Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6f6fcd54b-7967c Total loading time: 0.259 Render date: 2021-05-12T05:37:07.912Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: {}

Long Lines, Voting Machine Availability, and Turnout: The Case of Franklin County, Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2006

Benjamin Highton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis

Extract

Within polling places, does the scarcity of voting machines cause longer lines and thereby dissuade some people from voting? Are voting machines scarce in some areas because turnout would be low, irrespective of the availability of voting machines? In Ohio in the aftermath of the 2004 presidential election, the answers to these questions carried very real and significant political stakes. Consider the following from Franklin County, the second most populous county in the state. In precincts where voting machines were plentiful (i.e., where there were fewer registrants per available voting machine), turnout was especially high and John Kerry's share of the presidential vote was low. In contrast, in areas of machine scarcity (i.e., precincts with many registrants per available voting machine), turnout was lower and Kerry's vote share was higher. These relationships are shown in Figures 1A and 1B. Given the strong association between machine availability and the Kerry vote, if machine (un)availability was a cause of (low) turnout, then Kerry may very well have received fewer votes than he would have had more machines been available or had the distribution of available machines been less skewed toward precincts that were more supportive of George W. Bush.I appreciate input from SSRC Commission members Henry Brady, Martha Kropf, Walter R. Mebane, Jr., and Michael Traugott with whom I collaborated on the SSRC's “Interim Report on Alleged Irregularities in the United States Presidential Election of 2 November 2004” (Brady et al. 2004). I also thank Benjamin Bishin for comments on the paper. The Social Science Research Council and its staff, including Jason McNichol, Dashiell Flynn, and Sarah Alexander, provided generous support for this work. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily shared by other SSRC Commission members or the Social Science Research Council.

Type
FEATURES
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Brady, Henry E., Guy-Uriel Charles, Benjamin Highton, Martha Kropf, Walter R. Mebane Jr., and Michael Traugott. 2004. “Interim Report on Alleged Irregularities in the United States Presidential Election of 2 November 2004.” Social Science Research Council. http://elections.ssrc.org/commission/research/InterimReport122204.pdf, accessed on 3/15/05.
Congressional Record. 2005. January 6.
Dao, James, Ford Fessenden, and Tom Zeller Jr. 2004. “Voting Problems in Ohio Spur Call for Overhaul,” New York Times, December 24.
House Judiciary Democratic Staff. 2005. “Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio.” January 5. www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdf, accessed on 3/15/05.
Jackson, Robert A. 1996. “A Reassessment of Voter Mobilization.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (June): 331349.Google Scholar
Knapp, Joe. 2004. “Effect of Voting-Machine Allocations on the 2004 Election—Franklin County, Ohio.” http://copperas.com/machinery/, accessed on 12/15/2004.
Powell, Michael, and Peter Slevin. 2004. “Several Factors Contributed to ‘Lost’ Voters in Ohio,” Washington Post, December 15.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Long Lines, Voting Machine Availability, and Turnout: The Case of Franklin County, Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Long Lines, Voting Machine Availability, and Turnout: The Case of Franklin County, Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Long Lines, Voting Machine Availability, and Turnout: The Case of Franklin County, Ohio in the 2004 Presidential Election
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *