Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dencker, Anna Premberg, Åsa Olander, Ellinor K. McCourt, Christine Haby, Karin Dencker, Sofie Glantz, Anna and Berg, Marie 2016. Adopting a healthy lifestyle when pregnant and obese – an interview study three years after childbirth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,


    Keely, Alice Lawton, Julia Swanson, Vivien and Denison, Fiona C. 2015. Barriers to breast-feeding in obese women: A qualitative exploration. Midwifery, Vol. 31, Issue. 5, p. 532.


    McKeating, Aoife Maguire, Patrick J. Daly, Niamh Farren, Maria McMahon, Léan and Turner, Michael J. 2015. Trends in maternal obesity in a large university hospital 2009-2013. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Vol. 94, Issue. 9, p. 969.


    Onubi, Ojochenemi J. Marais, Debbi Aucott, Lorna Okonofua, Friday and Poobalan, Amudha S. 2015. Maternal obesity in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Public Health, p. fdv138.


    Heslehurst, N. Newham, J. Maniatopoulos, G. Fleetwood, C. Robalino, S. and Rankin, J. 2014. Implementation of pregnancy weight management and obesity guidelines: a meta-synthesis of healthcare professionals' barriers and facilitators using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Obesity Reviews, Vol. 15, Issue. 6, p. 462.


    Heslehurst, Nicola Crowe, Lisa Robalino, Shannon Sniehotta, Falko F McColl, Elaine and Rankin, Judith 2014. Interventions to change maternity healthcare professionals’ behaviours to promote weight-related support for obese pregnant women: a systematic review. Implementation Science, Vol. 9, Issue. 1,


    Poston, Lucilla Briley, Annette L Barr, Suzanne Bell, Ruth Croker, Helen Coxon, Kirstie Essex, Holly N Hunt, Claire Hayes, Louise Howard, Louise M Khazaezadeh, Nina Kinnunen, Tarja Nelson, Scott M Oteng-Ntim, Eugene Robson, Stephen C Sattar, Naveed Seed, Paul T Wardle, Jane Sanders, Thomas AB and Sandall, Jane 2013. Developing a complex intervention for diet and activity behaviour change in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT trial); assessment of behavioural change and process evaluation in a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,


    Sanders, Thomas A. B. 2013. Nutrition and Development.


    Turner, Michael J. and Layte, Richard 2013. Obesity levels in a national cohort of women 9 months after delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 209, Issue. 2, p. 124.e1.


    2013. Nutrition and Development.


    Heslehurst, Nicola Sattar, Naveed Rajasingam, Daghni Wilkinson, John Summerbell, Carolyn D and Rankin, Judith 2012. Existing maternal obesity guidelines may increase inequalities between ethnic groups: a national epidemiological study of 502,474 births in England. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,


    ×
  • Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Volume 70, Issue 4
  • November 2011, pp. 439-449

Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services

  • Nicola Heslehurst (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0029665111001625
  • Published online: 22 August 2011
Abstract

Obesity is a public health concern worldwide, arising from multifaceted and complex causes that relate to individual choice and lifestyle, and the influences of wider society. In addition to a long-standing focus on both childhood and adult obesity, there has been more recent concern relating to maternal obesity. This review explores the published evidence relating to maternal obesity incidence and associated inequalities, the impact of obesity on maternity services, and associated guidelines. Epidemiological data comprising three national maternal obesity datasets within the UK have identified a significant increase in maternal obesity in recent years, and reflect broad socio-demographic inequalities particularly deprivation, ethnicity and unemployment. Obese pregnancies present increased risk of complications that require more resource intensive antenatal and perinatal care, such as caesarean deliveries, gestational diabetes, haemorrhage, infections and congenital anomalies. Healthcare professionals also face difficulties when managing the care of women in pregnancy as obesity is an emotive and stigmatising topic. There is a lack of good-quality evidence for effective interventions to tackle maternal obesity. Recently published national guidelines for the clinical management and weight management of maternal obesity offer advice for professionals, but acknowledge the limitations of the evidence base. The consequence of these difficulties is an absence of support services available for women. Further evaluative research is thus required to assess the effectiveness of interventions with women before, during and after pregnancy. Qualitative work with women will also be needed to help inform the development of more sensitive risk communication and women-centred services.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Dr Nicola Heslehurst, fax +44 1642 342758, email n.heslehurst@tees.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

30.N Heslehurst , J Rankin , JR Wilkinson (2010) A nationally representative study of maternal obesity in England, UK: trends in incidence and demographic inequalities in 619 323 births, 1989–2007. Int J Obes 34, 420428.

31.M Knight , JJ Kurinczuk , P Spark (2010) Extreme obesity in pregnancy in the United Kingdom. Obstet Gynecol 115, 989997.

34.MG Kanagalingam , NG Forouhi , IA Greer (2005) Changes in booking body mass index over a decade: retrospective analysis from a Glasgow Maternity Hospital. BJOG 112, 14311433.

42.N Heslehurst , H Simpson , LJ Ells (2008) The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 9, 635683.

43.AS Poobalan , LS Aucott , T Gurung (2008) Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women – systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev 10, 2835.

44.KJ Stothard , PWG Tennant , R Bell (2009) Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301, 636650.

45.J Rankin , P Tennant , K Stothard (2010) Maternal obesity and congenital anomaly risk: a cohort study. Int J Obes 34, 13711380.

46.MR Torloni , AP Betran , S Daher (2009) Maternal BMI and preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22, 957970.

48.E Oken (2009) Maternal and child obesity: the causal link. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 36, 361377.

55.MM Rogge , M Greenwald & A Golden (2004) Obesity, stigma, and civilised oppression. Adv Nurs Sci 27, 301315.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: