Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:08:14.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘Policultivo Ganadero’, or the Secondary Products Revolution in Spanish Agriculture, 5000–1000 bc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

R.J. Harrison*
Affiliation:
Department of Classics and Archaeology, University of Bristol, 11 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TB, England

Abstract

In the Secondary Products Revolution model advanced by Sherratt it was predicted that increased use of animals for labour and dairy products would be visible archaeologically in animal bone collections. Published faunal data from Spain and Portugal for the period 5000–1000 bc show that horses, traction animals and dairy products all became more important after 2000 bc. An historical-geographical analogy from pre-industrial Spain suggests that by 1500 bc there was a degree of specialization in stockraising which could be understood best if sites were integrated economically over a wide region. This is the ‘policultivo ganadero’ of Spanish geographers, and the title is selected deliberately to compare with the Mediterranean polyculture based on plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Almagro Basch, M., 1960. Inventaria Archaeologica. España E-4. Madrid.Google Scholar
Almagro Gorbea, M., 1983. ‘Pilares-estela ibéricos’, in Homenaje al Prof. Martin Almagro Basch, t. III, 720. Madrid.Google Scholar
Aparicio Pérez, J., 1976. Estudio Económico y Social de la Edad del Bronce Valenciano. Valencia.Google Scholar
Arribas y Palau, A., 1968. ‘Las bases económicas del Neolítico al Bronce’, in Tarradell, M. (ed.), Estudios de Economia Antigua de la Península Ibérica, 3360. Madrid.Google Scholar
Arribas y Palau, A., and Molina, F., 1984. ‘Estado actual de la investigación del megalitísmo en la Península Ibérica’, in Pérez, J. Fortea (ed.), Scripta Praehistorica Francisco Jordá Oblata, 63112. Salamanca.Google Scholar
Arribas y Palau, A., Pareja López, E., Molina González, F., Arteaga Matute, O., and Molina Fajardo, F., 1974. ‘Excavaciónes en el Poblado de la Edad del Bronce “Cerro de la Encina” Monachil (Granada) (El Corte Estratigráfico No. 3)’, Ex. Arqu. en España 81. Madrid.Google Scholar
Arribas y Palau, A., Molina, F., Saez, L., de la Torre, F., Aguayo, P., and Nájera, T., 1979. ‘Excavaciónes en Los Millares (Santa Fé, Almería). Campañas de 1978 y 1979’, Cuad. de Prehist. de la Univ. de Granada 4, 6196.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. and Bertram, J. B., 1977. ‘Bone Frequencies and Attritional Processes’, in Binford, L. R. (ed.), For Theory Building in Archaeology, 77153. New York, San Francisco and London.Google Scholar
Boessneck, J., 1969. ‘Die Knochenfunde vom Cerro del Real bei Galera (Prov. Granada)’, STIH 1, 142.Google Scholar
Boessneck, J. and Von den Driesch, A., 1980. ‘Tier-knochenfunde aus vier Südspanischen Höhlen’, STIH 7, 183.Google Scholar
Brain, C. J., 1981. The Hunters or Hunted ? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy. Chicago.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. C., 1982. ‘“The Secondary Products Revolution” and the Limitations of the Neolithic’, Bull. Inst. Archaeol. Univ. London 19, 107–22.Google Scholar
Chapman, R., 1981. ‘The Megalithic Tombs of Iberia’, in Evans, J., Cunliffe, B. and Renfrew, A. C. (eds), Antiquity and Man: Essays in Honour ofGlyn Daniel, 93105. London.Google Scholar
Fundación Juan March, 1978. C-14 y Prehistoría de la Península Ibérica. Madrid.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 1976. ‘Bronze Age Dynamics in Southeast Spain’, Dialectical Anthropology 1, 307–19.Google Scholar
Gilman, A., 1981. ‘The development of social stratification in Bronze Age Europe’, Current Anthropology 22, 123.Google Scholar
Grigson, C., 1982. ‘Sex and Age determination of some bones and teeth of domestic cattle: a review of the literature’, in Wilson, B., Gregson, C. and Payne, S. (eds), Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, 723. BAR British Series 109, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hain, F. H., 1982. ‘Kupferzeitliche Tierknochenfunde aus Valencina de la Concepción/Sevilla’, STIH 8.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J., 1977. The Bell Beaker Cultures of Spain and Portugal. American School of Prehistoric Research, vol. 35. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J., 1980. The Beaker Folk: Copper Age Archaeology in Western Europe. London.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J., 1984. ‘Nuevas aportaciones sobre la paleoeconomia de la Edad del Bronce en el Norte de España’, in Pérez, J. Fortea (ed.), Scripta Praehistórica Francisco Jordá Oblata, 287315. Salamanca.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J., Moreno López, G., and Legge, A. J., 1985. Moncín: Poblado Prehistórico de la Edad del Bronce (I). CSIC Fernando el Católico, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Higham, C. F. W., 1968. ‘Stock rearing as a cultural factor in prehistoric Europe’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 33, 84106.Google Scholar
Higham, C. F. W., and Message, M., 1969. ‘An assessment of a prehistoric technique of bovine husbandry’, in Broth-well, D. and Higgs, E. (eds), Science and Archaeology, 315–30. 2nd. ed., London.Google Scholar
Ijzereef, G. F., 1981. Bronze Age Animal Bones from Bovenkarspel. R. O. B., Amersfoort.Google Scholar
Lauk, H.-D., 1976. ‘Tierknochenfunde aus bronzezeitlichen Siedlungen bei Monachil und Purullena (Provinz Granada)’, STIH 6, 1109.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J., 1981. ‘Aspects of Cattle Husbandry’, in Mercer, R. (ed.), Farming Practice in British Prehistory, 169–81. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J., 1981a. ‘The Agricultural Economy’, in Mercer, R. (ed.), Excavations at Grimes Graves, 79103. London.Google Scholar
Lewthwaite, J. G., 1984. ‘Early Herders and their Flocks’, in Clutton-Brock, J. and Grigson, C. (eds), Animals and Archaeology III, 2537. BAR International Series 202, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lull, V., 1983. La Cultura de El Argar. Madrid.Google Scholar
Maltby, J. M., 1982. ‘The variability of faunal samples and their effects on ageing data’, in Wilson, B., Gregson, C. and Payne, S. (eds), Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, 8190. BAR British Series 109, Oxford.Google Scholar
Martí Oliver, B., 1978. ‘El Neolítico de la Península Ibérica’, Saguntum 13, 5998. Valencia.Google Scholar
Martin Morales, C., 1983. ‘Las fechas de Quintanar (Munera, Albacete) y la cronológia absoluta de la Meseta Sur’, in Homenaje al Prof. Martin Almagro, t. II, 2335. Madrid.Google Scholar
Molina González, F., 1978. ‘Definitión y sistematizacion del Bronce Tardío y Final en el Sudeste de la Península Ibérica’, Cuad. de Prehist. de la Univ. de Granada 3, 159232.Google Scholar
Molina González, F., and Arteaga, O., 1976. ‘Problemática y diferenciación en grupos de la cerámica con decoratión excisa en la Península Ibérica’, Cuad. de Prehist. de la Univ. de Granada 1, 175214.Google Scholar
Molina González, F., and Nájera, T., 1978. ‘Die motillas von Azuer und Los Palacios (Prov. Cuidad Real)’, Madrider Mitteilungen 19, 5274.Google Scholar
Molina González, F., and Pareja López, E., 1975. ‘Excavaciónes en La Cuesta del Negro (Purullena, Granada). Campaña de 1971’, Ex. Arq. en España 86. Madrid.Google Scholar
Montjardin, R. (ed.), 1982. Le Néolithique Ancien Mediterranéen: Actes du Colloque International de Préhistoire, Montpellier 1981.Google Scholar
Muñoz Amilibia, A. Ma., 1965. La Cultura Neolítica Catalana. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Muñoz Amilibia, A. Ma., 1984. ‘La neolitización en España: problemas y líneas de investigatión’, in Pérez, J. Fortea (ed.). Scripta Praehistorica Francisco Jordá Oblata, 349–69. Salamanca.Google Scholar
Navarrete, M. S., 1976. La Cultura de las Cuevas con Cerámica Decorada en Andalucía Oriental. Granada.Google Scholar
Ortega Valcarcel, J., 1974. La Transformación de un Espacio Rural: Las Montañas de Burgos. Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid.Google Scholar
Pellicer y Catalan, M., 1984. ‘La problemática del bronce final-hierro del nordeste hispano: elementos de sustrato’, in Pérez, J. Fortea (ed.), Scripta Praehistorica Francisco Jordá Oblata, 399430. Salamanca.Google Scholar
Pellicer y Catalan, M., and Schüle, W., 1961. ‘El Cerro del Real, Galera (Granada)’, Ex. Arq. en España 12. Madrid.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L., 1983. Sheep and Man. London.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, E. and Schubart, H., 1981. Zambujal, Die Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Vol. I. Mainz.Google Scholar
Savory, H. N., 1968. Spain and Portugal. London.Google Scholar
Schubart, H., 1975. Die Kultur der Bronzezeit im Südwesten der Iberischen Halbinsel. Madrider Forschungen 9, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schüle, W., 1980. Orce und Galera. Mainz.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. G., 1981. ‘Plough and Pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products revolution’, in Hodder, I., Isaac, Gl. and Hammond, N. (eds), Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honour of David Clarke, 261305. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Terrón, E., 1981. Agricultura General, compuesta por Alonso de Herrera. Madrid.Google Scholar
Von den Driesch, A., 1972. ‘Osteoarchäologische Untersuchungen auf der Iberischen Halbinsel’, STIH 3.Google Scholar
Von den Driesch, A., 1976. ‘Die tierschen Beigaben in den Graben der Siedlung “Cuesta del Negro” bei Purullena/Granada’, STIH 6, 112–17.Google Scholar
Von den Driesch, A., and Boessneck, J., 1976. ‘Castro do Zambujal. Die Fauna’, STIH 5, 1142.Google Scholar
Von den Driesch, A., and Boessneck, J., 1980. ‘Die Motillas von Azuer und Los Palacios (Prov. Ciudad Real)’, STIH 7, 84121.Google Scholar
Von den Driesch, A., and Boessneck, J., 1980a. ‘Tier-knochenfunde aus Sacaojos bei la Bañeza (Prov. Léon)’, STIH 7, 122–59.Google Scholar
Von den Driesch, A., and Morales, A., 1976. ‘Los restos animates del yacimiento de Terrera Ventura (Tabernas, Almería)’, Cuad. de Prehist. y Arqueología de la Univ. Autónotna de Madrid 4, 1534.Google Scholar
Zöbl, D., 1982. Die Transhumanz (Wanderschafthaltung) der europäischen Mittelmeerländer im Mittelalter in historischer, geographischer und volkskundlicher Sicht. Berliner Geographischer Studien Bd. 10, Berlin.Google Scholar