Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016


Matthew C. MacWilliams
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

While the party decides theory explains the outcomes of past nomination battles for president, this year in the Republican presidential contest party insiders failed to anoint a standard bearer. Who decides when the party elites don’t? In 2016, it was America’s authoritarian voters. And their candidate of choice, Donald Trump, is anathema to party leaders. I argue that Trump’s rise is in part the result of authoritarian voters’ response to his unvarnished, us-versus-them rhetoric. The failure of Republican Party insiders to coalesce behind one candidate opened the door for Trump. Authoritarian-driven partisan polarization (Hetherington and Weiler 2009), increasing fear of real and imagined threats, and terrorist incidents abroad and at home provided the fuel for Trump’s campaign. And Trump’s message and manner ignited that fuel, propelling him to the Republican nomination for president.


Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Adorno, Theodor, Frenkel-Brunswick, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, Nevitt R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 2006. The Authoritarians. Online: theauthoritarians.com.
Altemeyer, Robert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 1988. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1990. Issues Evolution: Race and the Transformation of America Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A..1986. “The Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution.” American Political Science Review 80: 901920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, John. 1989. “Authoritarianism and Group Identification: A New View of an Old Construct.” Political Psychology 10 (1): 6384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24 (1): 4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley and Stenner, Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18: 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, David H. 1989. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich. 1941. Escape From Freedom. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 546–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc and Weiler, Jonathan. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition,” Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, Howard, Lodge, Milton, and Freitas, Kate. 2005. “Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information.” Political Psychology 26: 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism.” American Sociological Review 24 (4): 482501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 4649
Total number of PDF views: 6516 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th October 2016 - 2nd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-cxk4b Total loading time: 1.446 Render date: 2020-12-02T21:00:00.899Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Wed Dec 02 2020 20:05:51 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *