Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services

  • Nicola Heslehurst (a1)
Abstract

Obesity is a public health concern worldwide, arising from multifaceted and complex causes that relate to individual choice and lifestyle, and the influences of wider society. In addition to a long-standing focus on both childhood and adult obesity, there has been more recent concern relating to maternal obesity. This review explores the published evidence relating to maternal obesity incidence and associated inequalities, the impact of obesity on maternity services, and associated guidelines. Epidemiological data comprising three national maternal obesity datasets within the UK have identified a significant increase in maternal obesity in recent years, and reflect broad socio-demographic inequalities particularly deprivation, ethnicity and unemployment. Obese pregnancies present increased risk of complications that require more resource intensive antenatal and perinatal care, such as caesarean deliveries, gestational diabetes, haemorrhage, infections and congenital anomalies. Healthcare professionals also face difficulties when managing the care of women in pregnancy as obesity is an emotive and stigmatising topic. There is a lack of good-quality evidence for effective interventions to tackle maternal obesity. Recently published national guidelines for the clinical management and weight management of maternal obesity offer advice for professionals, but acknowledge the limitations of the evidence base. The consequence of these difficulties is an absence of support services available for women. Further evaluative research is thus required to assess the effectiveness of interventions with women before, during and after pregnancy. Qualitative work with women will also be needed to help inform the development of more sensitive risk communication and women-centred services.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Identifying ‘at risk’ women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author: Dr Nicola Heslehurst, fax +44 1642 342758, email n.heslehurst@tees.ac.uk
References
Hide All
22. N Heslehurst , R Lang , J Rankin (2007) Obesity in pregnancy: a study of the impact of maternal obesity on NHS maternity services. BJOG 114, 334342.

26. L Poston , LF Harthoon , EM Van der Beek . (2011) Obesity in pregnancy: implications for the mother and lifelong health of the child. A consensus statement. Pediatr Res 69, 175180.

28. B Abrams , S Carmichael & S Selvin (1995) Factors associated with the pattern of maternal weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 86, 170176.

29. S Carmichael , B Abrams & S Selvin (1997) The pattern of maternal weight gain in women with good pregnancy outcomes. Am J Public Health 87, 19841988.

30. N Heslehurst , J Rankin , JR Wilkinson (2010) A nationally representative study of maternal obesity in England, UK: trends in incidence and demographic inequalities in 619 323 births, 1989–2007. Int J Obes 34, 420428.

31. M Knight , JJ Kurinczuk , P Spark (2010) Extreme obesity in pregnancy in the United Kingdom. Obstet Gynecol 115, 989997.

33. N Heslehurst , LJ Ells , H Simpson (2007) Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36 821 women over a 15-year period. BJOG 114, 187194.

34. MG Kanagalingam , NG Forouhi , IA Greer (2005) Changes in booking body mass index over a decade: retrospective analysis from a Glasgow Maternity Hospital. BJOG 112, 14311433.

35. TS Usha Kiran , S Hemmadi , J Bethel (2005) Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 112, 768–772.

37. PWG Tennant , J Rankin & R Bell (2011) Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal and infant death; a cohort study from the North of England. Hum Reprod. Epublication ahead of print.

38. H Lashen , K Fear & DW Sturdee (2004) Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 19, 16441646.

39. TE O'Brien , JG Ray & WS Chan (2003) Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview. Epidemiology 14, 368.

40. D Rajasingam , PT Seed , AL Briley (2009) A prospective study of pregnancy outcome and biomarkers of oxidative stress in nulliparous obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200, 395.e1395.e9.

41. MR Torloni , AP Betrán , BL Horta (2008) Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Obes Rev 10, 194203.

42. N Heslehurst , H Simpson , LJ Ells (2008) The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 9, 635683.

43. AS Poobalan , LS Aucott , T Gurung (2008) Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women – systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev 10, 2835.

44. KJ Stothard , PWG Tennant , R Bell (2009) Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301, 636650.

45. J Rankin , P Tennant , K Stothard (2010) Maternal obesity and congenital anomaly risk: a cohort study. Int J Obes 34, 13711380.

46. MR Torloni , AP Betran , S Daher (2009) Maternal BMI and preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22, 957970.

47. E Oken & MW Gillman (2003) Fetal origins of obesity. Obes Res 11, 496506.

48. E Oken (2009) Maternal and child obesity: the causal link. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 36, 361377.

49. TJ Parsons , C Power & O Manor (2001) Fetal and early life growth and body mass index from birth to early adulthood in 1958 British cohort: longitudinal study [see comment]. BMJ 323, 1331.

50. JE Ramsay , I Greer & N Sattar (2006) Obesity and reproduction. BMJ 333, 11591162.

51. SY Chu , DJ Bachman , WM Callaghan (2008) Association between obesity during pregnancy and increased use of health care. New Engl J Med 358, 1444.

54. RM Puhl & CA Heuer (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 17, 941964.

55. MM Rogge , M Greenwald & A Golden (2004) Obesity, stigma, and civilised oppression. Adv Nurs Sci 27, 301315.

56. E Oteng-Ntim , H Pheasant , N Khazaezadeh (2010) Developing a community-based maternal obesity intervention: a qualitative study of service providers’ views. BJOG 117, 16511655.

58. E Merrill & J Grassley (2008) Women's stories of their experiences as overweight patients. J Adv Nurs 64, 139146.

59. TA Wadden & E Didie (2003) What's in a name? patients' preferred terms for describing obesity. Obes Res 11, 11401146.

60. J Keenan & H Stapleton (2010) Bonny babies? Motherhood and nurturing in the age of obesity. Health, Risk Soc 12, 369383.

62. VMK Nyman , AK Prebensen & GEM Flensner (2010) Obese women's experiences of encounters with midwives and physicians during pregnancy and childbirth. Midwifery 26, 424429.

63. I Brown & J Thompson (2007) Primary care nurses' attitudes, beliefs, and own body size in relation to obesity management. J Adv Nurs 60, 535543.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 90 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 188 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.