Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:31:29.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Balancing Rigor and Relationships in Collaborative Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Oliver Kaplan*
Affiliation:
University of Denver

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Quantitative and Qualitative Collaborative Methodologies
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angel-Ajani, Asale, and Victoria Sanford (eds.). 2006. Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, and Activism . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Atalay, Sonya. 2012. Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities . Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Radio, Caracol. 2017. “Deseo de paz en Colombia es motivo de optimismo: The New York Times.” August 3. http://caracol.com.co/radio/2017/08/03/nacional/1501765207_272866.html.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jacques M., and Buckles, Daniel J.. 2013. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. First edition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Marney, Eary, Matthew, and Kaplan, Oliver. 2002. “Path to Prosperity: Preparing our Workforce.” San Diego Workforce Partnership, SourcePoint, December.Google Scholar
Cyr, Jennifer. 2016. “The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data-Collection Method.” Sociological Methods & Research 45 (2): 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borda, Fals, Orlando, . 2001. “Participatory (Action) Research in Social Theory: Origins and Challenges.” In Handbook of Action Research, ed. Reason, Peter and Hilary Bradbury, Chapter 2. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2012. “Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 717–23.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver. 2015. “Taking it to the Streets: Engaged Research in Political Science.” Working paper. Presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, February 20.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver. 2017. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver, and Serna, Cristina. 2018. “Local Strategies in Atrocity Prevention: Self-Protection Strategies Are Key to Atrocity Prevention.” In Atrocity Prevention and Peace Building: Key Insights and Lessons from a Global Consultation Convened by Peace Direct, April 5.Google Scholar
Knott, Eleanor. 2019. “Beyond the Field: Ethics after Fieldwork in Politically Dynamic Contexts.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 140–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Sharan B., Johnson-Bailey, Juanita, Lee, Ming-Yeh, Kee, Youngwha, Ntseane, Gabo, and Muhamad, Mazanah. 2001. “Power and Positionality: Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status Within and Across Cultures.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 20 (5): 405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, Hemant R., Hall, Andy, and Rasheed Sulaiman, V. 2013. Adaptive Collaborative Approaches in Natural Resource Governance: Rethinking Participation, Learning and Innovation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar