Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Defining Banjo Enclosures: Investigations, Interpretations, and Understanding in the Iron Age of Southern Britain

  • Alexander T.O. Lang (a1)
Abstract

Banjo enclosures are an important archaeological site type within British Iron Age studies, particularly for southern England. Significant numbers of these sites have been discovered through aerial survey but only a comparatively small number have been explored through additional survey and excavation. Chronologically these sites wholly exist within the Middle and Late Iron Age periods, c. 400 bc to ad 43. As yet there has been no standard interpretive framework for these sites and our understanding and discussion has often been based on the theoretical model most popular at the time of investigation. A key aim of his paper is to question this piecemeal approach and incorporate more recent interpretations from a much-expanded dataset. Since the 1990s large-scale landscape surveys have increased considerably the numbers of sites identified and subsequently the regions in which they are located. Tying this in with recent excavations, we have begun to redefine our understanding of banjo enclosures as more complex in their site development and function, while also providing a simplified framework which accounts for the diversity of forms, locations, and relative associations. Ultimately these enclosures are more complex than previously realised, potentially serving a multiplicity of functions with different phases of use throughout a period of significant change at the end of prehistory.

Définition des enclos banjo: recherches, interprétations et compréhension à l’âge du fer dans le sud de la Grande-Bretagne, d’Alexander T.O. Lang

Les enclos banjo représentent un important site-type archéologique dans les études de l’âge du fer, particulièrement dans le sud de l’Angleterre. Un grand nombre de ces sites ont été découverts grâce à des prospections aériennes mais seulement un nombre comparativement petit a été exploré au moyen d’autres prospections et de fouilles. Chronologiquement ces sites se.situent entièrement dans les périodes de l’âge du fer moyen et tardif, vers 400 av.J.-C. à 43 ap.J.-C.. A ce jour, il n’existe pas de cadre d’interprétation standard pour ces sites et notre compréhension et notre discussion reposaient souvent sur le modèle théorique le plus populaire au moment de l’investigation. Un objectif clé de cet article est de remettre en question cette approche fragmentée et d’incorporer des interprétations plus récentes reposant sur un sensemble de données beaucoup plus étendu. Depuis les années 1990, les prospections de paysage à grande échelle ont considérablement augmenté le nombre de sites identifés et les régions où ils se situaient. En reliant cela avec de récentes excavations, nous avons commencé à redéfinir notre compréhension des enclos banjo, site complexe de développement et de fonction, tout en fournissant aussi un cadre simplifié qui tient compte de la diversité des formes, des lieux et des associations relatives. En fin de compte, ces enclos sont plus complexes que nous ne l’avions cru auparavant, assumant potentiellement de multiples fonctions avec diverses phases d’utilisation tout au long d’une période d’importants changements à la fin de la préhistoire.

Die Definition von Banjo-Kreisanlagen: Untersuchungen, Interpretationen und Verständnis in der Eisenzeit im Süden Großbritanniens, von Alexander T.O. Lang

Banjo-Kreisanlagen stellen einen wichtigen Typ archäologischer Fundplätze in Studien zur britischen Eisenzeit dar, insbesondere im südlichen England. Eine bedeutende Anzahl solcher Fundplätze wurde durch Luftbildprospektion entdeckt, doch nur eine vergleichsweise kleine Anzahl wurde durch zusätzliche Surveys und Ausgrabungen untersucht. Chronologisch gehören diese Fundplätze klar in die Mittlere und Späte Eisenzeit, ca. 400 v. Chr. bis 43 n. Chr. Bisher gab es keinen Konsens über die Interpretation dieser Fundplätze, und unser Verständnis und unsere Diskussionen basierten oft auf jenem Modell, dass zur Zeit der jeweiligen Untersuchung gerade am populärsten war. Ein zentrales Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es deshalb, diesen stückhaften Ansatz in Frage zu stellen und jüngere Interpretationen einzubeziehen, die auf einer deutlich größeren Datengrundlage basieren. Seit den 1990er Jahren konnte durch großräumige Landschaftsaufnahmen die Zahl identifizierter Fundplätze beträchtlich vergrößert werden wie auch die Zahl der Regionen, in denen sie vorhanden sind. Mit der Verknüpfung dieser Daten mit derzeitigen Ausgrabungen haben wir begonnen unser Verständnis von Banjo-Kreisanlagen neu zu definieren, die nun als deutlich komplexer in ihrer Entwicklung und Nutzung begriffen werden können, und zugleich einen vereinfachten Interpretationsrahmen zu erstellen, der die Diversität ihrer Formen, Lokalisationen und Beziehungen berücksichtigt. Letztendlich sind diese Anlagen weit komplexer als bisher erkannt und dienten möglicherweise einer Vielzahl von Funktionen mit unterschiedlichen Nutzungsphasen während einer Periode signifikanten Wandels am Ende der Vorgeschichte.

Definiendo los recintos de tipo “banjo”: investigaciones, interpretación y comprensión de la Edad del Hierro en el sur de Inglaterra, por Alexander T.O. Lang

Los recintos de tipo “banjo” representan un tipo importante de contextos en el estudio de la Edad del Hierro en Inglaterra, particularmente en el sur de Inglaterra. Un elevado número de estos sitios ha sido descubierto mediante prospección aérea pero sólo un reducido número de ellos ha sido explorado mediante técnicas adicionales y excavación. Cronológicamente estos sitios solamente existen durante los períodos medio y tardío de la Edad del Hierro, c. 400 bc al ad 43. Por ello, no se ha propuesto un marco interpretativo para estos sitios y nuestra interpretación y discusión sobre ellos a menudo se ha basado en los modelos teóricos dominantes en el momento de su investigación. Un aspecto importante en este artículo es cuestionar este enfoque fragmentario e incorporar las interpretaciones más recientes basadas en un conjunto de datos más extensos. Desde los años 1990 las prospecciones del paisaje a gran escala han incrementado considerablemente el número de sitios identificados y las regiones en las que éstos se localizan. Aunando esto con las excavaciones recientes, comienza a redefinirse nuestra comprensión de los recintos tipos “banjo”, como realidades más complejas en el desarrollo y función de los sitios al tiempo que se facilitan marcos interpretativos más sencillos que explican la diversidad de formas, localizaciones y asociaciones relativas. En definitiva, estos recintos son más complejos que lo considerado previamente, sirviendo potencialmente para múltiples funciones en diferentes fases de uso a lo largo de un período de cambios significativos al final de la Prehistoria.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allen, T.G. & Robinson, M. 1993. The Prehistoric Landscape and Iron Age Enclosed Settlement at Mingies Ditch, Hardwick-with-Yelford, Oxon. Oxford: Oxford Archaeological Unit
Allen, T.G., Miles, D. & Palmer, S. 1984. Iron Age buildings in the Upper Thames Region. In B. Cunliffe & D. Miles (eds), Aspects of the Iron Age in Central Southern Britain, 89101. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 2
Barber, A.J. & Pannett, A. 2006. Archaeological excavations along the Milford Haven to Aberdulais Natural Gas Pipeline 2006: A preliminary report. Archaeology in Wales 46, 8799
Barrett, J.C., Bradley, R. & Green, M. 1991. Landscape, Monuments and Society: the prehistory of Cranborne Chase. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Benson, D. & Miles, D. 1974. The Upper Thames Valley: an archaeological survey of the river gravels. Oxford: Oxford Archaeological Unit
Bewley, B. 2003. Prehistoric Settlements. Stroud: Tempus
Bonney, D.J. & Moore, C.N. 1967. Hamshill Ditches, Barford St Martin. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 62, 118121
Booth, P., Dodd, A., Robinson, M. & Smith, A. 2009. The Archaeology of the Gravel Terraces of the Upper and Middle Thames: the early historical period: ad 1–1000. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology
Bowden, M. & McOmish, D. 1987. The required barrier. Scottish Archaeological Review 4, 7684
Collis, J.R. 1968. Excavations at Owslebury, Hants. Antiquaries Journal 48, 1831
Collis, J.R. 1970. Excavations at Owslebury, Hants. Antiquaries Journal 50, 246251
Collis, J.R. 1996. Hill-forts, enclosures and boundaries. In T. Champion & J.R. Collis (eds), The Iron Age in Britain and Ireland: Recent trends, 87–94. Sheffield: J.R. Collis Publications
Collis, J.R. 2006. Enclosure in Iron Age Wessex: The view from modern Avila. In A.F. Harding, S. Sievers & N. Venclova (eds), Enclosing the Past: Inside and outside in prehistory, 155–62. Sheffield: J.R. Collis Publications
Corney, M. 1989. Multiple ditch systems and Late Iron Age settlement in central Wessex. In M. Bowden, D. Mackay & P. Topping (eds), From Cornwall to Caithness: some aspects of British field archaeology, 111128. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 209
Crawford, O.G.S. & Keiller, A. 1928. Wessex from the Air. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Cunliffe, B. 1997. The Ancient Celts. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cunliffe, B. 2000. The Danebury Environs Programme: The prehistory of a Wessex landscape. Volume 1: introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 48
Cunliffe, B. 2005. Iron Age Communities in Britain: an account of England, Scotland and Wales from the seventh century BC until the Roman conquest, 3rd edn. London: Routledge
Cunliffe, B. & Poole, C. 2000. The Danebury Environs Programme: the prehistory of a Wessex landscape. Volume 2, part 5: Nettlebank Copse, Wherwell, Hants, 1993. Oxford: Oxford University School of Archaeology Monograph 49
Cunliffe, B. & Poole, C. 2008. The Danebury Environs Roman Programme: Volume 2, part 2: Grateley South, Grateley, Hants, 1998 and 1999. Oxford: Oxford University School of Archaeology Monograph 71
Darvill, T.C., Saunders, A. & Startin, B. 1987. A question of national importance: Approaches to the evaluation of ancient monuments for the Monuments Protection Programme in England. Antiquity 61, 393408
Edis, J., MacLeod, D. & Bewley, B. 1989. An archaeologist’s guide to classification of cropmarks and soilmarks. Antiquity 63, 112126
Fasham, P.J. 1987. A Banjo Enclosure in Micheldever Wood, Hampshire. Winchester: Hampshire Field Club Archaeology Society Monograph 5
Featherstone, R. & Bewley, B. 2000. Recent aerial reconnaissance in North Oxfordshire. Oxoniensia 65, 1326
Ford, S., Bowden, M., Mees, G. & Gaffney, V. 1988. The date of the ‘Celtic’ field systems on the Berkshire Downs. Britannia 19, 401404
Gaffney, C. & Gater, J. 2003. Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for archaeologists. Stroud: Tempus
Harding, P. 2007. Two possible Iron Age ‘banjo’ enclosures and a Romano-British villa and settlement at Beach’s Barn, Fittleton, Salisbury Plain. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine 100, 8390
Hey, G. 2007. Unravelling the Iron Age landscape of the upper Thames valley. In C. Haselgrove & T. Moore (eds), The Later Iron Age in Britain and Beyond, 156172. Oxford: Oxbow Books
Hill, J.D. 1995. Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: A study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 242
Hingley, R. 1982. Kiddington: Tomlin’s Gate. CBA Group 9 Newsletter 12, 154
Hingley, R. 1984a. Towards social analysis in archaeology: Celtic society in the Iron Age of the upper Thames valley. In B. Cunliffe & D. Miles (eds), Aspects of the Iron Age in Central Southern Britain, 7288. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 2
Hingley, R. 1984b. The archaeology of settlement and the social significance of space. Scottish Archaeological Review 3, 2230
Hingley, R. 1990. Boundaries surrounding Iron Age and Roman-British Settlement. Scottish Archaeological Review 7, 96103
Hingley, R. 1999. The creation of later prehistoric landscapes and the context of reuse of Neolithic and earlier Bronze Age monuments in Britain and Ireland. In B. Bevan (ed.), Northern Exposure: interpretive devolution and the Iron Ages in Britain, 233–51. Leicester: Leicester Archaeology Monograph 4
Hingley, R. & Miles, D. 1984. Aspects of Iron Age settlement in the upper Thames valley. In B. Cunliffe & D. Miles (eds), Aspects of the Iron Age in Central Southern Britain, 5271. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 2
Hingley, R. & Darvill, T.C. 1988. Monument Class Description (MCD) for MPP. http://www.eng-h.gov.uk/mpp/mcd/mcdtop1.htm
Holgate, R. 1986. Excavations at the prehistoric and Romano-British enclosure complex at Carne’s Seat, Goodwood, West Sussex 1984. Sussex Archaeological Collections 124, 3550
Kenney, S. & Lyons, A. 2011. An Iron Age banjo enclosure and contemporary settlement at Caldecote, Cambridgeshire. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 100, 6784
Lambrick, G. & Robinson, M. 1979. Iron Age and Roman Riverside Settlements at Farmoor, Oxfordshire. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 32
Lambrick, G. & Robinson, M. 2009. The Archaeology of the Upper and Middle Thames: the first foundations of modern society in the Thames valley 1500 bc–ad 50. Oxford: Oxford University School of Archaeology
Lock, G., Gosden, C. & Daly, P. 2005. Segsbury Camp: Excavations in 1996 and 1997 at an Iron Age hillfort on the Oxfordshire Ridgeway. Oxford: Oxford University School of Archaeology Monograph 61
Moore, T. 2006. Iron Age Societies in the Severn-Cotswolds: developing narratives of social and landscape change. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 421
Moore, T. 2007a. Life on the edge? Exchange, settlement and identity in the later Iron Age of the Severn Cotswolds. In C. Haselgrove & T. Moore (eds), The Later Iron Age in Britain and Beyond, 4161. Oxford: Oxbow Books
Moore, T. 2007b. The Early to Later Iron Age transition in the Severn-Cotswolds: Enclosing the household?. In C. Haselgrove & R. Pope (eds), The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent, 259278. Oxford: Oxbow Books
Moore, T. 2007c. Perceiving communities: Exchange, landscapes and social networks in the later Iron Age of western Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 26, 79102
Moore, T. 2012. Beyond the oppida: Polyfocal complexes and Late Iron Age societies in southern Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 31(4), 391417
Palmer, R. 1984. Danebury. An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire: An aerial photographic interpretation of its environs. London: RCHME/HMSO
Perry, B.T. 1966. Some recent discoveries in Hampshire. In A.C. Thomas (ed.), Rural Settlement in Roman Britain, 3942. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 7
Perry, B.T. 1969. Iron Age enclosures and settlements on the Hampshire Chalklands. Archaeological Journal 126, 2943
Perry, B.T. 1974. Excavations at Bramdean, Hampshire, 1965 and 1966, and a discussion of similar sites in southern England. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeology Society 29(1972), 4177
Perry, B.T. 1982. Excavations at Bramdean, Hampshire, 1973–1977. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeology Society 38, 5774
Perry, B.T. 1986. Excavations at Bramdean, Hampshire, 1983 & 1984 with some further discussions of the Banjo syndrome. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeology Society 42, 3542
Pryor, F. 2001. The Flag Fen Basin: archaeology and environment of a Fenland landscape. Swindon: English Heritage
Richards, J.C. 1978. The Archaeology of the Berkshire Downs: an introductory survey. Reading: Berkshire Archaeological Committee Publication 3
Robinson, M. & Lambrick, G. 1984. Holocene allluviation and hydrology in the upper Thames basin. Nature 308, 809814
Stead, I.A. 1966. Excavations in Blagden Copse, Hurstbourne Tarrant, Hampshire, 1961. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeology Society 23, 8189
Thomas, R. 1997. Land, kinship relations and the rise of enclosed settlement in the first millennium bc . Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16(2), 211218
Von Nicolai, C. 2009. La question des Viereckschanzen d’Allemagne du Sud revistée. In I. Bertrand, A. Duval, J. Gomez de Soto & P. Maguer (eds), Habitats et paysages ruraux en Gaule et regards sur d’autres régions du monde celtique: actes du XXXIe colloque international de l’Association française pour l'étude de l'âge du fer, 17–20 mai 2007, Chauvigny, 241276. Chauvigny: Mémoire 35
Williams, R.J., Hart, P.J. & Williams, A.T.L. 1996. Wavendon Gate: a Late Iron Age and Roman settlement in Milton Keynes. Bristol: Buckinghamshire Archaeological Society Monograph 10
Winton, H. 2003. Possible Iron Age ‘banjo’ enclosures on the Lambourn Downs. Oxoniensia 68, 1526
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
  • ISSN: 0079-497X
  • EISSN: 2050-2729
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-prehistoric-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 21
Total number of PDF views: 149 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 486 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.