Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-489z4 Total loading time: 0.33 Render date: 2022-05-29T09:33:44.158Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Stump Speeches and Road Trips: The Impact of State Campaign Appearances in Presidential Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Jeffrey S. Hill
Affiliation:
Northeastern Illinois University
Elaine Rodriquez
Affiliation:
New Mexico Highlands University
Amanda E. Wooden
Affiliation:
Bucknell University

Abstract

Travel, stump speeches, and pressing-the-flesh make up a large part of any presidential electoral campaign. Obviously, candidates feel that their appearances are important, as they make hundreds of appearances between Labor Day and Election Day. But are they right? Well over 100 million people cast ballots in November, but only the tiniest fraction of voters meets or catches a glimpse of either of the candidates. Do candidate appearances and contact sway voters in some way? In this article, we use changes in weekly state tracking polls to determine the impact of candidate appearances in battleground and non-battleground states. Using polling data from the 2000, 2004, and 2008 elections, we find that campaign appearances can change a candidate's polling percentages, and that the impact varies by candidate and location (battleground state, safe Democratic state, or safe Republican state). We also find that the selection of a vice-presidential candidate is important, because of this candidate's ability to campaign effectively.

Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, Larry. 1993. “Messages Delivered: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series—Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Homestyle. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven F. 1993. “Reexamining the ‘Minimal Effects’ Model in Recent Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 55 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. “Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 543–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 409–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbfinger, David M. 2004. “Supporters Get Incentive Plans at Bush Rallies.” New York Times, September 28, 1.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Erik A., and Jackson, John E.. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herr, J. Paul. 2002. “The Impact of Campaign Appearances in the 1996 Election.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 904–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Jackman, Simon. 2003. “Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1994. “Campaigns, National Conditions, and U.S. Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 973–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2002. “Did the Whistle-Stop Campaign Matter?PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (1): 5966.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 2006. “Do Campaigns Really Matter?” In The Electoral Challenge: Theory Meets Practice, ed. Craig, Stephen C., 121. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and McClurg, Scott D.. 2005. “The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 689703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Politics at Harvard University. 2002. Campaign for President: The Managers Look at 2000. Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.Google Scholar
Johannes, John R., and McAdams, John C.. 1981a. “The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 512–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, John R., and McAdams, John C.. 1981b. “Does Casework Matter? A Reply to Professor Fiorina.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 581604.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Hagen, Michael G., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, David C., and Morehouse, David. 2004. “Moving Voters in the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Local Visits, Local Media.” KSG Working Paper No. RWP04-003. Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government, January 14, 2004.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Larry D., Sjoquist, David L., and Stephan, Paula E.. 1986. Understanding Regression Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Series no. 07-057. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 3345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stata. 2007. Stata help for xtpcse. http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?xtpcse (accessed January 11, 2007).Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Witcover, Jules. 1977. Marathon: The Pursuit of the Presidency. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Erikson, Robert S.. 2002. “The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 969–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Stump Speeches and Road Trips: The Impact of State Campaign Appearances in Presidential Elections
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Stump Speeches and Road Trips: The Impact of State Campaign Appearances in Presidential Elections
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Stump Speeches and Road Trips: The Impact of State Campaign Appearances in Presidential Elections
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *