Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:28:45.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Effective Congress and Effective Members: What Does it Take?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Barbara Sinclair*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Extract

What are the skills needed to serve effectively in Congress and how do politicians acquire them? Learning to be a member of Congress is unlike learning to be a plumber or a brain surgeon; there is no prescribed course of study and no certification process. The criteria by which we judge whether a brain surgeon or a plumber is good at his or her job are relatively clear and uncontroversial; there is less consensus about what constitutes doing a good job as a member of Congress. Thus, the question that begins this essay cannot be answered simply and directly.

The question can be approached by examining the job of Congress, how Congress has organized itself to do its job and then considering the skills members need to function effectively in that environment. First, however, we must decide what we mean by effectiveness. Members can be considered to function effectively when their behavior furthers their individual objectives. Alternatively, effectiveness can be defined relative to the objectives of the institution, and members can be considered to function effectively when their behavior furthers the Congress's capacity to do its job well. These two different ways of defining effectiveness lead to another important question: are the skills needed to get to, remain in, and get ahead in Congress the same ones needed to make Congress institutionally effective?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Connelly, William and Pitney, John. 1994. Congress' Permanent Minority?: Republicans in the U.S. House. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cook, Timothy. 1989. Making Laws and Making News. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger, ed. 1992. The Postreform Congress. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger and Oleszek, Walter. 1994. Congress and Its Members Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1977, 1981, 1985, 1989, 1993. Congress Reconsidered. 1st ed, New York: Praeger, 1977; other ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hess, Stephen. 1986. The Ultimate Insiders: U.S. Senators in the National Media. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John. 1991. Congressional Careers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Loomis, Burdett. 1988. The New American Politician. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald E. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Price, David. The Congressional Experience. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Rohde, David. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders and Lawmaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara, forthcomming. Unorthodox Lawmaking. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Smith, Hedrick. 1988. The Power Game. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar