Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-r8t2r Total loading time: 0.341 Render date: 2022-07-01T16:05:42.850Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Conclusion: Managing (In)security in Post-Arab Spring Transitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2013

John Gledhill*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Extract

The long-established authoritarian regimes in Libya, Yemen, and Egypt were very different in form. It is not surprising, therefore, that the way in which those regimes came to an end in 2011 varied significantly across cases. Nor is it surprising that the dynamics of transition in those cases have also varied since the Arab Spring. That said, the studies in this symposium have shown that, despite their many differences, processes of regime transition in Libya, Yemen, and Egypt have also shared two significant traits. First, disagreements among stakeholders over basic questions of institutional design have generated intense uncertainty about the nature of posttransition regimes. Second, political and military actors have occasionally turned to violence, in an effort to “resolve” their disagreements through force. In our symposium, we have tried to clarify the relationship between these shared traits of uncertainty and violence. To do this, we have disaggregated the concept of transitional uncertainty, considered the degree to which different forms of uncertainty have already fomented insecurity in post-Arab Spring states, and offered assessments of whether uncertainty may (continue to) prove destabilizing in those states going forward.

Type
Symposium: Assessing (In)security after the Arab Spring
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashour, Omar. 2012. “From Bad Cop to Good Cop: The Challenge of Security Sector Reform in Egypt.” Paper Series, Number 3. Doha: Brookings Doha Center/Stanford Project on Arab Transitions. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2012/11/19%20security%20sector%20reform%20ashour/omar%20ashour%20english.pdf.Google Scholar
Charbonneau, Bruno. 2012. “War and Peace in Côte D'Ivoire: Violence, Agency, and the Local/International Line.” International Peacekeeping 19 (4): 508–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzat, Dina. 2013. “US Still Backing Morsi as Army Remains Quiescent.” Ahram Online, January 29. http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/63559.aspx.Google Scholar
ICG. 2012. “Yemen: Enduring Conflicts, Threatened Transition.” Middle East Report N°125. Sanaa/Brussels: International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iran%20Gulf/Yemen/125-yemen-enduring-conflicts-threatened-transition.pdf.Google Scholar
ICG. 2013. “Yemen's Military-Security Reform: Seeds of New Conflict?” Middle East Report N°139. Sanaa/Brussels: International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iran%20Gulf/Yemen/139-yemens-military-security-reform-seeds-of-new-conflict.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1990. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2001. Russia's Unfinished Revolution: Political Change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54 (2): 212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuinn, Brian. 2012. “After the Fall: Libya's Evolving Armed Groups.” Geneva: Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/F-Working-papers/SAS-WP12-After-the-Fall-Libya.pdf.Google Scholar
Nossiter, Adam. 2011. “Strikes by U.N. and France Corner Leader of Ivory Coast.” New York Times, April 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/05/world/africa/05ivory.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Perito, Robert, and Kristoff, Madeline. 2010. “Fighting Corruption in Security Sector Reform.” Peacebrief N° 32. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace. http://www.usip.org/files/resources/PB%2032%20Fighting%20Corruption%20in%20SSR.pdf.Google Scholar
Wulf, Herbert. 2004. “Security Sector Reform in Developing and Transitional Countries.” Berghof Handbook Dialogue Series No. 2—Security Sector Reform. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. http://www.berghof-handbook.net/documents/publications/dialogue2_wulf.pdf.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Conclusion: Managing (In)security in Post-Arab Spring Transitions
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Conclusion: Managing (In)security in Post-Arab Spring Transitions
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Conclusion: Managing (In)security in Post-Arab Spring Transitions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *