Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Klotz, Robert
2004.
The Nuclear Option for Stopping Filibusters.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
843.
Larocca, Roger
2004.
Strategic Diversion in Political Communication.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 2,
p.
469.
Chiou, Fang-Yi
and
Rothenberg, Lawrence S.
2006.
Preferences, Parties, and Legislative Productivity.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 6,
p.
705.
Ostrom, Elinor
2006.
Converting Threats into Opportunities.
PS: Political Science & Politics,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Koger, Gregory
and
Fowler, James H.
2007.
Parties and Agenda-Setting in the Senate, 1973-1998.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Bawn, Kathleen
and
Koger, Gregory
2008.
Effort, Intensity and Position Taking.
Journal of Theoretical Politics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
67.
Wawro, Gregory J.
and
Schickler, Eric
2010.
Legislative Obstructionism.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
297.
Artemov, Georgy
2013.
Time and Nash Implementation.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Artemov, Georgy
2015.
Time and Nash implementation.
Games and Economic Behavior,
Vol. 91,
Issue. ,
p.
229.
Dion, Douglas
Boehmke, Frederick J.
MacMillan, William
and
Shipan, Charles R.
2016.
The Filibuster as a War of Attrition.
The Journal of Law and Economics,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 3,
p.
569.
Gray, Thomas R.
and
Jenkins, Jeffery A.
2017.
Unpacking pivotal politics: exploring the differential effects of the filibuster and veto pivots.
Public Choice,
Vol. 172,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
359.
Wawro, Gregory J.
and
Schickler, Eric
2018.
Reid's Rules: Filibusters, the Nuclear Option, and Path Dependence in the US Senate.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 4,
p.
619.