We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Type
Profession Symposium: Local Control and Realities in the Relationship between Institutional Review Boards and Political Science Research
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Mayer, Kenneth. 2016. “Working through the Unworkable: A View from Inside the IRB Process.”PS: Political Science & Politics49 (2): this issue.Google Scholar
Musoba, Glenda D., Jacob, Stacy A., and Robinson, Leslie J.. 2014. “The Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Faculty: Does the IRB Challenge Professionalism in the Social Sciences?”The Qualitative Report19: 1–14.Google Scholar
Nelson, Cary. 2003. “Can E. T. Phone Home? The Brave New World of University Surveillance?”Academe (September/October): 30–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Amy. 2011. “Professor Sues U. over Research Protocol.”The Brown Daily Herald, March 22. Accessed online June 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Shea, Christopher. 2000. “Don’t Talk to the Humans: The Crackdown on Social Science Research.”Lingua Franca10 (6): 26–34.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. 2006. “Protecting Human Subjects and Preserving Academic Freedom: Prospects at the University of Chicago.”American Ethnologist33 (4): 507–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, Dvora, and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine. 2008. “Reforming Institutional Review Board Policy: Issues in Implementation and Field Research.”PS: Political Science & Politics41 (3): 483–94.Google Scholar