Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-fv4mn Total loading time: 0.43 Render date: 2022-06-25T21:13:35.933Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

High-meat diets and cancer risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Sheila A. Bingham*
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Dunn Nutrition Unit, Cambridge CB2 2DH, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Sheila A. Bingham, fax +44 (0)1223 413763, email Sheila.Bingham@mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Up to 80 % of breast, bowel and prostate cancers are attributed to dietary practices, and international comparisons show strong positive associations with meat consumption. Estimates of relative risk obtained from cohort investigations are in the same direction, although generally weak, and red and processed meats rather than white meat seem to be associated with elevated risk of colon cancer. In breast cancer, there are consistent associations with total meat intake and there is evidence of a dose response. Despite these associations with meat, existing studies suggest that vegetarians do not have reduced risk of breast, bowel or prostate cancer, but there are no quantitative estimates of amounts of meat consumed by meat eaters in these cohort studies. Possible mecha-nisms underlying epidemiological associations include the formation of heterocyclic amines in meat when it is cooked. These heterocyclic amines require acetylation by P450 enzymes, and individuals with the fast-acetylating genotype who eat high amounts of meat may be at increased risk of large-bowel cancer. NH3 and N-nitroso compounds (NOC) formed from residues by bacteria in the large bowel are probably also important. NH3 is a promotor of large-bowel tumours chemically induced by NOC, and some of the chromosomal mutations found in human colo-rectal cancer are consistent with effects of NOC and heterocyclic amines. However, the type, amount, and cooking method of meat or protein associated with increased risk are not certain. The effects of high levels of meat on NH3 and NOC output are not reduced by increasing the amount of fermenta-ble carbohydrate in the diet, but interaction between meat, NSP and vegetable intakes on the risk of cancer has not been studied comprehensively. The interaction between dietary low-penetrance genetic polymorphic and somatic mutation factors has also been investigated to a limited extent. Current Department of Health (1998) recommendations are that meat consumption should not rise, and that consumers at the top end of the distribution should consider a reduction in intakes.

Type
Meat or wheat for the next millennium? Plenary Lecture
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1999

References

Allison, C & Macfarlane, GT (1988) Effect of nitrate on methane production and fermentation in slurries of human faecal bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 134, 13971405.Google ScholarPubMed
Angaard, E (1994) Nitric oxide: mediator, murderer and medicine. Lancet 343, 11991206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, MC, Saul, RL, Lyang-Ja, L & Bruce, WB (1981) Analysis of nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamines in human faeces. In Banbury Report no. 7. Gastrointestinal Cancer, pp. 321327 [Bruce, WR, Correa, P, Lipkin, M, Tannenbaum, S and Wilkins, TD, editors]. Cold Harbor Spring, NY: Cold Harbor Spring Laboratory.Google Scholar
Armstrong, B & Doll, R (1975) Environmental factors and cancer incidence in different countries. International Journal of Cancer 15, 617631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, L & Ross, RK (1993) Endogenous hormones and breast cancer risk. Epidemiologic Reviews 15, 4865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bingham, SA & Day, NE (1997) Use of biomarkers to validate dietary assessments and the effect of energy adjustment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, 1130S1137S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, SA, Pignatelli, B, Pollock, J, Ellul, A, Mallaveille, C, Gross, G, Runswick, S, Cummings, JH & O'Neill, IK (1996) Does increased formation of endogenous N nitroso compounds in the human colon explain the association between red meat and colon cancer? Carcinogenesis 17, 515523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodmer, WF, Bailey, CJ, Bodmer, J, Bussey, HJR, Ellis, A, Gorman, P, Lucibello, FC, Murday, VA, Rider, SH, Scambler, P, Sheer, D, Solomon, E & Spurr, NK (1987) Localisation of the gene for FAP on chromosome 5. Nature 328, 614616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, JL (1989) ras Oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Research 49, 46824689.Google ScholarPubMed
Burkitt, DP (1969) Related disease-related cause? Lancet ii, 12291231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmels, S, Oshima, H, Vincent, P, Gounot, A & Bartsch, H (1985) Screening of micro-organisms for nitrosation catalysis at pH 7. Carcinogenesis 6, 911915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canzain, F, Ushijama, T, Serikawa, T, Wakabayashi, K, Sugimura, T & Nagao, M (1994) Instability of microsatellites in rat colon tumours induced by HAA. Cancer Research 54, 63156317.Google Scholar
Clinton, SK, Bostwick, DG, Olson, LM, Mangian, HJ & Visek, WJ (1988) Effects of ammonium acetate and sodium cholate on N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced colon carcinogenesis of rats. Cancer Research 48, 30353039.Google ScholarPubMed
Coleman, MP, Esteve, J, Damieki, P, Arslan, A & Renard, H (1993) Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality. IARC Scientific Publication no. 121. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
Cummings, JH, Bingham, SA, Heaton, KW & Eastwood, MA (1992) Fecal weight, colon cancer risk and dietary intake of non-starch polysaccharides (dietary fiber). Gastroenterology 103, 17831789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, JH, Hill, MJ, Bone, ES, Branch, WJ & Jenkins, DJA (1979) The effect of meat protein and dietary fiber on colonic function and metabolism. II. Bacterial metabolites in feces and urine. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 20942101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummings, JH, Stephen, AM & Branch, WJ (1981) Implications of dietary fibre breakdown in the human colon. In Banbury Report no. 7. Gastrointestinal Cancer, pp. 7181 [Bruce, WR, Correa, P, Lipkin, M, Tannenbaum, S and Wilkins, TD, editors]. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
Day, N, Oakes, S, Luben, R, Khaw, K-T, Bingham, S, Welch, A & Wareham, N (1998) EPIC in Norfolk: Study design and characteristics of the cohort. British Journal of Cancer (In the Press).Google Scholar
Department of Health (1998) Nutritional Aspects of the Development of Cancer. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 48. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Fearon, ER & Vogelstein, B (1990) A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Review. Cell 61, 759767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, AN, Michalek, AM, Muro, K, Mettlin, CJ, Asirwatham, JE, Brooks, JS, Petrelli, NJ, Caporaso, NE & Hamilton, SR (1997) Meat consumption is associated with k-ras mutation in tumors of the distal colorectum. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 38, 457.Google Scholar
Gooderham, MJ, Adlercreutz, H, Ojala, S, Wahala, K & Holub, BJ (1996) Soy protein and heart disease risk factors. Journal of Nutrition 126, 20002006.Google Scholar
Hague, A, Manning, AM, Hanlon, KA, Hueschtchav, L, Hart, D & Paraskeva, C (1993) Sodium butyrate induces apoptosis in human colonic tumour cell lines. International Journal of Cancer 55, 498505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, CC (1993) At the cross roads of molecular carcinogenesis and risk assessment. Science 262, 19801981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollstein, M, Sidransky, D, Vogelstein, B & Harris, CC (1991) p53 mutations in human cancer. Science 253, 4953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R (1999) The effects of diet on colonic N-nitrosation and biomarkers of DNA damage. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hughes, R, Pollock, JRA & Bingham, S (1999) Dose response effect with dietary meat on faecal N-nitrosocompound and nitrogen excretion in humans. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58, OOOA.Google Scholar
Iyengar, R, Stuehr, DJ & Marletta, MA (1987) Macrophage synthesis of nitrate, nitrite, and N nitrosamines, precursors and the role of the respiratory burst. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 84, 63696373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, TJ, Fraser, GE, Thorogood, M, Appleby, PN, Beral, V, Reeves, G, Burr, ML, Chang-Claud, J, Frentzel-Beyme, R, Kuzma, JW, Mann, J & McPherson, K (1998) Mortality in vegetarians and non-vegetarians: a collaborative analysis of 8300 deaths among 76,000 men and women in five prospective studies. Public Health Nutrition 1, 3341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layton, DW, Bogen, KT, Knize, MG, Hatch, FT, Johnson, VM & Felton, JS (1995) Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research. Carcinogenesis 16, 3952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlane, GT & Cummings, JH (1991) The colonic flora, fermentation, and large bowel digestive function. The Large Intestine: Physiology, Pathophysiology and Disease, pp. 5192 [Phillips, S, Pemberton, JH and Shorter, RG, editors]. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Mallett, AK, Walters, DG & Rowland, IR (1988) Protein related differences in the excretion of nitrosoproline and nitrate by the rat. Food and Chemical Toxicology 26, 831835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massey, RC, Key, PE, Mallett, AK & Rowland, IR (1988) An investigation of the endogenous formation of ATNC in conventional microflora and germ free rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology 26, 595600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, C (1998) The effects of red meat, vegetables and tea on faecal nitrogen and ammonia excretion in healthy male volunteers. Undergraduate Dissertation, University of Ulster at Coleraine.Google Scholar
Parkin, DM, Muir, CS, Whelan, SL, Gao, YT, Ferlay, J & Powell, J (1992) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google ScholarPubMed
Riboli, E (1992) Nutrition and cancer: Background and rationale of EPIC. Annals of Oncology 3, 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts-Thompson, IC, Ryan, P, Khoo, KK, Hart, WJ, McMichael, AJ & Butler, RN (1996) Diet, acetylator phenotype, and risk of colorectal neoplasia. Lancet 347, 13721374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, IR, Granli, T, Bockman, OC, Key, PE & Massey, RC (1991) Endogenous N nitrosation in man assessed by measurement of apparent total N nitroso compounds in faeces. Carcinogenesis 12, 13591401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvester, KR, Bingham, SA, Pollack, JRA, Cummings, JH & O'Neill, IK (1997) Effect of meat and resistant starch on fecal excretion of ATNC and ammonia from the human large bowel. Nutrition and Cancer 29, 1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvester, KR & Cummings, JH (1995) Does digestibility of meat protein help explain large bowel cancer risk? Nutrition and Cancer 24, 279288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, E, Voss, R, Hall, V, Bodmer, WF, Jass, JR, Jeffreys, AJ, Lucibello, FC, Patel, I & Rider, SH (1987) Chromosome 5 allele loss in human colorectal cancer. Nature 328, 616619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenberg, A & Muller, A (1993) Constipation and cathartics as risk factors in colorectal cancer. Pharmacology 47, 224–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouthammer, AH (1976) Biochemistry and genetics of nitrate reductase in bacteria. Advances in Microbiological Physiology 14, 315375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, RC, Matharoo, B, Faulder, GC, Jones, P, Cotton, WC, Elder, JB & Deakin, M (1991) The human GST: a case control study of the incidence of the GST1 O phenotype in patients with adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis 12, 2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuehr, DJ & Marletta, MA (1985) Mammalian nitrate synthesis: mouse macrophages produce nitrate and nitrite in response to E. coli lipopolysaccharide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82, 77387742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugimura, T (1986) Past, present, and future of mutagens in cooked foods. Environmental Health Perspectives 67, 510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tank, ES, Krausch, DN & Lapides, J (1973) Adenocarcinoma of the colon associated with ureterosigmoidoscopy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 16, 300304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turteltaub, KW, Mauthe, RJ, Dingley, KH, Vogel, JS, Frantz, CE, Garner, RC & Shen, N (1997) MelQx-DNA adduct formation in rodent and human tissues at low doses. Mutation Research 376, 243252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, DA, Young, VR & Tannerbaum, SR (1983) Mammalian nitrate synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 80, 45184521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, JM, Anjo, T, Ohannesian, L, Keefer, LK, Devor, DE, Donovan, PJ, Smith, GT, Henneman, JR, Streeter, AJ, Konishi, N, Rehm, S, Reist, EJ, Bradford, WW III & Rice, JM (1988) Inactivity of fecapentaene 12 as a rodent carcinogen or tumour initiator. Cancer Letters 42, 4959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, WC (1995) Diet, nutrition and avoidable cancer. Environmental Health Perspectives 103, Suppl. 8, 165170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witter, JP, Balish, E & Gatley, SJ (1979) Origin of excess urinary nitrate in the rat. Cancer Research 42, 36453648.Google Scholar
You have Access
91
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

High-meat diets and cancer risk
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

High-meat diets and cancer risk
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

High-meat diets and cancer risk
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *