Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T10:40:09.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organizational Identity and Positionality in Randomized Control Trials: Considerations and Advice for Collaborative Research Teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2022

Nicholas Haas
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Dennmark
Katherine Haenschen
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, USA
Tanu Kumar
Affiliation:
William & Mary, USA
Costas Panagopoulos
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, USA
Kyle Peyton
Affiliation:
Australian Catholic University, Australia
Nico Ravanilla
Affiliation:
University of California–San Diego, USA
Michael Sierra-Arévalo
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Field Experiments: Thinking Through Identity and Positionality
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bedolla, Lisa Garcia, and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2012. Mobilizing Inclusion: Transforming the Electorate through Get-Out-the-Vote Campaigns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennion, Elizabeth A., and Nickerson, David W.. 2016. “I Will Register and Vote, If You Teach Me How: A Field Experiment Testing Voter Registration in College Classrooms.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): 867–71.Google Scholar
Bryan, Gharad, Choi, James J., and Karlan, Dean. 2021. “Randomizing Religion: The Impact of Protestant Evangelism on Economic Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 136 (1): 293380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2019. “Facilitating Field Experiments at the Subnational Level.” Journal of Politics 81 (1): 371–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilliers, Jacobus, Dube, Oeindrila, and Siddiqi, Bilal. 2015. “The White-Man Effect: How Foreigner Presence Affects Behavior in Experiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 118:397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, David, and Brydon-Miller, Mary (eds.). 2014. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coville, Aidan, Galiani, Sebastian, Gertler, Paul, and Yoshida, Susumu. 2020. “Enforcing Payment for Water and Sanitation Services in Nairobi’s Slums.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified July 2021. PDF file.Google Scholar
Davis, Justine, and Michelitch, Kristin. 2022. “Field Experiments: Thinking Through Identity and Positionality.” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096522000671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jon, Furness, Penny, Verrier, Diarmuid, Lennon, Henry, Bennett, Cinnamon, and Spencer, Stephen. 2018. “Desert Island Data: An Investigation into Researcher Positionality.” Qualitative Research 18 (3): 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duflo, Esther. 2017. “Ely Lecture: The Economist as Plumber.” American Economic Review 107 (5): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, Mary Q., and Bartell, Tonya Gau. 2011. “Pathways to Equity in Mathematics Education: How Life Experiences Impact Researcher Positionality.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 78:4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Lee A. 2017. Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gueron, Judith M. 2002. “The Politics of Random Assignment: Implementing Studies and Affecting Policy.” In Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Education Research, ed. Mosteller, Frederick and Boruch, Robert, 1549. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Nicholas, and Khadka, Prabin B.. 2020. “Increasing Women’s Access to Justice in Weak States: Experimental Evidence from Somalia.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified November 20, 2020. PDF file.Google Scholar
Haenschen, Katherine, and Jennings, Jay. 2019. “Mobilizing Millennial Voters with Targeted Internet Advertisements: A Field Experiment.” Political Communication 36 (3): 357–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haim, Dotan, Ravanilla, Nico, and Sexton, Renard. 2021. “Sustained Government Engagement Improves Subsequent Pandemic Risk Reporting in Conflict Zones.” American Political Science Review 115 (2): 717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Brian F., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2022. “LGBTQ Scholarship: Researcher Identity, RCTs, & Ingroup Positionality.” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096522000038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Alexandra, Cheema, Ali, Karim, Sabrina, Lake, Milli, Liaqat, Asad, and Mohmand, Shandana Khan. 2022. “Field Experiments on Gender: Where the Personal and Political Collide.” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096522000415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Andrew G. D. 2020. “Researcher Positionality: A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research—A New Researcher Guide.” International Journal of Education 8 (4): 110.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J., Meredith, Marc, Chainani, Anjali, Olin, Nathaniel, and Tse, Tiffany. 2021. “Results from a 2020 Field Experiment Encouraging Voting by Mail.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (4): e2021022118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021022118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, Macartan. 2015. “Reflections on the Ethics of Social Experimentation.” Journal of Globalization and Development 6 (1): 87112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. “Field Experiments and the Political Economy of Development.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, MacLean, Lauren M., and Read, Benjamin L.. 2015. Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eunji, Badrinathan, Sumitra, Choi, Dhongyun Danny, Karim, Sabrina, and Zhou, Yang-Yang. 2022. “Navigating ‘Insider’ and ‘Outsider’ Status as Researchers Conducting Field Experiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Tanu, Post, Alison E., and Ray, Isha. 2018. “Flows, Leaks, and Blockages in Informational Interventions: A Field Experimental Study of Bangalore’s Water Sector.” World Development 106:149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Adam S. 2021. “How to Form Organizational Partnerships to Run Experiments.” In Advances in Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P., 199216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, John A. 2011. “Why Economists Should Conduct Field Experiments and 14 Tips for Pulling One Off.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, Michelson, Melissa R., and Valenzuela, Ali A.. 2012. “Emails from Official Sources Can Increase Turnout.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7 (3): 321–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, David, and Furlong, Paul. 2017. “A Skin Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, ed. Lowndes, Vivien, Marsh, David, and Stoker, Gerry, 1741. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
McCorkel, Jill A., and Myers, Kristen. 2003. “What Difference Does Difference Make? Position and Privilege in the Field.” Qualitative Sociology 26 (2): 199231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, David W. 2007. “Quality Is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2013. “Positive Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation.” Political Psychology 34:265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas, and Bailey, Kendall. 2020. ‘“Friends-and-Neighbors’ Mobilization: A Field Experimental Replication and Extension.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 7 (1): 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, Kyle. 2013. “Ethics and Politics in Field Experiments.” Experimental Political Scientist 3:2036.Google Scholar
Peyton, Kyle, Sierra-Arévalo, Michael, and Rand, David G.. 2019. “A Field Experiment on Community Policing and Police Legitimacy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (40): 19894–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, Wendy E. 2014. “Positionality.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research, ed. Coghlan, David and Brydon-Miller, Mary, 628. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Justin, and Siddiqi, Bilal. 2013. “Delivering Justice to the Poor: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Liberia.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified November 15, 2013. PDF file.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, Maggi, and Major, Claire H.. 2013. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sikes, Pat. 2004. “Methodology, Procedures, and Ethical Concerns.” In Doing Educational Research: A Guide for First-Time Researchers, ed. Opie, Clive, 1533. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soedirgo, Jessica, and Glas, Aarie. 2020. “Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (3): 527–31.Google Scholar
Usmani, Faraz, Jeuland, Marc, and Pattanayak, Subhrendu K.. 2018. “NGOs and the Effectiveness of Interventions.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified May 2018. PDF file.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokum, David, Ravishankar, Anita, and Coppock, Alexander. 2019. “A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Effects of Police Body-Worn Cameras.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (21): 10329–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed