Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-b9rrs Total loading time: 0.29 Render date: 2022-12-05T12:27:43.902Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2017

David R. Mayhew
Affiliation:
Yale University

Abstract

For this occasion, I decided to tackle a topic of, I hope, some historical and theoretical interest, of current policy importance and one that might have interested James Madison.I would like to thank Alan Gerber and Eric Schickler for their help on this work. A useful clarifying point came from Morris Fiorina. Matthew Glassman helped with the references. That topic is supermajority rule in the U.S. Senate—that is, the need to win more than a simple majority of senators to pass laws. Great checker and balancer though Madison was, this feature of American institutional life would probably have surprised him and might have distressed him.

Type
SPECIAL TO PS
Copyright
2003 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams Henry1986 History of the United States During the First Administration of James Madison, 1809–1813New YorkLibrary of America
Alsop JosephTurner Catledge1938 The 168 DaysGarden City NYDoubleday, Doran
Altman O. R.1937 First Session of the Seventy-Fifth Congress, January 5, 1937, to August 21, 1937 American Political Science Review 3110 (December)71 93Google Scholar
Altman O. R.1938 Second and Third Sessions of the Seventy-fifth Congress, 1937–38 American Political Science Review 32 (December)1099 1123Google Scholar
Baker Leonard1967 Back to Back: The Duel between FDR and the Supreme CourtNew YorkMacmillan
Binder Sarah A.Steven S. Smith1997 Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States SenateWashington, DCBrookings Institution Press
Buchanan James M.Gordon Tullock1962 The Calculus of ConsentAnn ArborUniversity of Michigan Press
Burdette Franklin L.1965 Filibustering in the SenateNew YorkRussell & Russell
Caldeira Gregory A.1987 Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-Packing Plan American Political Science Review 81 (December)1139-53Google Scholar
Caro Robert A.2002 Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon JohnsonNew YorkAlfred A. Knopf
Davis Kenneth S.1993 FDR: Into the Storm, 1937–1940New YorkRandom House
Dewar Helen2002 Anti-Cloning Bills Stall in the Senate; Vote Unlikely Soon, Washington Post, June 14, A4
Dewar HelenJuliet Eilperin2002 Senate Votes Down Permanent Repeal of Inheritance Taxes, Washington Post, June 13 A5
Fisk CatherineErwin Chemerinsky1997 The Filibuster Stanford Law Review 49 (January)181 254Google Scholar
Gilmour John R.1994 It's Time to Curb the Filibuster Public Affairs Report (September)14 15Google Scholar
Greenbaum Fred1967 The Anti-Lynching Bill of 1935: The Irony of ‘Equal Justice—Under Law’ Journal of Human Relations 15 (3)72 85Google Scholar
Hall Richard L.1996 Participation in CongressNew HavenYale University Press
Ickes Harold L.1954 The Secretary Diary of Harold L. Ickes, vol II, The Inside Struggle, 1936–1939New YorkSimon and Schuster
Jacobs Lawrence R.Robert Y. Shapiro2000 Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic ResponsivenessChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
Jennings Ivor1969 Parliament. 2nd editionCambridgeCambridge University Press
Johnson HaynesDavid S. Broder1996 The System: The American Way of Politics at the Breaking PointBostonLittle, Brown
Krehbiel Keith1998 Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. LawmakingChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
Leuchtenburg William E.1995 The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of RooseveltNew YorkOxford University Press
Mayhew David R.1998 Clinton, the 103d Congress, and Unified Party Control: What Are the Lessons? In Politicians and Party PoliticsJohn G. GeerBaltimoreJohns Hopkins University Press
Mayhew David R.2000 America's Congress:Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison Through Newt GingrichNew HavenYale University Press
Moore John Robert1968 Senator Josiah William Bailey of North Carolina: A Political BiographyDurham, NCDuke University Press
Oppenheimer Bruce I.1985 Changing Time Constraints on Congress: Historical Perspectives on the Use of ClotureCongress ReconsideredLawrence C. DoddBruce I. Oppenheimer3rd edition Washington, DCCongressional Quarterly
Patterson James T.1967 Congressional Conservatism and the New DealLexingtonUniversity of Kentucky Press
Polenberg Richard1966 Reorganizing Roosevelt's Government: The Controversy Over Executive Reorganization, 1936–1939CambridgeHarvard University Press
Riddick Floyd M.1974 Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices. 93rd Cong., 1st sess., S. Doc. 93–21Washington, DCU.S. Government Printing Office
Riker William H1986 The Art of Political ManipulationNew HavenYale University Press
Sala Brian R.2002 Time for a Change: Pivotal Politics and the 1935 Wagner ActPresented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago
Schickler Eric2001 Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. CongressPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press2001
Schickler EricGregory Wawro2002 Where's The Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-cloture SenatePresented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Boston
Sifkoff Harvard1978 A New Deal for Blacks:The Emergence of Civil Rights as a National Issue, vol. 1, The Depression DecadeNew YorkOxford University Press
Stearns Maxwell L.1994 The Misguided Renaissance of Social Choice Yale Law Journal 103 (March)1219-93Google Scholar
Welch Richard E. Jr.1965 The Federal Elections Bill of 1890: Postscripts and Prelude Journal of American History 52 (December)511-26Google Scholar
Wheeler Burton K.1962 Yankee from the WestGarden City, NYDoubleday
Wolfinger Raymond E.1971 Filibusters: Majority Rule, Presidential Leadership, and Senate NormsReadings on CongressRaymond E. WolfingerEnglewood Cliffs, NJPrentice-Hall
Young GarryValerie Heitshusen2002 Testing Competing Theories of Policy Production, 1874–1946Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago
12
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *