Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 0.277 Render date: 2022-08-14T11:11:51.163Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

100 Years of Suffrage and Girls Still Struggle to Find their “Fit” in Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Angela L. Bos
College of Wooster
Mirya R. Holman
Tulane University
Jill S. Greenlee
Brandeis University
Zoe M. Oxley
Union College
J. Celeste Lay
Tulane University


When women gained the national right to vote 100 years ago, remarkable possibilities for their voice and presence in politics opened. However, despite gains in women’s representation, numerous gaps continue to exist in which adult women engage less in politics than men. In identifying and explaining adult gender gaps, little attention has been given to whether gaps emerge among children. This is a pressing issue because children’s perceptions are likely to influence their participation as adults. This article explores whether and how girls and boys differently view politics and their role in it. We report survey data from more than 1,600 children ages 6 to 12 to explore basic gender gaps in political interest and ambition. We argue that these results may reveal the roots of a larger problem: 100 years after women gained suffrage, girls still express less interest and enthusiasm than boys for political life and political office.

Symposium: Women's Political Involvement in the 100 Years since the Nineteenth Amendment
© American Political Science Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Brah, Avtar, and Phoenix, Ann. 2004. “Ain’t I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 5:7586.Google Scholar
Brinkman, Britney G. 2016. “Promoting Adolescent Girls’ Civic Engagement and Activism.” In The Political Psychology of Women in U.S. Politics, ed. Bos, Angela L. and Schneider, Monica C., 3450. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00402.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2019. “The Resistance as Role Model: Disillusionment and Protest among American Adolescents after 2016.” Political Behavior, OnlineFirst. Available at Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., Bos, Angela L., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2014. “Whose American Government? A Quantitative Analysis of Gender and Authorship in American Politics Texts.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (3): 253–72.10.1080/15512169.2014.921655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffé, Hilde, and Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5): 318–33.10.1007/s11199-009-9729-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2018. “Baker, Bus Driver, Babysitter, Candidate? Revealing the Gendered Development of Political Ambition among Ordinary Americans.” Political Behavior, OnlineFirst. Available at Scholar
Diekman, Amanda B., and Eagly, Alice H.. 2000. “Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (10): 1171–88.10.1177/0146167200262001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, Amanda B., and Murnen, Sarah K.. 2004. “Learning to Be Little Women and Little Men: The Inequitable Gender Equality of Nonsexist Children’s Literature.” Sex Roles 50 (5–6): 373–85.10.1023/B:SERS.0000018892.26527.eaGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Bryce J., Hayes, Matthew, and O’Brien, Diana Z.. 2019. “Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 941–62. 10.1017/S0003055419000467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Wood, Wendy. 2012. “Social Role Theory.” In Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology, ed. van Lange, Paul, Kruglanski, A. W., and Higgens, E. T., 458–76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446249222.n49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Emily M., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2014. “Social Capital and Solving the Puzzle of Black Women’s Political Participation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 331–49.10.1080/21565503.2014.925813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 2002. A Room at a Time: How Women Entered Party Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 248–54.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2017. “Women in Local Government: What We Know and Where We Go from Here.” State and Local Government Review 49 (4): 285–96.10.1177/0160323X17732608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. 1983. “Gender Roles and Inequalities in Political Participation: Results from an Eight-Nation Study.” Political Research Quarterly 36 (3): 364–85.10.1177/106591298303600304Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2013. Girls Just Wanna Not Run: The Gender Gap in Young Americans’ Political Ambition. Washington, DC: American University.Google Scholar
Lay, J. Celeste, Holman, Mirya R., Bos, Angela L., Greenlee, Jill S., Oxley, Zoe M., and Buffett, Allison. 2019. “TIME for Kids to Learn Gender Stereotypes: Analysis of Gender and Political Leadership in a Common Social Studies Resource for Children.” Politics & Gender . Available at Scholar
Letendre, Joan. 2007. “‘Sugar and Spice but Not Always Nice’: Gender Socialization and Its Impact on Development and Maintenance of Aggression in Adolescent Girls.” Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 24 (4): 353–68.10.1007/s10560-007-0088-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine M. 2013. The Woman Suffrage Movement in America: A Reassessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139005104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L. 2018. “The Evolution of Women’s (and Men’s) Partisan Attachments.” In 100 Years of the Nineteenth Amendment: An Appraisal of Women’s Political Activism, ed. McCammon, Holly J. and Banaszak, Lee Ann, 4668. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tracy. 2014. “Women State Legislators and Representation: The Role of Political Parties and Institutions.” State and Local Government Review 46 (2): 146–55.10.1177/0160323X14542441Google Scholar
Oxley, Zoe M., Holman, Mirya R., Greenlee, Jill S., Bos, Angela L., and Celeste Lay, J.. 2020. “Children’s Views of the American Presidency.” Public Opinion Quarterly.10.1093/poq/nfaa007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, Jessica Robinson. 2016. “Mind the Gender Gap: An Experiment on the Influence of Self-Efficacy on Political Interest.” Politics & Gender 12 (1): 198217.10.1017/S1743923X15000628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Stuart A., and Willey, Malcolm M.. 1924. “American Women’s Ineffective Use of the Vote.” Current History 20 (4): 641–47.Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2019. “The Application of Social-Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics.” Political Psychology 40 (S1): 173213.10.1111/pops.12573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., Holman, Mirya R., Diekman, Amanda B., and McAndrew, Thomas. 2016. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 515–31.10.1111/pops.12268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Andrea, and Skulley, Carrie. 2019. “Always Running: Candidate Emergence among Women of Color over Time.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (2): 342–59.10.1177/1065912918789289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan. 2018. “How the West Was Won: Competition, Mobilization, and Women’s Enfranchisement in the United States.” Journal of Politics 80 (2): 442–61.10.1086/696621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bos et al. supplementary material


Download Bos et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 135 KB
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

100 Years of Suffrage and Girls Still Struggle to Find their “Fit” in Politics
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

100 Years of Suffrage and Girls Still Struggle to Find their “Fit” in Politics
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

100 Years of Suffrage and Girls Still Struggle to Find their “Fit” in Politics
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *