Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-476zt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T13:14:38.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supreme Court Justices Really Do Follow the Election Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

Forrest Maltzman
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Lee Sigelman
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Paul J. Wahlbeck
Affiliation:
George Washington University

Extract

More than a century has passed since the fictional Mr. Dooley declared in his rich Irish brogue that “The Soopreme Court follows the illiction returns,” but until now no hard evidence has existed of just how fixated the Court is on presidential elections [but see Flemming and Wood 1997; Mishler and Sheehan 1993]. Fortunately, now we have proof positive, which we serendipitously unearthed from its resting place in the Library of Congress, where it was entombed deep in the personal papers of Justice Harry Blackmun.

Type
Features
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett William J. 1993. The Book of Virtues: A Treasury of Great Moral Stories. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 2004. http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/03pdf/03--475.pdf.Google Scholar
Chickasaw Nation v. United States. 2001. 534 U.S. 84.Google Scholar
Dybis Karen. 2004. “NCAA Office Pools: All-American Illegal Fun—March Madness Kicks Off Workplace Betting, But Some Say It Saps Worker Productivity.” Detroit News, March 14.Google Scholar
Eisler Kim. 1996. “Hot Hands; Looking for High-Stakes Poker? The Action Is in Prince George's—and It's All for Charity.” Washingtonian, January.Google Scholar
Epstein Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth, and Thomas G. Walker. 1996. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments. 2nd edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Fair Ray C. 2002. Predicting Presidential Elections and Other Things. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher Marc. 1995. “The Private World of Justice Thomas; At the Supreme Court, He's the Most Visible but Least Known.” Washington Post, September 11.Google Scholar
Flemming Roy B., and B. Dan Wood. 1997. “The Public and Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (April): 468498.Google Scholar
Geracimos Ann. 1998. “D.C. Power Players Ponder Big Deals; Private Poker Game Offers Relaxation.” The Washington Times, November 10.Google Scholar
Grove Lloyd. 2001. “The Reliable Source.” Washington Post, April 18.Google Scholar
Kennedy Helen. 2003. “Gambling on a Vice: Virtues Pusher Won't Play by the Book— His.” Daily News, May 3.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Tom W. Rice. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Maltzman Forrest, James Fred Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mishler William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87 (March): 87101.Google Scholar
Mulligan Moira. 1987. “Personalities.” Washington Post, January 24, C3.Google Scholar
Nusbaum Marci Alboher. 2003. “Executive Life: Executives Ante Up, and Win Some Skills.” New York Times, February 9.Google Scholar
Polsby Nelson W. 1982. What If…? Explorations in Social Science Fiction. Lexington, MA: The Lewis Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Shipp E. R. 1986. “Scalia's Midwest Colleagues Cite His Love of Debate, Poker, and Piano.” New York Times, July 26.Google Scholar
Spaeth Harold J. 1999. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953–1997 Terms. 9th Version. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
State Foods Wagered In Playoff Bets.” 2004. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 7.Google Scholar
Taylor Stuart, Jr. 1988. “Rehnquist's Court: Tuning Out the White House.” New York Times Magazine, September 11.Google Scholar
Thomas Evan, and Michael Isikoff. 2000. “The Truth Behind the Pillars.” Newsweek, December 25, 46.Google Scholar
Woodward Bob, and Scott Armstrong. 1979. The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar