Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-rq46b Total loading time: 0.197 Render date: 2022-12-04T05:10:55.311Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English
PS: Political Science & Politics PS: Political Science & Politics

Article contents

The Rural Side of the Urban-Rural Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

James G. Gimpel  and
Kimberly A. Karnes
James G. Gimpel
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Kimberly A. Karnes
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

The time does seem to be ripe for revisiting the urban-rural divide, with an eye toward understanding what lies beneath it. The last two presidential elections have revealed an urban-rural cleavage that is hard to ignore. Most observers now recognize that the “red” vs. “blue” Election Night maps really mask an urban-rural divide within states—a gap that has increased in recent years according to a range of definitions. In 2004, the difference in Democratic support between the most and least populous counties in the nation exceeded 25 points (see Figure 1). Survey marginals are comparable, although rural populations are not well represented in most national polls. Tabulations from the 2004 American National Election Studies (ANES) indicate a 20-point gap in presidential preference between inhabitants of counties with more than a million people and those in non-metro counties of less than 25,000.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 467 - 472
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, Larry. 2006. “What's the Matter with What's the Matter with Kansas?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1: 201–226.Google Scholar
Buttel, Frederick H., and William L. Flinn. 1975. “Sources and Consequences of Agrarian Values in American Society.” Rural Sociology 40: 134–151.Google Scholar
Drury, Renee, and Luther Tweeten. 1997. “Have Farmers Lost their Uniqueness?” Review of Agricultural Economics 19: 58–90.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1975. The Housing Question. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 416–440.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and John Zaller. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 268–307.Google Scholar
Flinn, William L., and Frederick H. Buttel. 1980. “Sociological Aspects of Farm Size: Ideological and Social Consequences of Scale in Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 946–953.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Gimpel, James G., and Jason E. Schuknecht. 2003. Patchwork Nation: Sectionalism and Political Change in American Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Greenberg, Edward S. 1981. “Industrial Self-Management and Political Attitudes.” American Political Science Review 75: 29–42.Google Scholar
Knoke, David, and Constance Henry. 1977. “Political Structure of Rural America.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 429: 51–62.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1977. “Agrarian Political Behavior in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 543–565.Google Scholar
Martinson, Oscar B., and E. A. Wilkening. 1984. “Rural-Urban Differences in Job Satisfaction: Further Evidence.” Academy of Management Journal 27: 199–206.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, and John Zaller. 1984. The American Ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rodgers, Willard. 1980. “Residential Satisfaction in Relationship to Size of Place.” Social Psychology Quarterly 43: 436–441.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Sidney Verba. 1979. Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class and Political Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Rural Side of the Urban-Rural Gap
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Rural Side of the Urban-Rural Gap
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Rural Side of the Urban-Rural Gap
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *