predictor of anti-inflammatory efficacy of EPA+DHA supplementation than systemic cytokines.
HIV infection and AIDS
Generally, HIV infection and disease progression is not considered to be predominantly an inflammatory disease. Gradual depletion of T lymphocytes is considered to be the most distinct and important immunological feature of HIV disease progression. However, there is substantial evidence to indicate that HIV disease progression is also associated with persistent presence of (subclinical) inflammation, particularly in the intestinal mucosa. It is uncertain whether a mucosal inflammatory response in the intestine is a result of either HIV infection or altered enterocyte function and activity. It is clear, however, that during the progression of the disease there are distinct kinetics of production of local pro-inflammatory cytokines (McGowan et al. Reference McGowan, Radford-Smith and Jewell1994, Reference McGowan, Elliott, Fuerst, Taing, Boscardin, Poles and Anton2004; Reka et al. Reference Reka, Garro and Kotler1994; Sharpstone et al. Reference Sharpstone, Rowbottom, Nelson, Lepper and Gazzard1996). There is elevation of TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 in particular and to a lesser extent IFN-γ in intestinal biopsies from patients infected with HIV. The kinetics of the production of these cytokines and the increased local tissue levels strongly depend on the stage of disease, i.e. TNFα and IL-1β increase during the progression of disease. It has been shown in models of intestinal barrier function that pro-inflammatory cytokines can have strong detrimental effects on intestinal barrier disruption by increasing paracellular permeability (McKay & Baird, Reference McKay and Baird1999; Nusrat et al. Reference Nusrat, Turner and Madara2000). Disruption of intestinal barrier integrity, as determined by increased epithelial permeability, has also been reported in patients infected with HIV. This barrier disruption seems to worsen during the course of disease (Lima et al. Reference Lima, Silva, Gifoni, Barrett, McAuliffe, Bao, Fox, Fedorko and Guerrant1997). It has therefore been hypothesised that the underlying mechanism most likely involves pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IFN-γ and IL-1β (Stockmann et al. Reference Stockmann, Schmitz, Fromm, Schmidt, Rokos, Pauli, Scholz, Riecken and Schulzke1998, Reference Stockmann, Schmitz, Fromm, Schmidt, Pauli, Scholz, Riecken and Schulzke2000; Schmitz et al. Reference Schmitz, Rokos, Florian, Gitter, Fromm, Scholz, Ullrich, Zeitz, Pauli and Schulzke2002). A more-widely-acknowledged aspect of the pro-inflammatory response during HIV infection is the AIDS-related wasting syndrome. It has been estimated that in the USA 35% of patients with AIDS are cachectic (Morley et al. Reference Morley, Thomas and Wilson2006). Elaboration of pro-inflammatory cytokines is probably the major factor responsible for AIDS wasting (Morley et al. Reference Morley, Thomas and Wilson2006). Studies investigating the effects of fish oil supplementation on cytokine concentrations and responses in patients who were HIV positive were conducted against the background of potential benefits on lean body mass.
Three relatively-small studies (n 9–16; Bell et al. Reference Bell, Chavali, Bistrian, Connolly, Utsunomiya and Forse1996; Hellerstein et al. Reference Hellerstein, Wu, McGrath, Faix, George, Shackleton, Horn, Hoh and Neese1996; Virgili et al. Reference Virgili, Farriol, Castellanos, Giro and Podzamczer1997) have investigated the effects of fish oil supplementation on cytokine concentrations and responses in patients who were HIV positive. Virgili et al. (Reference Virgili, Farriol, Castellanos, Giro and Podzamczer1997) have reported decreased LPS-induced IL-1β production following 1·8 g EPA+DHA/d for 6 weeks. On the other hand, Bell et al. (Reference Bell, Chavali, Bistrian, Connolly, Utsunomiya and Forse1996) have reported increased LPS-induced IL-6 production and no effect on TNFα production after 2·0 g EPA+DHA/d for 6 weeks. Finally, Hellerstein et al. (Reference Hellerstein, Wu, McGrath, Faix, George, Shackleton, Horn, Hoh and Neese1996) have reported no effects of 4·5 g EPA+DHA/d on serum TNFα, IL-1β and IFN-γ concentrations, LPS- and PHA-induced production of TNFα and IL-1β or weight loss in a study of patients with AIDS-associated weight loss. None of these studies have reported significant effects of n-3 PUFA on T-cell counts.
In conclusion, as a fish oil-rich supplement has no adverse effect on T-cell counts in these or other studies of individuals infected with HIV or positive for AIDS (Pichard et al. Reference Pichard, Sudre, Karsegard, Yerly, Slosman, Delley, Perrin and Hirschel1998; de Luis Roman et al. Reference de Luis Roman, Bachiller, Izaola, Romero, Martin, Arranz, Eiros Bouza and Aller2001; Keithley et al. Reference Keithley, Swanson, Zeller, Sha, Cohen, Hershow and Novak2002), this intervention appears to be safe in HIV infection and AIDS. Although there appears to be no consistent effect of fish oil supplementation on systemic cytokine production in patients infected with HIV or positive for AIDS, to date there are no data available on the effect of EPA+DHA enrichment on local markers of inflammation in the intestinal mucosa. It would therefore be useful to investigate the effects of EPA+DHA on mucosal inflammation and intestinal barrier integrity in patients infected with HIV, as such an approach might be more likely to reveal potential clinically-relevant benefits of EPA+DHA supplementation to these patients.
Obese individuals are at increased risk for a range of metabolic diseases, including insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Adipose tissue is an important endocrine organ, secreting a range of inflammatory mediators, including TNFα and IL-6. Circulating concentrations of these cytokines are increased in obesity and may contribute to the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases (Browning, Reference Browning2003). Hence, obesity is considered as a low-grade chronic inflammatory state.
Two studies (Chan et al. Reference Chan, Watts, Barrett, Beilin and Mori2002; Jellema et al. Reference Jellema, Plat and Mensink2004) have investigated the effects of supplementation with fish oil (providing either 1·1 (Jellema et al. Reference Jellema, Plat and Mensink2004) or 3·4 (Chan et al. Reference Chan, Watts, Barrett, Beilin and Mori2002) g EPA+DHA/d) for 6 weeks on serum TNFα and IL-6 concentrations in obese men. Fish oil supplementation was not found to significantly affect the concentrations of circulating cytokines in either study. Hence, these studies do not provide evidence that EPA+DHA supplementation has favourable effects on markers for the low-grade inflammatory state in obesity.
Inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in the inflammatory processes leading to the destruction of the Islets of Langerhans in type 1 diabetes (Mandrup-Poulsen et al. Reference Mandrup-Poulsen, Helqvist, Molvig, Wogensen and Nerup1989). In addition, prospective epidemiological studies have found that patients with type 2 diabetes have increased levels of inflammatory markers such as ARA-derived F2-isoprostanes (Gopaul et al. Reference Gopaul, Anggard, Mallet, Betteridge, Wolff and Nourooz-Zadeh1995), IL-6 (Pradhan et al. Reference Pradhan, Manson, Rifai, Buring and Ridker2001), TNFα (Nilsson et al. Reference Nilsson, Jovinge, Niemann, Reneland and Lithell1998) and C-reactive protein (Pradhan et al. Reference Pradhan, Manson, Rifai, Buring and Ridker2001). It has been suggested that elevated levels of these markers are associated with increased oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes (Mori et al. Reference Mori, Woodman, Burke, Puddey, Croft and Beilin2003). Hence, both insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes are considered to be disorders with an inflammatory component.
Molvig et al. (Reference Molvig, Pociot, Worsaae, Wogensen, Baek and Christensen1991) have studied the effects of 3·2 g EPA+DHA/d in a small cohort of men with type 1 diabetes parallel to an age-matched cohort of healthy men. As in the healthy subjects, no effect on LPS-induced TNFα and IL-1β production was found but PHA-induced lymphocyte proliferation was found to be decreased by 50% in the patients with diabetes. Mori et al. (Reference Mori, Woodman, Burke, Puddey, Croft and Beilin2003) have studied the effects of a supplemental intake of either 3·8 g purified EPA/d or 3·7 g purified DHA/d on serum IL-6 and TNFα concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes who were hypertensive. Although no statistically significant effects on serum IL-6 and TNFα were found, TNFα concentrations tended to be lower after 6 weeks of treatment with either EPA or DHA compared with baseline levels. Post-intervention TNFα concentrations were 20% lower in the group receiving EPA and 33% lower in the group receiving DHA.
Other inflammatory conditions
In addition to the inflammatory disorders addressed previously, the effects of EPA+DHA on the selected immune markers in psoriasis, chronic renal disease and multiple sclerosis have been investigated in only one study for each of these disorders. Soyland et al. (Reference Soyland, Lea, Sandstad and Drevon1994) have found no effects on PHA-induced lymphocyte proliferation or IL-2, IL-6 and TNFα production following treatment with 5·0 g EPA+DHA/d for 16 weeks in patients with psoriasis. Cappelli et al. (Reference Cappelli, Di Liberato, Stuard, Ballone and Albertazzi1997) have reported decreased PHA-induced TNFα production but no effects on PHA-induced IL-1β and IL-2 production in patients with chronic progressive renal disease following treatment with 2·9 g EPA+DHA/d for 1 year. Gallai et al. (Reference Gallai, Sarchielli, Trequattrini, Franceschini, Floridi, Firenze, Alberti, Di Benedetto and Stragliotto1995) have studied the effects of 5·2 g EPA+DHA/d for 26 weeks in healthy subjects (for details, see Tables 2 and 3) and patients with multiple sclerosis and have reported decreased PHA-induced IL-2 production, decreased Con A-induced IFN-γ production and decreased LPS-induced TNFα and IL-1β production in the patients with multiple sclerosis. These effects were similar to those for the healthy subjects in this study.
Discussion and conclusions
Dietary supplementation with long-chain n-3 PUFA from fish oil (EPA and DHA) increases the proportion of these fatty acids in immune cells and changes the production of important mediators and regulators of inflammation and immune responses, such as PG, LT and resolvins, towards a more anti-inflammatory profile. The incorporation of EPA and DHA into human inflammatory cells (Healy et al. Reference Healy, Wallace, Miles, Calder and Newsholm2000) and the decreased production of pro-inflammatory PGE2 occur in a dose-dependent fashion (Rees et al. Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006). Furthermore, an inverse relationship between mononuclear cell EPA content and the production of TNFα and IL-1β by these cells has been reported (Caughey et al. Reference Caughey, Mantzioris, Gibson, Cleland and James1996). These observations suggest that the effects of EPA and DHA on inflammation and markers of immune function might be dose-dependent. The study by Rees et al. (Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006) suggests that the threshold value of such an effect may be between 1·65 g EPA+DHA/d and 3·3 g EPA+DHA/d, at least in healthy volunteers, as decreased PGE2 production was found at 3·3 g/d, with a larger decrease at 4·95 g/d, but no significant effect at 1·65 g/d.
Overall, the current data from supplementation studies in healthy subjects fail to reveal a threshold value for, and dose–response effects on, immunomodulation with EPA+DHA. First, there is no clear trend that intervention cohorts with decreased inflammatory cytokine and lymphocyte proliferation responses are found more often in the upper range of intake. Second, there are no clear indications that the percentage decrease in cytokine production and lymphocyte proliferation following EPA+DHA supplementation is higher in the higher dose range. Third, most studies in healthy subjects, particularly those with the best-quality design (double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised and parallel), have not found effects of EPA and DHA on cytokine production and lymphocyte proliferation. The latter observation particularly indicates that healthy subjects are relatively insensitive to modulation of the cell and cytokine response with long-chain n-3 PUFA, even at intake levels that raise EPA concentration in mononuclear cell phospholipids from approximately 0·6% total fatty acids to 4·1% total fatty acids (Rees et al. Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006). Rees et al. (Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006) have observed that older subjects incorporate EPA more readily than younger subjects, and that older subjects are more sensitive to the immunological effects of EPA. This observation is consistent with differences in lymphocyte proliferation responsiveness between older and young subjects (see p. 240). In addition, based on direct comparison of young and older subjects there is some evidence to suggest that older women are more sensitive to the ability of long-chain n-3 PUFA to decrease production of inflammatory cytokines (Meydani et al. Reference Meydani, Endres, Woods, Goldin, Soo, Morrill-Labrode, Dinarello and Gorbach1991), but this finding is not confirmed in a study comparing young and older males (Rees et al. Reference Rees, Miles, Banerjee, Wells, Roynette, Wahle and Calder2006), and there is no evidence to suggest that older subjects are more sensitive to modulation of T-cell cytokine responses than younger subjects. Taken together, there is no conclusive evidence that the immunomodulatory effects of EPA+DHA in healthy subjects are dose dependent, which may be related to the apparent low sensitivity of healthy subjects to such modulation.
The data summarised in Table 4 show that inflammatory cytokine concentrations or production are influenced by fish oil in a relatively large number of studies conducted in patients with inflammatory conditions. This observation suggests that patients with an inflammatory condition might be more sensitive to the immunomodulatory effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA than healthy subjects. This difference could potentially be related to depletion of the buffering capacity present in healthy subjects, e.g. as a result of a higher turnover rate of immune cells in disease and of the fatty acids in immune cell phospholipids for use as substrate for eicosanoid synthesis or as ligands for transcription factors. In addition, some studies, particularly those in patients with COPD, indicate that local effects at the site of inflammation might be more pronounced than systemic effects (for references, see Table 4). In addition, the Trebble et al. (Reference Trebble, Arden, Wootton, Calder, Mullee, Fine and Stroud2004) study of Crohn's disease indicates that disease-related T-cell markers might be more sensitive to immunomodulation by fish oil than the same T-cell markers in healthy subjects. The presence of inflamed tissue or ‘sensitised’ immune cells in inflammatory disorders and the absence of these factors in healthy subjects might (partially) explain the differential immunomodulation seen. As the designs and experimental conditions used differ between studies it is not possible to thoroughly investigate the potential presence of dose–response effects. The limited data that allow direct comparison within the same inflammatory disorder provide no clear indication of a dose–response effect of EPA+DHA supplementation on immune markers. Importantly, in a substantial number of these studies clinical benefits related to the inflammatory state of the condition were observed in the absence of significant effects on immune markers of inflammation. This observation indicates that EPA+DHA might exert anti-inflammatory effects without revealing these effects if only certain immune markers are considered. This possibility implies that condition-specific clinical end points such as joint tenderness and morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis or exercise performance in COPD might be more sensitive markers of modulation by EPA+DHA than cytokines. Taken together, the observations indicate that studies in healthy subjects are a useful tool to describe the general principles of immunomodulation by n-3 PUFA, as in general the direction of immunomodulation in healthy subjects (if any) and in inflammatory conditions is the same. However, the extent of the effect might be very different in inflammatory conditions, indicating that studies in healthy subjects are not very appropriate for establishing dose levels for specific applications in inflammatory conditions. In some specific situations, such as in immune suppression induced by malnourishment (Gogos et al. Reference Gogos, Ginopoulos, Salsa, Apostolidou, Zoumbos and Kalfarentzos1998) or surgery (stress; Furukawa et al. Reference Furukawa, Tashiro, Yamamori, Takagi, Morishima and Sugiura1999) in patients with cancer the direction of the modulation might be opposite to that seen in healthy subjects and in patients with a chronic inflammatory disorder. Also, it is possible that in such conditions EPA+DHA contribute to a normalisation of the immune response.
Traditionally, EPA rather than DHA has been considered as the most important and potent immunomodulatory n-3 PUFA, as its mechanistic basis of being an alternative substrate for eicosanoid synthesis is well described. More recently, DHA-derived mediators D-series resolvins, docosatrienes and neuroprotectins, also produced by cyclooxygenase-2 and lipoxygenase under some conditions, have been identified that also appear to be anti-inflammatory and inflammation resolving (Hong et al. Reference Hong, Gronert, Devchand, Moussignac and Serhan2003; Marcheselli et al. Reference Marcheselli, Hong, Lukiw, Tian, Gronert, Musto, Hardy, Gimenez, Chiang, Serhan and Bazan2003; Mukherjee et al. Reference Mukherjee, Marcheselli, Serhan and Bazan2004). Only two studies in the current overview provide direct comparison of the effects of EPA and DHA. The first study (Kew et al. Reference Kew, Mesa, Tricon, Buckley, Minihane and Yaqoob2004) has shown that a similarly high intake of either EPA or DHA has no effect on cytokine production but that only DHA reduces CD69 expression, a marker of T-cell activation, in healthy subjects. The second study (Mori et al. Reference Mori, Woodman, Burke, Puddey, Croft and Beilin2003) has shown that serum TNFα concentrations are at least equally affected by DHA intake compared with EPA intake in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Conclusive evidence of the relative contribution of EPA and DHA is still lacking but these observations, together with the mechanistic understanding of DHA-based effects that is now available, may change the traditional view of the relative contributions of EPA and DHA.
The importance of the dampening effect of EPA+DHA on some markers of immune function in relation to the immune response in general and disease resistance is not well described. The observations in some studies that EPA+DHA decrease cytokine and lymphocyte proliferation responses may lead to the conclusion that EPA+DHA are immunosuppressive and therefore disadvantageous to the host's immune function and disease resistance. However, there are no data to suggest that either supplementation with fish oil or high background intakes of EPA+DHA (e.g. in the Japanese, Greenland Inuit, Norwegian or Icelandic populations) increase susceptibility to infectious diseases. The immunomodulatory effects observed in some studies with healthy subjects might equally well reflect a correction towards normalised, less exaggerated, responses, indicating a more balanced and effective immune response. The later hypothesis is supported by a few observations. The findings of a large study on the risk of community-acquired pneumonia and fatty acid intake (Merchant et al. Reference Merchant, Curhan, Rimm, Willett and Fawzi2005) indicate that pneumonia risk is reduced by 31% for every 1 g/d increase in intake of α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3) and by 4% for every 1 g/d increase in linoleic acid intake. In this study linoleic and α-linolenic acids were derived from common food sources, so their effects could not be separated. α-Linolenic acid has a much larger effect than linoleic acid and increased α-linolenic acid intake increases EPA levels in immune cells (Burdge & Calder, Reference Burdge and Calder2005). Thus, increased EPA levels in immune cells might explain this observation. Moreover, among subjects with low n-6 and n-3 fatty acid intakes from plant sources, high fish intake is associated with reduced pneumonia risk (Merchant et al. Reference Merchant, Curhan, Rimm, Willett and Fawzi2005). Second, observations associated with an epidemic of measles in Greenland in 1951, triggered by an infected Danish sailor, support this view. The epidemic in this naïve population shows the same characteristics (e.g. expected numbers of cases, complications) as previous epidemics recorded in other naïve populations elsewhere in the world (Kronborg et al. Reference Kronborg, Hansen and Aaby1992). As this naïve Inuit population in Greenland traditionally consume a long-chain n-3 PUFA-rich diet, these observations suggests that these fatty acids do not worsen the response to the virus (Calder, Reference Calder2001b). Third, evidence from clinical trials of patients with trauma and cancer who were hospitalised (Heyland et al. Reference Heyland, Novak, Drover, Jain, Su and Suchner2001) suggests that EPA+DHA-enriched ‘immunonutrition’ may decrease, not increase, infectious complication rates. However, because of the combination of nutrients such as arginine, nucleotides and long-chain n-3 PUFA in the enteral formulas used in these studies, it is not possible to discern how much of the reported effects are attributable to n-3 PUFA. Thus, these limited data support the view that high EPA+DHA consumption does not impair immune function and may be beneficial for infectious disease resistance. For conclusive statements on this issue, well-powered supplementation studies designed to identify effects of EPA+DHA on infection rates are required.
In conclusion, the current review provides no evidence for strong dose-dependent immunomodulatory effects of EPA+DHA in healthy subjects. The apparent absence of dose-dependent effects might be a result of the relative insensitivity of healthy subjects to such modulation. The presence of an inflammatory condition might increase the sensitivity to the immunomodulatory effects of EPA+DHA. In addition, there is substantial evidence to suggest that some condition-specific clinical end points are more sensitive markers to these effects than immune markers. Studies in healthy subject are a useful tool for investigating the general principles of EPA+DHA modulation, rather than for determining the dose required in specific inflammatory conditions. The concern that the potential immunosuppressive effects of EPA+DHA might impair immune function or infectious disease resistance is not supported by the studies considered here. Indeed, in some conditions the immunomodulatory effects of EPA+DHA might improve immune function and disease resistance.